broadband infrastructures under transportation and digital infrastructure, sun corridor network and other university efforts are here under University higher ed. And then there's a K through 12 educational section, you'll see them all in a few minutes. But on the federal side, it is more of a standalone broadband section that we have. So Intel uses the words tic toc for major and minor revisions of how their CPUs are made different generations. And I'd have to say that this guide is in most years, and I believe this year, incremental. There are years that are major about six years ago, we lost the primary authorship of the federal policy section from Comp TIA and national group. And I had to develop a much more deep and sophisticated federal policy to replace the bid we were getting from them mostly about spectrum allocation and evolution did much more extensive work. And then the state section two to three years ago with the pandemic was radically transformed, then. So just most years are incremental. And some years are more dramatic. So we'll see what you think. The draft has been out for a couple of weeks, we've shared it. Sandeep and I met last week on Friday, and I got some feedback from him over the weekend that is integrated to this document. And what we're gonna do is, it's 12 pages, it would take three hours to just walk through it. So we're only going to focus really on what changed unless we get to a section and you want to stop and talk a little more about it. So the introduction to the primary broadband section does make sense some transportation infrastructure, just by the nature of the documents. So it's it's not broadband related, but I have to kind of keep it together for the master editors. Here. I've now directly referenced ARPA and cares funding, which was a little odd last year. So I'm just going to talk through sections. There's really some apple pie and motherhood about emerging technologies and leadership, very high level broadband regulatory reform and support. Now I have posted this markup as a document. You're welcome. Yet this week, I'll be accepting people's input and seeing what I can do with it, probably through this week in the weekend. And I'll need to deliver my draft probably the beginning of next week. So you've had a few weeks you have about another week to offer any markups or changes. Again, introduction to the state government process, had to acknowledge the new maps last year they were pending. And the fact that those maps under the Data Fabric will select the targeted communities, subject to challenge that we'll be dealing with the end of this year and early next year. This is where a DOT has been active the last few years, not much is changing. I was hoping they would by now have actually had their RFP out and selected there was selected their public private partner and be maturing in that that's still a pending equation. So the language hasn't changed much there, though, as most of you will know 140 million has been spent completing Flagstaff to no Galus segments that were missing. And still to complete but underway. Flagstaff to the California border. So the next domino to fall with monies will be likely Flagstaff to New Mexico completing that T and then the KPMG broadbands. My middle mile Strategic Plan identifies any number of other middle mile elements and strategizes and prioritizes them. So we're still waiting a little for the shoe to fall on that. Then here is some treatment would be now that the beat is known. So I'm going to read this new stuff, adjust internal strategies and resource allocations. As a state the plans are submitted, iterated and approved to up to optimize their practicality and impact. The sate allocated 23 point 6 million last year for a new rural broadband accelerated match fund. To provide matching funds for upcoming the grants. Arizona has $993 million beat allocation EA team will require at least 25% 248 million in matching and the state should add to the rural accelerated match fund in following sessions throughout the beat program is that recommendation. Then this appears twice once under the broadband infrastructure, and again under the education and erase section. But this past year, the state allocated 5 million for E Rate matching funds that will unlock additional infrastructure and development, benefiting anchor institutions and the surrounding communities and should continue to fund such matching and following legislative sessions. Last year, Steve kind of led and maybe the year before the last two years, this digital equity section. I'm open to it evolving further, but no one has given me further input. But that was one of the things so pandemic brought to the fore was digital equity, you know became the new catch word and phrase and all sorts of efforts came up and are still coming up around it. So that was the part of the big change two to three years ago. In adding digital equity elements, navigators and community partners their hay community role broadband action teams and cooperation commission. revisions of the Arizona Universal Service Fund it's evolution from high cost telephony is still a desire. We haven't there has been an open docket but no action so Arizona has actually done enormously well with the data center industry with certain tax breaks and other policies. Digital Government means eat your own dog food. That, you know, we should practice good government through these digital technologies. And then, in the Education Workforce section, the primary change is the repetition of the recommendation that on an ongoing basis, the 5 million that we got this year that funding be considered in that manner. Now, here, I pushed this to Derek and Laura and Aaron Carr, Jordan, and I will again, this has been fairly stable the recommendations around the tewara University suncourt are around digital equity. And I'm kind of waiting to hear from them again, any of you in today's short time. I'm glad to take some conversation. But obviously, we're going faster than, you know, a deep dive would allow, which is probably merciful to all involved, I would say. And then I believe the final section, Arizona has been a leader in telehealth through the use of a Dr. Weinstein, Janet and my Keeling for many years has been the lead in this section. And I'm out asking for what is new or what should be new. But some important things are the MultiState consortiums for physicians and nurses that if you can practice in one state, being able to do telehealth, with your license in Arizona from other states, for example, apparently this year, tele tele veterinary services were approved. And I'm yet trying to think whether I need to say something about tele vet veterinarian in here. So