So just to cover a little bit about the purpose of our session today. So this is to engage in dialogue and solicit feedback from everybody on our current concepts for the proposed scoring rubric. So please keep in mind that this is a draft, this is not anywhere near completed, it's not anywhere near finalized. So what we're trying to do is gain an understanding of what issues are important to consider in our world development. These starting points, so the rubric that you're going to be we're going to be discussing today is really to start conversation around the topics and the points of consideration. So again, these are not intended to be a finalized version of any rules. But we have to start somewhere. And so we're going to try to provide understanding about our thinking and intent. But the predominant thing that we want to do today is get feedback. And we want to hear from a variety of people. So I know that there's a lot of folks who do come to our board meetings and provide comment, but we want to hear from a broad base area. So we will be limiting to some comments. If I hear folks going off topic, we'll be addressing that as well. So the overall conversation today, again, risk refers and relates to the existing rules, or actually the not only the existing rules, but potential modifications as are necessary implement the social equity bill, which was engro, second substitute Senate Bill 5080. And so a couple of reminders before we really get underway. So all rule language is in a preliminary conceptual draft stage. So again, these are not final concepts have been developed based on feedback that we've received thus far. So I think if folks remember the presentations that our licensing division gave during a board meeting around the feedback that we received from applicants, we also did a survey that we received applicant or applicant feedback on. Those are some of the points of feedback. We've also had public comments in the board meetings that we've taken into consideration. But recent feedback that has been presented, like at the last board meeting hasn't necessarily been incorporated into the presentation today. So don't feel like that hasn't been heard or it's being discounted, that is under consideration. Again, nothing's been finalized. And there's no decisions that will be made today. So all feedback is going to be considered. And not all feedback can be adopted. So remember, we're getting a vast variety of perspectives. So not everybody will agree and that's okay. So we're not going to be able to build in 100% of the suggestions that we received, but we are looking at trying to be responsive to those points of interest. And so, after this is all done today, please keep in mind that the additional comments and feedbacks after the meeting can always be provided in written form through our email or rules@lcb.wa dot gob. So a couple of ground rules for today. So I need people to stay on topic with constructive feedback. So today's focus is really on the scoring rubric and comments on Should addressed, what you like, what you don't like? What are your concerns, what are the suggestions and any kind of perceived impacts if the language were to stay the same or move into another area. So, if you are not going to be talking about these particular points you may be cut off. And we may end up muting you for that, because we really want to keep on task today and be able to get as much feedback as we can from as much variety of folks as we can. So please be respectful of one another's time on no personal attacks. Again, if you are commenting and ends up being a personal attack, we know I'm going to cut you off. And you will not be called upon again, during the course of the feedback session. So we are going to have one speaker at a time you'll be called upon, we ask people to raise their hands. So we can move through if you have spoken already on something and we see people who haven't spoken, we may not necessarily go in order of how the hands are raised. Because we want to hear from as many people as we can. And this conversation shouldn't be just focused on one person or one group of people. So again, we're going to try to spread that around if we can, as we move through this. So as far as the time of speaking, we'd like folks to keep it to a minute or two, we got a lot of ground to cover today, a lot of people are online. And you know, once you've made your comment, you know, we can, you may want to make provide more. And that's perfectly fine as we're looking at this. But we do want to keep things moving along and not having comments or feedback, it's unrelated to these particular areas, we are going to do a subsequent rule, feedback session on the other rules outside of the scoring rubric. And so that's going to be next week. So we'll have more opportunity, there will also be public comment periods that are available. And we're also planning on doing some surveys. So there's going to be plenty of time to be able to provide some feedback. But we definitely want folks to be able to have an opportunity. So if you're going to provide comment about something somebody else has said, you can simply just say, Hey, I agree with that comment, you can leave it there, if you need to say why that's fine, and be concise. If you can't, if you disagree with somebody's comments, that's fine to be able to say, hey, I don't agree with that perspective. And here's why I think that that's not necessarily the right impact. But if people are going to attack one another's positions, or opinions, then you may be cut off, and we'll move on to the next person. Again, we'll have a five minute break scheduled, that we'll see how we're doing, we may bypass to make sure that everybody's got enough opportunity to to, to talk.