Well for me, is I think for for each of us, it's something different, for sure. But for me, part of what I discovered is that there are through lines throughout her thinking, you know, there's something consistent that and sort of baring the imprint of her voice, and her worldview, but there's also something quite impressive about how varied it is in terms of what those views can be. So there's something almost formally, like consistent in terms of her if we think about how one thinks as a kind of form, but the content itself is always changing and, and also the mode in which she's writing about it is changing. I think for me, it's also one of the things that I really value about, about the variety of forms on which she's working, is to think about how the forms we adopt as writers can and should change depending upon the ways in which we're conceptualizing the the work itself, you know, in terms of the immediacy of the work, know how certain forms, beg to be used, because they're a little bit more urgent, or the ways in which we can deploy forms to You know, like us a book review, and order something that is often thought of as not being weighty, or is having a lot of significance for the understanding of an artist work or writers work, or an activist work, you know, it's a book review, like seems to be inconsequential, like something you do as a professional, like in academia, we call it like, professional service, it's not so much a publication. But like, you know, I really am impressed by like, she writes her book reviews, like I write my book reviews, like it's an occasion to, to make a point and to think through an issue. You know, so I'm really, the ways in which she adapts forms, the ways in which she overwrites forms, meaning like, sort of infusing them with her own sensibility and purpose. So that that's part of what why don't I learn from her a lot as a writer, like the possibilities of what I can do as a writer.