Yeah, that was in the database, the official database that the military keeps that lists many of the projects they have cooperated on over the years. And there's a few sentences next to each entry and the one next to Top Gun says that the film completed rehabilitation of the military's image after it had been savaged by the Vietnam War. So yeah, that was that was one of the main functions of the film, scholars have been pointing out for years, that Top Gun represented this kind of watershed moment, where aesthetically, at least as appeared on the screen, the United States emerged from the Vietnam War emerged from the quagmire of Vietnam, the jungle in the muck, and instead, kind of set up shop in the sky, and clean, sleek, F 14. So it completely changed the dominant image of the military and allowed for a kind of selective forgetting of the past of Vietnam in particular, I mean, for a couple of decades after Vietnam, Americans didn't want to do it. Again, they were extremely reticent to authorize military force. So it required a an aesthetic intervention to remake the image of the military and pave the way for the first Gulf War, which happened just a few years later for getting Vietnam was one of the functions but another function was just completely D politicizing conflict, right, you'd have to justify the war, don't have to even name the enemy. I mean, it's an implicit message of American exceptionalism, we can just do what we want to do in the world of no questions asked. That's, of course, the implicit message of Top Gun Maverick to that the United States has every right to bomb anywhere else in the world that it wants doesn't even have to justify it, or again, name the country, that it just has the exceptional right to conduct operations like that. You could try a thought experiment and reverse the roles. What if the Iranian government had a hand in making a very popular movie about bombing uranium facilities in some unnamed superpower, we'd be freaking out about it. We'd say they're condoning war crimes, which they wouldn't be. But when we make the movie, nobody bats an eye. So so that's one function of the film, which is that normalization of that story of American exceptionalism. Then on top of that, you have the function of the film as a kind of weapons advertisement for forging emotional connections between the American public and in this case, the F 14. And these kinds of emotional connections accumulate so that next time there's a defense appropriations bill in front of Congress, it sails right through. And then of course, the most obvious function of a film like this is recruiting, the Air Force really made out, much to the chagrin of the Navy, the Navy actually commissioned a study to figure out exactly how well Top Gun worked for them, and whether people thought it was about the Air Force instead. And they found really predictably, that yeah, people thought it was the Air Force about 40% of the audience, that this was an Air Force movie, the Navy went to work on initiating projects that were top gun like, but were obviously about the Navy. And so they initiated a television show in 1988, called super carrier because I knew that aircraft carriers and nobody would mistake that for the Air Force. And they could still have planes. So very top gun like television show went online during the late 80s. That was designed to glorify the Navy and kind of fix this problem that they have with associating Top Gun with the Air Force.