So having worked hard, I would say that it is not unusual for the largest housing authority in a region for a bottle in a local area to have more scrutiny. Because we're the size indicates risk. So the bigger the agency, the more risk Okay, so that's that's part of why but I would say clearly given our troubles around delinquent research rent collection occupancy, there is more heat and light or it me or us has been very proactive in trying to help us make suggestions about ways in which we can get our collective act together, if you will. They are aware we meet with them every two weeks, so they're on the public housing side and I don't know if you do monthly or bi weekly as my monthly we do. So, so they're, they're in and sort of knows what we're doing and the direction of how we're getting there and what that means, but I do think that this is their opportunity to either assure themselves that we're going in the right direction or not. And I and so I like this opportunity to tell them how we're trending to show them that we're trending. And that we've got all the pieces in place in terms of policies and procedures, and that were really focused as, as Mr. Watson said, on execution and implementation, filling vacancies, collecting rent, doing research, doing inspections, the guts of the operation, because that's you can have all the policies in the world. If we're not executing against them the right way, then policies really don't mean much of anything. And so I think it's the scrutiny it's the it's our come to Jesus moment, in some ways for this organization, and potential