So what's in the literature. And what we've been finding when we've been talking to people isn't necessarily the same thing. So I guess the ethics of quarantine are that you're severely restricting somebody's movement, and that's for the good of the public rather than the good of the individual. Right. So there's a decent amount that we that 'sin the literature about reciprocity. So ideally, you need to be helping people to quarantine. So I know that in Canada during SARS, there were quite a few people quarantined at home, I believe they were given assistance with various things, particularly around food, shelter, different shelter, if they needed it, that just that sort of thing to make sure people could essentially discharge their responsibilities to the public in as easy a way as possible. So that's been kind of the basis of talking about quarantine. So, you know, like, with all of that Least Restrictive means stuff, don't do it unless you have to. With I... yeah, I don't really want to (laughs). Whether or not, that's a good approach. But, you know, ideally, it would be something of a last resort, and that you would help people do it, you would make it as easy as possible for them to, I guess, do the right thing to protect other people.