I mean, honestly, that's, that's a very difficult question. You know, because I have seen people try to, you know, I'll give an example, like with the Blight team, you know, sometimes the community gets in an uproar over, you know, something, and, you know, and it gets media attention, and then everyone, you know, obviously wants to act, and it's like, okay, but we have laws, we have rules, we can't just, you know, you know, throw a bandaid on this or, you know, skirt, the Constitution, or, you know, the laws that exist, and, you know, just to try to, you know, to please people, yeah, and, you know, and to do the optics, but you know, I understand that that is part of the job, you know, you just have to figure out, okay, how can I get accomplished the goals that need to be done stay within the parameters of the law, but also, you know, appease appease the masses, I think it's a difficult, it's a tightrope that sometimes, you know, unfortunately, you know, one of my co workers had an experience where they was in a situation, there was a situation where the, you know, community wanted something, what they were asking, honestly, is just was outside the confines of the law, you know, we she was trying to work out a situation where everyone could be happy, and we think that kind of all come to the table. But, you know, instead it was pushed to a court, and we just didn't have the law on our side. And then it's like, okay, well, now, nobody's happy, because we could have at least got some kind of a consent agreement. But because, you know, you forced it, you didn't want to work with them, you just wanted them, you know, shut down, even though there's like, literally no basis in the law for them to be closed. You know, but it trying to appease them, we move forward, and then we'd lose in court. And so it's just like, well, you know, that's kind of what happens. So I think when you, you know, I guess I would try to let people know, hey, this is what could happen, this is the bad result that you don't want. So kind of, you know, let's kind of take a step back, and let's be reasonable, and let's look at what the law provides. And then let's see if we can make it so that everyone gets what they are looking for out of this in terms of a result. And as opposed to you know, just having, you know, pushing things to a head moving, you know, full force ahead. And then, you know, one side ends up happy, happy and the other ends up very mad when there probably could have been a consensus, if, you know, cooler has had prevailed and people had manage their expectations. And what was the second part?