Obviously, the selection of partners is really one of the most important things that we can do at ICI j if we let in one unreliable or untrustworthy journalist into the ICJ family, then it only takes one reporter to ruin the whole thing, you know, Panama Papers could have been leaked or revealed months in advance or, you know, the data could have been shared with a government agency. So it's something that people like I who work full time at ICI J take very seriously and have many restless lights on. It's also something that we work on long term throughout the year. You know, reporters like Omar have, excuse me, worked with our CIA for a long time. So we know as soon as we get data, that we're going to go back to Umar and say, Are you interested? Obviously no reporter in the world is obliged to work with us. You know, next time Umar receives a call from Schiller and iCj who might would hang up and you know, we might never hear from him again. I hope not, but there's no obligation in this world. What we try and do is kind of identify reporters who share similar values. And those values are of course, being the investigative reporter but being a collaborative investigative reporter, and those things don't always go together. There are many wonderful investigative journalists out there, who I respect highly, but who will openly tell you collaboration just isn't for me. And to be honest, I have enough to do with my own reporting and my own coordination that I don't have time to go chasing after reporters who don't want to do the Pandora papers, right. Second of all, I see ij spends a lot of time trying to expand our membership and our partnerships 600 reporters. Sounds like a lot but let's not forget the Pandora papers still didn't have reporters from many countries in the world. I think of places in Africa or Asia or the Middle East, usually now where press freedoms, significant press freedom curtailments are significant places like Vietnam and places like Singapore even that maybe we don't think of as often, you know, Democratic Republic of Congo, you know, countries that have real media restrictions. I and my colleagues spend a long time identifying reporters throughout the year and communicating with them because to be honest, I want to know that if you work on kind of Pandora papers, you're going to respond to my whatsapp message or to my email. And so I it's almost a bit like dating. In that you make the initial contact, and then you have a period of courtship in which you kind of introduce yourself you determine whether or not your styles and your work philosophies match, and if they do, then welcome to the family. Because the great thing but also the terrifying thing about ici Jays model is, once you're in you're in, as I say, Alyssa didn't just have access to the Filipino Pandora papers, documents, Elisa had access to everything. So if Alyssa and her team wanted to write about Vladimir Putin's friends, or, you know, the President of Ecuador, for example, they could they could definitely do that. And that's a great part of the system, but that also obviously involves a higher risk and a higher level of conflict between journalists around the world. And look, I can assure you, let's not pretend that the Pandora papers and the ICI Jays model works smoothly all the time. There are lots of minor tensions and many World War threes that are always threatening to erupt. But again, because of our CO J's experience with this and because of the kind of personalities of journalists that we have, we usually managed to keep those below the surface.