yeah, I think that, you know, that's that's definitely reasonable. It was, you know, for us covered in our pathology section. But a lot is. Covered into pathology as well, and, and, yeah, like, I think you're just doing the right thing, and I do the exact same thing. I agree with you that it would be a great refresher just on skin. I would agree that on skin conditions just in general, wouldn't be a bad a bad thing to be reminded of again, like I'm 19 years out, and, you know, the research changes. Everything changes. It is up to me to stay current. I understand that, but there's, there's a lot in 19, in 19 years, that I've forgotten about, I will admit, and I need that, that refresher, for sure, our continuing education system here used to be very similar to what you're describing. I think we had 30 hours every three years, and the majority of them had to be from like a hands on course, like you could do research, you could have discussion with your peers, you could read, but you majority, like the majority of your hours, had to come from hands on, which I do understand. What has changed for us now is that we get to choose. We just kind of have to do a self assessment about where, where we're at, and what we need, what we feel we need to learn. So you kind of, you kind of have some weaknesses that are going to come up when you self assess, and the goal is to then pursue courses that meet, you know, that kind of match those weaknesses, so that you can be a better practitioner. I don't see anything wrong with that. So there's a lot more flexibility, because it's so broad, though it does, it does confuse a lot of our massage therapists. I like it. Some people don't, but I found that with that other approach, where you had to have these 30 hours, these hands on hours by a certain date, well, most massage therapists, like they forgot until like, the last four months of the year that they needed these 30 hours, and then they're just scrambling to take any course that they can get, you know, and a lot doesn't necessarily come to Ottawa, so you're kind of like, well, maybe I could go to Toronto or, like, I've traveled to the States before for courses. But that, to me, doesn't feel like it's very like specific either, that now you're just scrambling to take courses for the sake of taking courses. Whereas you said you're looking for specific courses based on where your clients are at, what the demographic of your clients are, where your interests are. And I found that, yeah, I feel like it's just better this way. So not everybody's scrambling to take those courses just to meet the requirements. As I said, No, education is wasted. But I also feel like, did you really want to take that course on the foot? You know, probably not. I mean, it's great, but at the same time, like you're you're just like meeting your hours. And then I also feel like, course educators, course educators, like they deserve, like they deserve to be paid for their hard work. But I felt like they also could capitalize like on that, that demand, right? They're like, Well, I'm just gonna throw my course out there, because people have to meet like they have to meet these requirements. So I feel like that weeded out a lot of people doing courses just for the sake of selling courses. I mean, massage therapists, we you know, maybe, like hands on is not our only method to earn income. I get that, but, yeah, but amazing. Yeah, that's just my rant on on how continuing education works. Here