So the feedback is interesting, and I'm going to share with you some of the feedback that I get to do with our secure document handover workflow, right? I'll just give you a quick rundown on how it works, so that anyone who hasn't seen the software is aware of or why we're saying what we're saying. We I'm I want to make sure that, and I understand that there's a big importance for an architect to work transparently with their clientele, right, so that they can get to the best design outcomes in the smoothest and the most efficient way possible. Now, historically, I think this has involved an architect acting in good faith and handing over to their client a version of work that carries some form of monetary value. And they've done that in the good faith that the client will reciprocate and compensate the architect in some form of timely manner when the time comes right now, unfortunately, and I know that you've spoken at length about this before, in the past, there are just too many instances where an architect, or any other type of design consultant, too, for that matter, gets caught out, where the funds that their road take Months and months to come in right in some of the most extreme circumstances, they just don't get paid at all. And then this has the flow on effect whereby, you know, there's the struggles to remunerate its employees, bills aren't paid, and it becomes a cash flow nightmare. So knowing that the customer really wants to see the drawings that an architect's prepared, but knowing that an excess amount of Transparency can put the company at some form of financial risk, where we wanted to build a solution that brings comfort, security and enough transparency to both parties to help Simplify the handover equation. So what we've done, we have developed a call it, a two tier solution, which I'll run you through. It. Now, suppose you're an architect, and you produced a piece of work for me. It's an elevation plan, and you're ready to share that to me. What you would do is you would upload that document to our platform, and then the contents of that document, they would be rendered in our secure viewer, which, as I said before, prohibits things like downloading and saving. If you want to add an additional layer of security, you can do that by adding a watermark, but it's not like your normal draft style watermark that we've seen since, like, you know, Windows 98 and Microsoft there where you would just get the gray draft that sits across the document. What we do is each page that's uploaded is analyzed, and then we scan the, say, the length of a document and the the side of the document and try and determine how many watermarks can we fit along the long edge, and how many can we fit along the short edge? So if the answer is four and three for say, an A four document, you'd expect to see about 12 watermarks patterned across the page. Now we don't just use a normal watermark either. The watermark that we have has got three components on it, so the first part of the watermark makes reference to any payment that might be owing on that document. So suppose that elevation drawing that you prepared for me had a value of two or 3000 pounds. Well, then that payment stipulation would be printed onto the watermark. Suppose that then you wanted to add some form of a custom commentary, so something that says this is only for review purposes and software construction, you could include that as well on the watermark and on the other half of the watermark down the bottom, we normally put our company logo just as an additional form of protection. We have had some users who've asked us to put. Their own design company logo there, and that's something that we've been able to do for them as well. Now we get mixed responses on some of this functionality, and I think it comes down to a couple of things, as I said before, depending on where someone is in the world that influences their response. I think depending on the type of projects that people take on as well influences their appetite to want to use perhaps some of the more stringent security measures that we've got. The other day, I had a conversation with someone who said to me, they said, Harry, looking at platform was good and all, but why would I need to use so much security to share a document with one of my clientele, if we've been working together for such a very long time, and they've always been good payers, but never had any issue. It just seems like it could be a little bit overkill. And the truth is, Ryan, I agree with that person, you probably don't need to have that much security in place when you're working with someone who you trust and you've got a very good working relationship with however, there are still scenarios where I believe this functionality can be very, very beneficial. If it's okay, I might just share a quick story about this, because I think the story will beyond just showing why the platform has a purpose. It's also a good learning experience for any say, younger architect or any design consultant who might be looking to get involved in projects that are larger than just one architect and one client, whereby the relationship may be a little bit more transactional. So a little while back now, I was made aware of a set of circumstances involving an architect who was leading a project for a client who was a property developer. Now this developer, he was a very wealthy guy, and he operated mostly as an individual. And what His strategy was, he would purchase or acquire a piece of land, he would then try and get the land height limit uplifted. And then once he was successful with getting the land height limit uplifted, he'd then get an architect and their team to design a new building for that block of land, and then he would sell the project with a development application approved to someone like a construction company. Now this fellow, as I said, wealthy guy, very clever, but he had a reputation of being a very slow payer, and he was somewhat a selective payer, and in some instances, if he got with that one of his projects was about to be or had been rejected at the planning level, there was a very good chance that any consultant that hadn't been paid as yet probably wasn't going to get paid. Now, in this scenario, the council required an artist's impression of what the proposed development was going to look like, and so the lead architect engaged a 3d designer to produce these required renders. The time came for the architect and the client to review this first version of the renders, and so the designer, in good faith, sent over the images with the very basic draft watermark positioned across the image. A LITTLE WHILE past, and the 3d designer hadn't heard back from the team the architect, and so he got on the phone and said, What's happening with the work that I've done? Do we need any changes, or do I just export the final version? Now, when he spoke to the architect, he was met with this very vague and somewhat dismissive response. And this aroused some suspicion in the mind of the 3d designer, because he knew that when he took on the project, there was a quick turnaround required, and that, you know, it had to be done yesterday. So here in New South Wales, we have a system in place whereby whenever an application or a large development application is submitted for review, it goes on public exhibition, right? So anyone from the public can log on and have a look and see what is going on in the planning world around here in Sydney. And because this 3d designer was a little bit suspicious as to what was going on. He knew that the project should have been submitted by now, so he got onto this portal and looked up the project that he had contributed work to. And so he starts digging through. He finds the project, and halfway through the file, he finds his work that he had submitted, right? But the draft watermark had been removed, right? We now he found out later, that interesting, yeah, so he found out later, due to some time constraints, that the architect in the office they had a. Gotten their act together with giving the feedback back to the designer and the architect, actually asked one of the juniors in the office, who was very savvy with Photoshop, to lift that draft watermark and touch up any blemishes on the render. Right now, when I heard this story, I was just very disappointed to hear that this stuff happens like they're a group of professionals, and, I mean, they're basically acting like thieves. It's not the right thing to do.