Right? That's a good question. I remember when I first delved into justice O'Connor's life, and I spent a lot of time out in her legislative files in Arizona, and a lot of time down in the Powell, lewis powell archive down at Washington and Lee because she and justice Powell were such good friends. And she had written up all sorts of wonderful correspondence that helped me see into her life. And obviously I spent time in Arizona and went out to the ranch. So I was very much focused on how Sandra Day O'Connor became Sandra Day O'Connor. And at that point, I wasn't, you know, I obviously was writing about what she was like as a justice and I had access to lots of paper. To understand that, but I wasn't as concerned then about sort of what the current dynamic on the court was, and that change. And that has changed. I'm working. Now as I, as I'm working on these books. And as I worked on the Chiefs book, I was also trying to add something for readers about the behind the scenes dynamic that would inform the current court. And I think that i think i first got a taste of that when I was doing the book on Justice Sotomayor, the the book I wrote about Justice Sotomayor, which follows the Antonin Scalia book was not a biography, like the O'Connor and Scalia books, where it was much more of a political history. But because while I was doing that, I got some inside information about some, you know, some events at the court and switched votes. For example, what happened behind the scenes when they the justices first took up the University of Texas at Austin case that had been brought up by Abigail Fisher, the affirmative action case, that kind of gave me a taste for finding out more of what was happening behind the scenes. So I, I found that I was pivoting a little bit to try to get more up to date information of what was happening, even though I was looking back at people's lives. And that's why when I did the cheap, the book on the chief, it was a real pleasure to go to Johnstown, Pennsylvania, where his parents had met, grown up and, you know, go to the library there to study the ethnic history of his family. But it was also quite challenging to find out, for example, what had really happened in the first Affordable Care Act case where he, you know, we had known that he had changed his vote on the individual insurance mandate, because of the reporting Jan Crawford had done. But I found that along the way, that he also switched his vote on the Medicaid portion. And I became interested in that and wanting to pull that out of various sources at the court. And that has become a nice challenge to have. And that sort of subtext of of my reporting is not, you know, it's not the main thing that I want people to take from these books, because I want them to be, you know, character studies. But it's been a nice little bonus. And it's helped bring more attention to the reporting, because people, people hardly know anything about what's going on behind the scenes. The court carefully guards a lot of this. And it's been, I felt fortunate that I've been able to find out some things.