so when you look at that particular provision provision, I want to point to is at 3.0. What that says is you know, it terrorist activity means an actor admission in, in or outside Canada that's committed a for a political, religious or ideological purpose be in whole or in part with the intention of intimidating the public describes that further to that intentionally. This is what I want to focus on. A causes death or serious bodily harm to a person by the use of violence, be in danger as a person's life. See, causes a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or any segment of the public. D causes substantial property damage whether to public or private property, if causing such damage is likely to result in the conduct or harm referred to an ADC. And the provision that I want to focus on is the provision under E. So what that says is that terrorist activity that's committed for these purposes that intentionally and we've got to see causes serious interference with or serious disruption of an essential service facility or system whether public or private, other than as a result of advocacy, protest, dissent, or stoppage of work that is not intended to result in the conduct or harm referred to in any of the clauses AC and the reason why I'm drawing your honors attention to this particular provision, is that here, there prohibit prohibiting a certain activity, but they are carving out a zone of allowable expression in the form of advocacy, protest dissent, so long that it is not intended to cause the harms that are listed in A to Z HSC. That's not the kind of prohibition that we have here. Here. We've got a prohibition that groups in everyone together whether you have the intention to cause the harm specified in ASC or not. There's no zone of allowable political expression that's allowed for in the way that these prohibitions have been constructed.