Okay. Perfect. Thanks. Ready to resume yes, we're ready. Ready as well. Thank you recording in progress thank you for your patience, counsel. These are my rulings. The evidence of sales of pharma science. And Apotex. So pick zolpidem off after the proxy period is not relevant and not admitted. The evidence of sales of molecules other than zolpidem were pharma science entered the market prior to APA text may be relevant to what would have happened in the butt word but for world as between them and will be admitted. Subject to weight with respect to the witness in India I know that the ordered the case management judge provided that witness lists and will say statements were to be issued or were to be provided on September the 29th. And the supplemental witness list and we'll say statements that were to be provided no later than October the 15th. And in the will say statement provided by the plaintiff. It lists as a witness an employee from Glenmark will testify if necessary to the following. And then there are two bullet points, ability and willingness to provide zolpidem API for pharma science in the UK for world and prices opened an API for pharma science in the but for world and on that basis. I'll allow the witness to be called by the plaintiffs.