Yeah, I was thinking, sometimes, people really within their research fields don't look outside. For example, in computer-mediated communication, there's a whole set of literature on that topic; or in mobiles for development. There’re sets of theories that people use, but they don't communicate with other fields. I think putting those bodies of literature in conversation with each other is important, and also trying to decenter from a Global North theoretical perspective. For example, there are lots of interesting sociological theories from Brazil: anthropologist Roberto DaMatta talked about this concept “jeitinho”, a way of circumventing of being creative, to go against rules, and establish rules as being an inherent characteristic of Brazilian people, because we, since colonial times were prone and used to deal with adversities. That led to some other idea, “gambiarra”, which is “working around things” with difficult resources. For example, people in slums normally “steal” their utility services, like electricity and gas, from the “asphalt world”, or the main city, because they are not provided this basic service. So if you go into slums, there are lots of lampposts with lots of wires with clandestine connections so that people can get these services for free. They have right to the service. They're just not provided, so they find a creative way to work around it. Also, de-center this dichotomy. For example, we have this comparative study about Pokémon GO play between Rio and Nairobi, which are completely different cities from an outsider perspective, with different colonial histories and different cultures, but we found a lot of similarities in how people would play games, and walk around urban spaces, and use technologies. Understanding that sometimes differences are not that much culture, but socioeconomic. Understanding some of these creative uses embedded into issues of power, colonialism, et cetera.