Yeah So would that imply that if ignorance were eliminated and physical is it sleep would that happen. Yes, that's exactly what it implies, and as unbelievable as this is Laura, when I first heard it with, you know, my kind of medical scientific background. I said, Are you kidding me. No way. And so I made it a personal point, you know, to ask a ton of really respected really high level Lamas are in PJ's. And after like the fifth one they all said the same thing. You know, you don't sleep, literally, body may go into repose but the mind doesn't turn off 24 seven, no longer need to sleep and in fact at a very deep level this is even more outrageous Laura, you don't even need a body at that point, because body is is a repository store of the unconscious mind your body is your unconscious mind, when we sleep that's what we drop into we go unconscious we drop into the body. So, when you leave when you truly eliminate all ignorance. Not only do you no longer need sleep. You no longer need a body, literally, and therefore when you die, those people what do they do they go up in light, and this is no kidding rainbow light rainbow body. Listen to my interview with Father Francis tiso on rainbow body and resurrection, you no longer need a body. So if you don't need a body you surely don't need to sleep. Right. So yeah, does that refer to the analogy to sleep as unawareness only, no it's it's it's both. It's both. And again, really the important thing here for us. In addition to somewhat esoteric stuff is that the the the moment to moment expression of this primordial ignorance is distraction. I mean, tons of Longo writes about this quite beautifully in his book The Tibetan Yogi's of dream and sleep where he says, you know, you know, this is, this is why these, these practices by the way are challenging because this is where ego goes to recharge its samsaric batteries ego feeds on distraction, it's an archetype of distraction. Ego feeds on ignorance, ignorance and distraction are two faces of the same coin. So, this is why when you do these deep practices, sooner or later ego tends to put you know Do Not Disturb sign saying hey wait a second man. You can wake me up during the day you can Rouse me during the day but do not Rouse me at night, because this is where I go this is where ego goes for ultimate samsaric refuge Buddhists don't sleep they don't fall asleep they fall awake, Tim. Uh, hi Andrew we are not always aware of the clear light mind, that's for sure. But would it be correct to say that the clear light mind is always aware of us, yes and no. I'll elaborate on that. If so, then could we say that no one's experiences ever lost since they were to remain in existence in the clear light mind. Yeah well as to the last question, that depends on who you ask. This is where the whole Akashic thing comes into play the Hindus have some cool things to say about this was called the Akasha, and the Akashic records that what they say in that tradition that nothing is ever lost everything is kind of coded and encoded in the Akasha in the Akashic Records somewhat connected to, you know, the collective unconscious and somewhat connected to the a consciousness, but not the same. And so, yeah, this is it depends on who you ask, that no one's experiences ever lost depends on who you ask. First part. We are not always aware of the clear light mind but would it be correct to say the clear light mind is always aware of us. Well, yes and no. Not not quite because the clear light, light mind is not separate from us. And so I wouldn't use that phraseology I mean, you know, for one thing. And this is important, Tim is that there's only the clear light mind, I mean that's all there is, like, even right now. No kidding. I mean like right here right now. This is the clear light line, we just don't see it as such. When we dream, that's the clear light mind we don't see it as such in deep dreamless sleep. That's the clear light mind. We don't see it that way. So, the clear light mind is all there is. And so it isn't it isn't quite accurate nor is it quite inaccurate to say that declare light mind is always aware of us that that kind of nomenclature doesn't is come at somewhat nonsensical at this level. The clear light mind, in and of itself is always aware. When you say it's aware of us. That's a tricky thing to say I wouldn't actually say that, but the nature of declare light awareness is in fact awareness. So when you imply that it's aware of us that implies that there's some thing aware of something else no.