Sure, thank you, Marcel. The elimination of this protection will undoubtedly endanger domestic violence victims and children and will disrupt decades of prevention work. And education that has ensued since the enactment of the law. The law has shown to be an effective approach to prevent homicides. But the law alone is not sufficient to protect survivors as it is. So while we know this is, as I mentioned, it's an important tool. It's one of our fundamental tools, right? Despite its existence, enforcement is a major impediment to effectiveness. So while judges may restrain a respondent from possessing firearms and a protection order, currently, the surrender itself is not self implementing. So in other words, a judge can order in a protection order x person is not permitted to have a firearm, the firearm does not automatically disappear, right. There are other systems that have to be put into place, other coordination that has to happen so that the individual surrenders the firearms so that the firearms are then placed somewhere, there needs to be systems in place to petition for firearms to be returned, if that's applicable. If, for instance, a protection order ends and it's safe for a survivor, that person can then have the firearm returned to them, right. So there are lots of systems that need to be put into place and coordinated. In order for these laws to work effectively. States have to have implementing legislation as well, to make it most effective, law enforcement officers must be trained. And really importantly, survivors need to know that these laws exists. So we're sitting here we're talking about this law, we're talking about Rahimi, but many people don't know that this is a tool to help survivors achieve safety. So we need advocates that can tell survivors that this is a law that this is something that they should know about that if they know that the person who has been abusive to them or has threatened to harm them has access to a firearm, that they can report it that they should safety plan they should think about, especially if a person is going to be ordered to turn over a firearm, a survivor should think about what steps they can take to keep themselves safe, especially in the immediate aftermath of a person surrendering their firearm, for instance, or being told they have to surrender their firearm. These are times that are especially dangerous for survivors. And so we want to think about all of those things. But the reason I bring all that up is because while this particular law, of course, is not a panacea, it doesn't mean that the presence of this law has eradicated firearm deaths. And it doesn't mean that it's the law is eliminated, that it's the only recourse. That's not the case. But what this law has done is that it created awareness, and it manifested all of these different systems, doing more education, educating law enforcement, educating judges, like I do, right advocates, educating survivors. So the law itself, not only did it actually remove firearms from the hands of people who shouldn't have them, it also created a prevention strategy, it created education, outreach, all of these things. So that's why policies are so important. It's not just the law itself. That's important. It's everything that surrounds it, all of the outreach all of the education. And this is how we make communities safer. So I think one of the biggest challenges if we find that this law is overturned in the Supreme Court is this piece around awareness, education, outreach, and how it has helped mobilize all of these different systems to get firearms out of the hands of people who are dangerous and should not have access to them.