And then that the next one, he says, There are three kinds of compassion. One kind is compassion whose object is living beings as such. Another is compassion whose object is elements. The third is object plus compassion. And then it goes back to the first one, the compassion whose object is living beings as such, is the compassion of one who thinks beings are real, and their delusions are real, and who wishes to liberate these real beings from their real delusions. This is sentimental compassion, which is limited by feelings. It is still just emotion and desire, not real liberative Compassion. This, this points to the the the uncompromising purity of of Zen, Zen teaching, Buddha's teaching really, is that it's really, it's really talking about compassion. before realizing the illusory nature of beings of things. And, and it hints that the, the attachment to the idea that I'm going to save that person or help that person Roshi Kapleau used to say the difference between a Buddha and a bodhisattva is that a bodhisattva, and still some to some fate. Very, very faint degree is still slightly attached to the idea of self another, I'm helping you. For most religious people in the world, that's enough. But it's not enough seen from the purist point of view and Zen. Just to finish what, what Roshi Kapleau used to say, whereas a Buddha just helps others as naturally as breathing has no notion in the mind. I'm helping you. Poor you, you need my help. A it's not bad, it's pretty good to be able to do these things, good deeds in the world. We need those people. He's just saying that it's not the purest kind of compassion. And then he talks about the compassion of one who thinks beings are real. Excuse me, that's the same one. And he says, the compassion whose objects is elements is the compassion of one who sees all beings as conditional productions of causal relations, as compounds have elements that have no real person or thing in themselves. This is illusory compassion for illusory beings. Using illusory means to liberate illusory beings from illusory delusions. It's pretty close to the first one. Although it transcends the sticky motion of sentimental compassion. This dreamlike compassion still retains the image of illusion. So it is not yet truly liberated compassion Excuse me. And then. And then the third kind. What he said earlier his object was compassion. He doesn't really even mention that. This would be what? What just referred to a minute ago is the compassion of a Buddha. It just freely reaches out without no idea of real or illusory others to help.