absolutely. And I think this is a great moment to sing the praises of the unrecognized and unglamorous work of being Secretary. It's really hard to do minutes and to do a good job with them. And I know Commissioner Lord was absent from the last meeting, and I don't remember who volunteered or was voluntold to take minutes. So thank you to whoever that was. And I don't mean this as any attack, but that's like a cleanup, because this is a public facing document, I would suggest that at the top all the commissioners names should be listed as they normally are, at the top of our agenda and at the top of our minutes, and then under roll call, all the people, all the commissioners in attendance should be listed. And then throughout is kind of customary to use either chair as a chair, green or commissioner and last name. And that's not consistent throughout the document. And again, I understand taking minutes in the moment and all of that, but just there are a few moments where it's either just a last name or just a first name. And I would just ask that the that get amended to, do you know, commissioner or Chair, Vice Chair, whatever, and last name. And then finally, just a little and this is really just to clean up in terms of clarity under item five discussion on the second page. I think what would be most helpful is to do A, B, C, D, E, according to the different items that were under discussion in the agenda. Otherwise it just gets kind of confusing to track and follow. So that would mean that item A is federal actions related to civil rights and impact on commission the draft reports the United Nations would fall under that and then B would be civil rights ordinance, revision C, finalized, etc, etc. And then under that item A, there were a couple of motions that were were brought before the commission. And it's not clear from the notes that that happened, like in certain moments, like under draft report to the United Nations, it should say at some point that there was a motion. And I think this comes on page three, where it says city attorney to help edit the document with Commissioner Bergquist. There's it says Commissioner Scott motioned, or it should be made a motion, but motion that we submit a report pending resolution of six that is proposed by the city attorney, Commissioner Salazar seconds, the motion, it should say there that the motion was adopted, and it doesn't say that. So it's just a matter of clarification that I don't know what the AC civil rights department is standing for. But then there was an additional motion on the resolution, and it's not clear, because it's kind of buried underneath the UN report. It should be, like bumped out a couple so that it's clear that there was an additional motion on a resolution you know, that that was presented. So it just needs a little little bit of clarification for transparency, say, for the public, so that they can tell what happened, so that you know, Commissioner Burke was presented draft resolution. And there was discussion, and there was a vote, which that just needs clarification. And then finally, with respect to the reports piece under standards and procedures, I just, I don't recall this, but like to me, it's not accurate to say there are no concerns still outstanding about the standards and procedures and the changes to the ordinance. So I requested that just be struck or or because it just, I think we did discuss that there were still concerns. Okay, we have a chance to talk about that later today. Sounds good. Sorry for taking so much time,