housing quality here in the city. Madam Chair, thank you member, Benson was next. All right, thank you, and thank you, Mr. Taverna, for bringing that information up. And so what I wanted to say is that it seems like these contracts have brought to bear and to the forefront a very critical issue, and that is actually managing the process in house versus outsourcing. But I believe this can be done on two tracks, because the other issue is a public health and safety issue that has to be addressed. And now what we're looking at 80,000 rental properties in the city of Detroit, 70,000 of which have not been inspected. And the reason we have, one of the reasons that we have a rental inspection ordinance, is the young lady less than a year old, who crawled into a hole, into a home, fell through the first floor into the basement, into a pool of human feces and urine and drowned. That is the issue that we're trying to solve for and these contracts allow us to do that if we want to immediately establish a inspection Academy. It would take time. We would also need to turn down these contracts and further postpone the ability to start inspecting these rental properties, 70,000 of which, out of 80,000 are not in compliance. Which leads to the ability and the danger of more children and more vulnerable residents in the city of Detroit, of falling through holes, of injuring themselves, of not being located in quality, safe housing. So we need to look at both. If we want to turn this down, then we need to vote this down if we want to establish a training academy that can be done on a separate, simultaneous track, but we wouldn't be able to start inspecting homes in a meaningful level anytime soon. But we have to think about the problem that these contracts are attempting to solve, and we can have the conversation about how to bring this type of working house. But for me, this came out of committee. I understand the need to not have small children fall through holes, into raw sewage, into one's rental home, and I understand that we need to move forward on this. I'm hoping that if we bring this back, that we don't continue to bring it back and bring it back in perpetuity, that we actually look to have a vote and then vote these down, if that's the will the body, but vote them up so we can start to have a much better compliance rate with our rental portfolio in the city of Detroit of 12 and a half percent. 12 and a half percent compliance in our rental property is unacceptable. These contracts are here to help us do much better. I wish we could do it faster and had more inspectors and the numbers that we receive, but we could do about 5000 more a year, which gets us to another 12 and a half percent after two years, which then means we have 60,000 units that are not in compliance, versus the 70,000 that we have. Now. It's slow, but it's steady. And while we do this, we could start the conversation about having and bringing these type of services back in house, but at a certain point we have to start talking about the issue at hand that is a public health and safety and the dangerous conditions in which people live because they are living in unqualified on unapproved housing in the city of Detroit. And so I'm hoping that we're looking forward and looking at how we can help our residents who are the most vulnerable, especially our babies who have been injured and died as a direct result