I don't know about it being sketchy. I think they're, you know, it's a nice title to have. It may have been ill advised in retrospect, but he wasn't, I think he wanted authority to do certain things. And, you know, Uber, as you know, from covering the company was super siloed. You know, basically, yeah, I think he wanted to have, you know, to exercise some power over over things that he couldn't without that titles. But it is clear that there that that Craig, you know, did blow the whistle on other things. And a lot has been made, in fact that, you know, he was reporting to Joe. But he also, he also told his success of privacy bosses in the general counsel's office about what was going on with this case. And those and those were the people that were answering the FTC questions. There was some emails, it was in there a couple emails introduced as evidence that asked Joe to look over some stuff and say, you know, is this right, do you have any problem with this? And one of those answers out of a long series of answers was, there haven't been any bad breaches, you know, since that, or something like that. And that's what he got in trouble for not flagging, but it wasn't like the strongest eight, you know, it wasn't the strongest evidence in the world. I think there was more problems with the wording of the NDA, which said that in order to get this $100,000 check, they said or maybe was Bitcoin they said, The statement said, we have not taken or kept any data from Uber as part of our as part of our explorations. And that was false, because they had so the in the jury, you know, the lawyers in the case got into, like, who did the edits on that NDA? And Joe did some edits, but did not that one. So the prosecutors were arguing that even though Craig Clark was the one who had put in those words, Joe should have edited that and maybe he was like, the brains behind that ad. I mean, it is thin. I mean, it's it is really thin. It seems like there was a lot of judgment call in this, you know, by interpretation by the by the Feds and by the jury,