call, great point. Yes. So the primary applicant, it can be a partnership application, the primary applicant need to meet this standard before. It's like a vetting criteria. And I understand that there are a lot of laundry list before even someone apply for the big funding. And it's here for a protection. Historically, there are a lot of defaults. And we are seeing defaults in ARDOF funding all over the country. We're seeing defaults in other fundings. These are here to protect the citizens of every single state and make sure the companies are not defaulting in between the projects and these projects are getting built. So these are directly coming from NTIA and the states are right now definitely online to implement these requirements. So quickly going over with the compliance and applicable law, we have operational capability, ownership important information for the state for sorry for the ISP or the entity, public funding information, fair labor practice and high high and how they're going to utilize the highly skilled workforce and create jobs here in the state, and Environmental and Historical Preservation ie pH and build American Buy America, Baba compliance, this is very important that where they're buying the equipment from the equipment need to be manufactured 55% here in United States, so the entity needs to meet that that obligation to, along with that, the entity has to submit a cybersecurity compliance and supply chain risk management compliance plan for us history of business surfacing and working history in the state of Arizona. And current Sam. gov registration. I know this looks really sometimes silly. But we went through this process during our 100 million dollar investment. And trust me, we're still we're still collecting information from the entities regarding some of those requirements implemented not these details implemented by a US Treasury. So these are the things we need to see beforehand before someone can apply for the bead funding. So continuing to the next section. So the mapping information for project application and letter of interest. So basically, what we are saying that they need to give us a net present value or expected deployment cost, that how much they will be spending for specific project areas someone is applying for multiple projects, they are single project area, so that we can set a benchmark on our end that how much money we have to spend for every single project area. So if I can summarize this whole section, it's basically taking a feedback from the ISPs convert that into a CS benchmark and release the final project area based on their feedback that how much money did the ISPs will spending in a specific project area. Then we separated the whole project application into two different rounds. So in round one, we will receive the application basically hold the state will be upward play. And if we have tiny project areas just to give you an example, and we received multiple application or at least single application for each and every single project area, at least 25 And then we have five leftover that five will get rolled into the prod round two. So hope we will get all the application all the project areas by round one, but if there are project areas, which is not getting any interest, because due to the business case or due to the financial case, it will get rolled into the Round two, in round two, there will be a little bit more flexibility if those project area does not have any interest, we'll probably be interested wrapping it up with a different project area and make sure that all the household here in the states are connected. Now, as part of the federal guidelines, we clearly highlighted here fiber preference and outlier definition. So in the state of Arizona, like any other state, we are definitely prioritizing fiber. So when we receive this application or market sounding data from the ISPs, we will see that which number or which households within a project area is feasible to go with fiber, anything over a certain amount of number, we don't know that number, yet, that number can be somewhere between 5000 to 6000 6000 to 7000. Again, I'm speculating here we have to go through a cost modeling study, before identifying that number, the moment it crosses that number will switch into a different technology. So that costs also not only we are trying to calculate on our end, we are trying to calculate the real life data from the ISP application. So there will be multiple going back and forth, that which area or which household within a project area will get fiber and which household will get wireless or some kind of satellite technology. So we discussed about that extensively in this section. The information which will be provided to the applicants, so the unserved and underserved BSL meanings broadband serviceable location, the high cost BSL, eligible CI and their least will be published in the state Broadband Map so that the ISPs when they're applying, or the entities when they're applying, they can take those information and basically create their financial model from there. Once the application is submitted, we will do the post application assessment. So initial screening scoring, the initial screening, then scoring and deconfliction, we talked about how we are going to select the fiber and non fiber option in this section. So you can have a look. And then finally, any negotiation which will be done on behalf of the state how we will cover a whole project area everything was defined in this section. So after post round one, there will be a negotiation with the entities who will be applying for the bead funding was a negotiation done, there will be a contract, ready to be executed. Anything which falls through this negotiation process or any area which did not get any active interest from the ISPs will get rolled into round two. So that's what round two talks about. In the prioritization and scoring process, the way we we divided the whole scoring process is one priority project one non priority project. Think of it when we are talking about priority project, we are talking about the fibre to home project, non priority projects or wireless and satellite projects, or any DSL project, which is non fiber. For the priority projects. If you look at our scoring criteria, and the set the this category, which is basically the primary criteria, the 75% point, these directly, as Nicole mentioned, directly came from NTIA. So the minimum bid outlay is basically their financial model, any entity what financial model they're submitting, and what kind of match they're asking for for that specific project area. And that gives them 50 point. And then cost reasonable, reasonable less, gives them some point and scalability and resiliency. So this whole three category is responsible for fifty points. And affordability is 18 points and fair labor practices seven points. Now as Nicole mentioned, this is a fast pass through, we can change some of those scoring little bit left and right. But the 75 point and these three categories is going to be intact, because not the scoring wise but the categories are going to be intact because it's directly coming from NTIA or federal government. We as a state we define this 25% category. So basically speed to deployment technical requirements, local and tribal coordination and community anchor Institute. You will see if you read any other states plan community anchor Institute is is really unique towards Arizona. The reason we added community anchor Institute in this plan in the scoring criteria, because we don't have enough funding to cover all the community and institutes which is unserved or less than one gig symetrical connection they have. So what do we want we basically said that within a project area, you have to an ISP or entities need to cover all the households unserved or underserved. Along with that the maximum amount of community anchor intitutes they will be connected with one gig of symmetrical connection, they will get these two points extra out of 100. So we're encouraging them to cover as much community intitutes as they can, which is underserved unserved.