I mean that in my experience that the clouds do provide you APIs and or at least are the very least, an interface to estimate that the cost of what you would produce, or what your what Your infrastructure would would cost, and you can include networking, storage and infrastructure and whatnot. But the challenge is that they don't remind you that of the ancillary costs. So for example, if you, if you do a naive costing and say, Okay, I need instances and storage. How much will it cost me? And you forget the network? Well, you don't know that. In addition, if you don't have the metrics are ready or what, what your system consumes, even if it's on prem, you're still going to get an imperfect page care, and even if you do have the on prem metrics. Well, the the the actual consumption on Cloud might be different because of either different different NTU size impacting your network costs, or, let's say you're scaling to petabytes on prem and on Cloud, you're going to need to split it either into separate volumes, because they can only get to hundreds of terabytes, or you need to consider a third party solution, like, I know, like just trying to think here, like any of the sand vendors that have a cloud Offering pure net to the others? Exactly. Yeah, so, so you cannot do a one to one comparison on I mean, I, the conspiracy theorist in me, would say that that they the obscurity is on purpose, just because. It. It makes it easier to for them to focus on just a few metrics and say, like, Oh, see, these numbers are lower, and then you get nickel and dime on everything else.
Download Otter for your meeting notes