Yeah, sure, I was going to talk just a little bit about kind of the oversight board and a few areas where I think it can contribute and sort of and what the limitations are when I joined. And I've always viewed it as very much an experiment. I'd say after two plus years, the results are not all in but we can see begin to see some patterns. And I, you know, a highlight for positives, each of which has a big caveat. You know, the first is really what you were touching on, which is offering this kind of reason, jurisprudence for our cases, you know, questions like, can you call for death to the Supreme Leader of Iran? On the platform, you know, is that should that be protected? You know, should you be able to put unsubstantiated accusations of attacks on civilians in Ethiopia, when those might provoke reprisals? You know, what about questions of nudity based on gender or transgender identity? Like really, you know, honestly, thorny questions, and we go about it in this, you know, very rational way, and we apply human rights law, and it's thoughtful, and there's an opinion. And, you know, my feeling is like, whether you agree with the opinion or not, it matters less than that somebody went through the exercise of coming up with a rationale which never existed before, and that was completely inaccessible before, and it offers a degree of predictability. Now, you know, what's the limitation? Well, you know, we've dealt with, you know, some dozens of cases, you know, out of the enormous ocean Now, not all of those cases, and appeals really raised those novel issues. And it's actually been a process for us to try to hone in on those that do in the beginning, we would take some cases, but actually, when you got right down to it, because we don't have lower courts. So nobody's distilling the issues. And sometimes we would get to the bottom and find actually, there's no real debate here. And Facebook also makes a lot of enforcement errors. So oftentimes, we'll go to them with a case and say, provide us with your rationale for what you did they say, oops, you know, it was just an error, an automated error, a human error. And that sort of voids it out. So that's piece piece, one in terms of our value, and kind of the the limitation of that. Second, is really our ability to probe and shed light into what the company does. You know, and I'll give this example of, you know, we're now working on a policy advisory opinion on COVID misinformation, it's and you know, what, you can sort of get to the bottom of how they've actually handled that and how it's changed over time. And when the opinion comes out, everybody will be able to learn some of what we did, you know, with the piezo, on crosscheck. You know, there were pieces of information we didn't get. But there was also an enormous amount that we did learn that honestly, was surprising about how the system worked kind of a two tiered system, and that those who are beneficiaries of the system, have their content remain up on the platform, even when it's found to be violating while it goes through a whole sequence of Appeals, and during its peak period of virality. So, you know, it is a large loophole that I think a few of us, myself included, didn't understand well. So, you know, there's, there's great value, and we have the ability to ask questions, to make recommendations to get them to respond to those. So I do think it's something that, you know, we need to take advantage, we take that responsibility seriously. You know, at the same time, they remain a private company, and ultimately, they dispose of our requests. Some of them they see to some of them, they don't, and you know, where they don't, we don't necessarily have much recourse. That'll get me to the fourth thing. You know, the third is our ability to drive policy changes. And I think there have been some important ones, they have to respond to all of our recommendations, we always state in our brex, what it would take for us to consider the recommendation fulfilled. So they've accepted a bunch of our recommendations on cross check, including the kinds of users who are going to be eligible for protection under the system. They've just reevaluated and reissued their strikes policy to make that more transparent and kind of less punitive. They've adopted a new crisis protocol. They've done a lot more on translation. So there are a lot of concrete things that they've actually done in our response in response to those recommendations, but ultimately, again, And, you know, it's up to them. And they're important things we suggest that they don't do. I'll just say the last one, which is our ability as a board, spur regulators and other players, I think this is, you know, sort of the next frontier for things that we can't accomplish. Can we be kind of a springboard for those who have power powers beyond what we do to see what needs to be done, and to use their authority to achieve it?