I guess the most pride is difficulty, only because there's so much, but I think what my initial instinct to react to that question has been would be to say, I'm most proud that I think we've largely kept these issues, apolitical. and it's, I think any observer could say these are very challenging times for a nation's politics and the nation's civic culture. And yet, throughout that entire process. I believe that these issues at least from my perspective have remained largely apolitical and have been have been a place where people of goodwill could come together and work to make a difference. And some of those people might have wildly different political views or ideological views, but they share a common intention to try to make things better. And I see that throughout the civic tech programs in particular in the federal government and elsewhere. And I have some measure of pride I suppose, whatever contribution that I may have had, but certainly the team of people that I had the privilege to work with the term hires the fellows the people like Matt Cutts and others who have leaned into this challenge, because I think there's a different. There's a different scenario where December 2016 March, 2017, there was a there was a fracturing in the civic tech community and sort of everyone left and went one way and the other people went another way and instead I think, despite the considerable and honest differences we may have had in other areas, this was something that has kept kept the country going and that's the reason I'm ultimately optimistic about our ability to achieve something long term here, there's nothing more powerful and impactful than American consensus over time. And you want us to have a casual review of our nation's history to see that. I think a second area. In terms of, I guess my to be about pride. It's just a word I struggle with as opposed to someone from the American West but is the, and it's not perfect. I think it's something that there needs to be continued work on but we were always trying to build a culture of team as it relates to, whether it's the career civil servants, political appointees term hires for their technical expertise, the vendor community. And certainly I'm speaking very specifically about civic tech world here. I think we were able to hopefully encourage more of that where we don't look at each other as sort of competing equities, but that we realize that everyone has a valuable role to play in a virtuous cycle of progress whether you're a vendor, a civic term hire career federal employee or an agency leader, and it obviously it's not perfect but I think generally speaking that virtuous cycle is underway and you're starting to see some of that continue into the Vita ministration, as you will know Nick. Anytime you work in the public sector. There's always the unfinished work of the next chapter, there's never sort of a clean break point, even under the best conditions for me I think the next frontier, that I am optimistic that they'll continue to impact is taking the capabilities institutions that two administration's work together to create and delivering large scale enterprise changes to the customer experience, throughout the high impact service providers that have been identified by OMB, you think about the amazing work that, you know, Charles Worthington and and Marina and a whole bunch of other people did for the VA and sort of improving the va.gov experience in a very meaningful way. And taking that as a model to go agency by agency by agency across the federal enterprise, I believe, is it possible I think you're seeing early indications that that's the approach, more or less, that the by the administration will take, but I'm excited to see what they're able to do with it. pivoting back to you. Maybe I'll throw the question your way and sort of say what sort of, I'll give you maybe I'll give you an opportunity, even though it's been some time to talk about pride. Please make you comfortable but