Hey, everybody wants not me. That's what their title is. Yeah, go ahead. I am going to tell you the conclusions. And then then I'm going to start going back and building upon that. But, you know, the first conclusion is that there's a preponderance of evidence that supports that this pandemic started from an unintentional lab leak preponderance of evidence to support that this epidemic pandemic started with an unintentional lab leak. Next, there are significant support, there's significant support that this virus was made in a lab in Wuhan. And then thirdly, there's a significant amount of evidence to disprove their hypothesis that this was a natural zoonotic spillover. I think those are the three big pictures. And we'll come back and build upon those. I want to stop and recognize Senator Richard Byrd and his burden, his leadership, a good friend and mentor, proud of him for proceeding with this. And then we should recognize Dr. Bob Cadillac and Dr. Bob boster. Who were the CO leads for this investigation. They had over 70 consultants, I think there was about 10 or 12 of them that worked on this on a regular basis. I think this is one of the most significant classic scientific papers of my lifetimes. Are you Stephen? Yeah. Well, Senator, you're good. You're good. You're welcome. So you can record there's everything's embargoed until tomorrow at 930. And the report will go live at 930. Wonderful. Okay. So I think it's one of the most significant classic scientific papers of my lifetime. What I love about the way this group did it, is they follow the scientific method. So you know, my background in opposition biochemistry major, minor in nuclear engineering, I'm a scientist and as the scientific method is you put out a hypothesis, and for the most part, you try to disprove that hypothesis. And you also list the supporting evidence. So they put out two hypothesis one a natural zoonotic spillover, and number two a lab leak, and then they exhausted every piece of evidence that they could find every resource witness that they could talk to, to come up with conclusions. I think that regardless of your politics, regardless of whether, at the end of this discussion, discussion, you conclude that it came from a laboratory, or that it came as a natural spillover, I still think there's many, many lessons learned here to be pointed out as well. It took them 18 months to do this 300 pages or 15 170 references. I think that's probably what took them the longest to finally get this report out of just making sure that every reference was ironclad. I'm going to go back to the to their Muddy Waters document conclusions. Number one, the preponderance of circumstantial evidence supports an unintentional vaccine research related lab accident. There was failures in biosafety containment during SARS cov to vaccine related research. Later they say it a little bit differently. The preponderance of information affirms the possibility of a research related incidents that was likely unintentional resulting from failures of biosafety containment during vaccine related research. I'm you're only as sick of me say and unintentional. Every time I say lab Lee coming in to try to say unintentional laughably. Okay, next conclusion. No one can doubt that the labs in Wuhan could make a virus like SARS cov. Two, I think that's beyond anyone's arguments against it, that they had the ability to make a virus like SARS, cov. Two, the world was doing viral ganem functional research with US dollars, US technology, US intellectual property, the CCP controlled the labs, and the PLA personnel interact on a regular basis. I think this is a misconception of the public is, you know, American, here's the military and here's the NIH, and here's these different departments. But the way these labs are set up, it's a cluster of laboratories. in Wuhan, the University of Bhuwan has a vaccine research where they have primates there and they did SARS Kobe one research for the vaccine there as well. Lots of BSL two and three labs that will be important later to recognize as well. And again, these the people that the scientists that work for the PLA interact on a regular basis with scientists at the web, they're coming they're going they're doing research to gather. Specifically, I want to draw your attention, get the report to page 190 referenced 22. I'm going to quote here on August 3 2021 eco health belatedly sub submitted its five year product or support. If you don't know who eco help this, I hope you all would sit down with them and do a real interview. Okay, these they submitted its bladed five year report, which was due September 2019. The peers upon receipt of this five year progress report NIH realize that human mice infection experiments conducted at with were indeed gain of function experiments, as it was traditionally defined prior to the COVID 19 pandemic. On October the 19th 2020, ominous good stop there prior to the COVID 19 pandemic on October 19 2021, one day after sent a letter, one day before sent a letter to Congress notifying about the waves, humanized mice infection experiment, they changed the definition, we need to go back and try to understand why they changed the definition. What gain function research is, but this is no longer just Roger Marshall and Rand Paul saying that we were paying for gain of function research, then AI NIH came to that same conclusion as well. Again, the Snipping evidence supporting SARS cov. Two is a lab created virus. Though feasible, there's many facts to argue against the natural origin spillover hypothesis. Natural emergence typically leaves behind a story a trail of footprint, convincing evidence is yet to be presented and China could do that they could convince us otherwise they can easily present that to us. But when a when a virus goes from a bat, to an animal to to humans, it's not one time one location is gonna be multiple animals. Let's talk about the raccoon dog just for a couple seconds. The furry industry and China's a $30 billion industry. Like we raise cattle, they're raising these little critters, and most of them are sell for their for some for meat in markets. And we'll talk about that. So it just would seem anybody with any logic to think that only one animal from this huge farm that has 1000s of raccoon dogs would show up in only one market there. They're sending raccoon dogs, all different markets. And the first all different places to think that there'd be only one infection from that is just beyond anybody's scientific explanation. And then typically, in an unnatural spillover event, you're going to see progenitors the virus just doesn't go from an animal to a human in one jump, there's going to be multiple tries, and you would find some cousins and some grandfather's of a of a virus that was trying to make that leap. Again, not one raccoon dog, not one animal at the market, the seafood market ever tested positive. Okay, so again, in the in the way epidemiologically supposed to work, if it's an animal, he leave a story and put the print trail and that doesn't happen. All China would have to do is show us the reservoir, they should be able to go back to a reservoir backs and say, Oh, here's the reservoir, they should be able to find the intermediate species by now had three years tested 80,000 animals, no intermediate species is there or show some cousins, some other viruses that are not humanized, that don't look like the human virus. Okay. Conclusion number five, the CCP continues to hide or delay key data that silent and they've silenced many witnesses. If I get a chance. I'll talk about zoo I'll develop that Professor Dr. Xu CHW, who helped develop the vaccine and then been mysteriously dies in May, June 2020, as well. And every time we we I pick on China, we should look in the mirror because our own federal government has kept data from us they wouldn't show they show us the information we've asked for. They won't show us let us talk to the right people. So much of it's redacted. And one of the limiting parts of this research is since this is the Health Committee, they really struggle with getting things from the State Department or the Department of Defense. As do we we've we've even held up certain nominees to get the information from the USA ID to help us substantiate some of our thoughts here.
I'm going to quote here the possibility of a lab leak in the September this is the to leak theory. This will be something that's news. I think this report concludes most likely this was a was to leaks. The possibility of a lab leak in the September October time frame, even as early as July or August was followed by vaccine development in November 2019. That's a key. That's something I could not prove when I made this outline two years ago. So we've concluded that they targeted vaccine development in November 2019 And then another likely lab leak seems to be the most sensible explanation in this retrospective review. Again, there's key data points that are being held back. That could help you help us prove that but but we can't get that data. Number seven, based on the web's experiments on Biosafety and biosecurity concerns, this investigation includes most likely research related incident is an undetected aerosol leak, causing an infection of with personnel or other lab personnel, or else the release of infections virus in the outside environment due to failure of bio containment. These come these kinds of accidents are most common and often not determined after extensive investigation. The nature of this risk was noted by by WIBs biosecurity level for researchers in a November 12 2019 internal report. So this is we have investigators themselves. This is the CCP talking, once you've opened this door test tubes is just as if having opened Pandora's box. These viruses come without a shadow and leave without a trace. That's reference 1513. So the theory is, if you've done any research on how the web was made, it was originally planned to work with with France who had already had a BSL Level four lab done, we we've been building a BSL four in Kansas coincidentally the last five years. So I followed up from the time the concrete was poured, and all the steps what is supposed to look like, well, the Chinese start skipping steps and start doing things on the cheap, just like hydroelectric plants and everything else they do. And France says like we were out, if you guys aren't gonna do this the right way we're out of here. So they did welding seams rather than using other adhesive material. And the theory is that the cleaning agents cause corrosion of these weak these of these seeds. All sorts of documentation, the report of what was being ordered by the web and other laboratories during during this phase are all all of 2019. Just incredible papers coming out concern about biosafety and containment of viruses, especially the aerosols.
Okay, last last conclusion.
Many of the evidentiary gaps in the world's understanding of the emergence of SARS are the result of PRC censorship in the deliberate destruction, withholding of evidence. So there's more than just, it was certainly unintentional. But there was also some mistakes that were not good faith mistakes, if that makes sense. We, China's cover up with this, I think cost millions of lives. If they would have been more forthcoming, certainly, you can't help but think that different countries would have done things differently, especially even the development of the vaccine. They're working on a vaccine development in November 2019. That means they've already got the DNA sequence. Everybody, the leadership in China should know that. And they finally we tested the reverse vaccine in 2001, as well, but they don't let the rest of the world even know what the back what the DNA structure looks like until January the 11th. So just to like this week's cost a program like warp speed, weeks of time, as well. All right. I want to go back through and talk about my timeline for five minutes. And then I'm going to try to open it up for questions. So we made this timeline. I made it two and a half years ago, and then we printed on our website about two years ago. You can find a martial art senate.gov. We did a YouTube honored as well. Everything on this timeline, everything that I've said public has not been disproved. Many of the facts in the points we put up here had been substantiated by this report. Some of them we get to move up, though. And those are the ones I want to talk about and some
additions. Okay. Again, I talked about the two lab leak theory, I think
this is I kind of suspected it, but the but they've certainly been permitted. So certainly that you're the first lab Lafley is probably sometime in August, September, October timeframe, possibly even earlier. And the second timeline is the second LatLng which we probably think is sometime after they started with the vaccine development.
Probably the beginning of December. Okay, I talked about before about the NIH and eco health we're working together in 2018 19. But we can actually back that up even further than that. And more and more importantly, they're doing research in BSL Level Two and three labs. Okay, and I don't have the time to go into the differences, but a BSL two biosafety level two lab wouldn't be like my hospital lab versus a BSL Level four level of the person's in a moon suit right along with special H vac system. So in our surgery rooms, we have special H vac systems, which are much better at decreasing infection. Let's say that in the laboratory, so we can confirm that go all the way back to 2016 1718 that they're doing research at United States research, the hotel and they're doing this and here's a little bit two, three labs and it's amazing what they're doing. What you
