so I didn't. I think there's a way where rather than taking on responsibility to be come mediators. We can understand this like in other contexts, as you have pointed out regarding base appointments or interviews, appointing delegates and alternate state aid that has a vested interest in the function of interviews. But that doesn't mean we have to be the entity itself to fix it. Whether it's encouraging, promoting should channels, whatever with the city, whether it's with a third party mediator, whether it's somebody short conflict resolution, I think coming out with some clear stance, that it's not just like we're going to pretend it doesn't exist not see that's happening now. Right? Or the will kick the can or we expect to be able to do it, but to recognize that a an up or multiple views that aren't working well that aren't healthy. is problematic for all of us, right? But not necessarily jumping to a conclusion that the solution is we need to take that on, but instead we can make sure that happens, which encouraged me to promote we can do other things to say if these things are working then there's some increased diplomatic relations with AIPAC versus if it's problematic, we can't recognize who the chair is. And unfortunately, we can't engage the same way. Right. So I think just be open to other solutions because I think every case is going to be unique versus we need to I mean, if you want to become to be here, but not necessarily. Well, I mean, people do it right. But if you don't, if, if that's not in a parent's wheelhouse, try to take that on. I think it's going to be very difficult.