I think I'm captivated by the notion of belonging, because it's given a much richer, fuller language to talk about what I think we're really aiming for, than than the past words of integration or inclusion and and so I am not an expert in belonging, but I'm curious and trying to figure out what it looks like to move in ways that make this a greater reality. I think before I talk about what surprised us, let me share briefly what we mean when we say belonging, at least in what's emerging from our conversations and work and observations with people with developmental disabilities and their families. And this is important, because belonging is becoming a buzzword, Tim as you hear, and like a lot of buzzwords in our field, there's often not a lot of substance behind what we say. And these are themes throughout your podcast that we call a lot of things inclusion, that aren't really inclusion, a lot of things that are self determination or flourishing, that if you scratch a little deeper, you see it's only the veneer. And I worry about that with belonging. Belonging is really hard to define, but it's interesting, because people could tell stories about belonging. They can talk about the joy they experience when they do belong. They can talk about the deep hurt and wounding when they don't. And so we've listened to those stories and observed people's experiences, and out of that, distilled what we call 10 dimensions of belonging. For those of you who want to read more about this, we can post some articles on this, but when we listen closely, those themes end up being belonging involves being present and being invited, being welcomed and known, being accepted, being supported, being heard, being befriended, being needed and being loved. And what I love about those 10 aspects of belonging is those resonate immediately with us. It's language that connects back with our own experiences, and it takes an important concept and almost operationalizes it for us and puts it in language that we can act on. We can invite people, we can welcome people. We can come to know them and accept and support. We can listen and befriend and come to value and love people. So I love that sense of it, and I think that is the framework that we're working with, not that that is the definition of belonging. That is just sort of elements that emerge, and people are going to have different prioritization of different ones of those, and it's going to look different across concepts. So I wanted to start with that in terms of what we mean. What surprises I mean is how much this resonates with people. When we talk about this in schools, people start to realize this is not really just about people with developmental disabilities or our students. This need for belonging. This actually a universal need and not a special need. These dimensions of belonging are what we want every student in our school. So whereas so many of our conversations become about them or us or this group or that group, it becomes a unifying concept, and now a school can start to say, yeah, how can we foster belonging for all of our students, including and especially those for whom some of those dimensions of belonging? Are so elusive, so that resonating is, I don't think in the 25 years of work I've done anything has sort of more captured people's attention who aren't in the disability spaces than this and become language that connects those worlds. And the second thing that comes to mind, as you asked that that surprised me is actually how little this belonging is debated. Inclusion is debated and discussed all the time. People fold into camps of who's for it or against it. Nobody debates belonging. When people affirm that, then the question is, what are the ways we can design our schools and our workplaces that lead in the direction of this experience of belonging, which leads you back so much to being included in the life of that school or faith community, it takes down the temperature and leads people in the same direction. Belonging isn't about programming, it's about people and relationships. How do we foster relationships when our communities are separated and segregated and when people are living parallel lives? So I've loved that it's been an entry point around some heated debates. I'm still very willing and eager to engage in debates about inclusion. It becomes sort of people can quickly wrap around. And then I think third, this is complex and multifaceted, and I love that it takes us to deeper discussions than just where students spend their days. It pushes us to think about who they spend their days with. So often, the conversations about inclusion are about what class you're enrolled in. I know that's not what inclusion is, but it's the language so often people use. And so we can push people past that first dimension of belonging, of just are they present in that classroom, and start to think about this sort of richer experience, so that just as we pull that back, you start to see all these dimensions of an experience that are mere, much more than about what you learn and where you're sitting. And then, I guess not a surprise, two more are coming to mind. But yeah, I think the not surprise is how elusive this is, and when you share this framework with families, to see the tears that emerge of both this is their deep desire, and yet, how out of reach this can feel for their kids. And that invitation to a birthday party or a sleepover, or that invitation to be part of an extracurricular club or to tend to football game or hang out or sit together at lunch or be part of the same class project, those ordinary experiences are still just so out of reach for so many of our students, which I think takes me to the fifth surprise. And this may sound contradictory to some of the things I've mentioned earlier, but when I think about belonging in this way, it strikes me how actually within our reach, this is to address that when you think about making sure people are invited and present welcomed and known and accepted and supported and heard and befriended and needed and loved, these are things we know how to do. These are things that are in the capacity of people and schools and workplaces and elsewhere. They require more ordinary responses than specialized programs. So you're inviting people to do things they know how to do, but they often don't think to do or remember to do when they're thinking about students with disabilities. Examples would be our peer mediated work of connecting kids in a classroom and holding paraprofessionals and adults sort of to the background, to these facilitative roles, and just getting kids to sit alongside each other, to learn together, to work on the same project, to share their ideas and notes and things, doesn't require dramatic changes. It's more ordinary gestures, the connection that it evokes in people. And then when, when you ask people, What are some ways you can invite better, and ways you can have support better, all kinds of ideas start to flood the people's mind. And so I think those are some of the surprises, and also give me hope that maybe this is some of the language and sort of approach that might take us a little bit further than we are right now.