So monocultural news, Eurocentric news column. So new, Eurocentric lens, colonialism, lens or our colonial Islam, colonial practices that still exist in newsrooms, and one a cultural lens. So we're, so often people don't want to people want to feel oh, we've progressed a lot common. We no longer talk about Eurocentrism because we've moved on where we're five generations away from our British ancestors and we no longer were monocultural. We're not Eurocentric, we're very New Zealand and our perspective. Well actually what we are as monocultural because we're still carrying that Eurocentric. Urus interest isn't through that monocultural lens. And so there is a reluctance to accept the term Eurocentric preferring monocultural. Even though that is a bad term. It's not a bad term. It's just a term, but just remain objective to all these things. And it's just it's just a term. So not all news organizations are Eurocentric, but our mono cultural, monocultural is problematic and she has similar characteristics as zero centrism, which is the dominant group holds power and authority as their their lens and practices dominated people culture and content as well as newsrooms, news organizations, discrimination is present. And it does not include the worldviews of all people in the country, say for example, and Africa. So, while it's not Eurocentric, yep. But in some newsrooms, we know it as monocultural and the people holding power, power and control in the country also hold power and control in in their newsrooms, which is the same as in Russia, which is same as in China. So they continue it's that mono cultural newsroom that is that is challenging. It doesn't allow for other perspectives and actually marginalizes people because you're, you are putting this lens on and it means everybody outside that lens, their context, there is no context for why things are happening. To them. And there is no understanding and basically you've put them on the artists so non risk. The other thing I've learned as is that I've seen as even a New Zealand and Maori media newsrooms. We haven't fully develop their own communications, we haven't fully developed. So what I mean by that is that non western newsrooms will apply Western European and American new standards to validate the news instead of using their own traditional communication practices. So you see some of it but it's not purposeful and so I'd really love for more of our indigenous and marginalized communities to develop their own products and news products and develop their own ways of telling stories and doing news that takes the best of Eurocentric monocultural news and applies it and uses it and puts an indigenous lens over it as well. So it seat so, that's the first step. So step one is simply knowing who you are. Knowing your history, because if you don't know who you are, you won't know where you're going in the future. So to tell who is the acknowledgment and to tell who is really important as well. So first, you must know who you are. You've you've fully realized all you've done with your how you've reported the news, and then you acknowledge your position, you acknowledge what you've done, and it doesn't have to be a full apology. Like some news organizations have done around the world very few I have to say there are 1000s of news outlets around the world, and only a handful and only a very few national news organizations have actually apologized for their representation of a group of people. So stuff to put his stuff group so they are the case study. And I did work there and I loved working there and they gave me lots of opportunities, from journalism opportunities through to leadership opportunities. So called tiaki hotteok. He was created by a group of 15 D. Senior to junior journalist who came together collectively to ask the owner, the first New Zealand owner which was Sinead Beltran, who bought the company in 2020. To ask her if we could, together find ways to improve representation of Maori people, because we had had enough we, especially the seniors, we had seen what we'd done what how we'd represented Maori indigenous peoples. And we asked if we could change it and she was very open to change. So we created this metodi t this this model, and to put in a staff, the model is called puts yucky so it has its own name, and that's what I would encourage, if you were to think about changing the culture of your organization, is using those false support steps, but use the names of your own country and have your own people use the names of the indigenous peoples of your land. If you believe you don't have any, which I would argue you do. Then, you know, find ways that expresses this model in your own language and using your own concepts as well. But because I'm Maori I'm indigenous, these are the concepts I use. So is that a pool Jackie? One of the key things to do for for this model is to teach everyone, not just a few leaders here and there, everyone to be their own put tiaki so everyone needs to understand their history. And to work to improve representation of indigenous marginalized communities. Every single person from the receptionist to the goddamn CEO to the board member and the owner. They all need to do this. Because if you rely on one or two people and if you rely on the people of color or the indigenous one or two people in your newsrooms, you will fail to change and you will fail your own people as well as those communities. So equitable fair representation. What they did was more useful to their Maori the Maori language. Had a range of integrated actions, training programs, various measures, always, always use data, set your own measures. And those measures are simple things like okay, we had 120 articles were published today. How many of those were focused on Maori? How many of those Maori ones were positive or negative? How many included? female voices? How many included? Was there a story where there's stories on our disabled community, our rainbow community and New Zealand we have, we have the largest Pacific representation in the world. As here in our tiara. The numbers so love data, very, very helpful to tell the story of your discrimination. Projects love projects. So one thing we learned is multiple consistent actions over time. It's a long game. We're talking about changing hundreds of years of journalism practices. It's gonna take time to change. People get frustrated, people get angry people say you're not doing enough. But if you do multiple consistent actions over time, one day you'll look up go Well, shit, we've changed a lot. So Tamato porno was one of those projects we worked on. It was it took us two or three months. It took us three months 20 of us. We went in did a full scale look at everything from business sports, different papers across the country, like different regions across the country. The website we looked at every part of the business part of the news business, and we what did we find? Find and surprisingly, we found a Eurocentric monoculture of New Zealand's colonialism existed industry said exists in industry news or instruction and in our individual journalists as well, because we were over represented and Pakia which what New Zealanders compared to the working age group working group, age group and underrepresented in Maori and all other marginalized communities. We, most of our people also came from middle class backgrounds and we created negative social stigma and stereotypes against smiling. One of the stories we did was around child abuse. So one of our very clever reporters, Charlie Mitchell, he investigated how we had created and he found that over time, not just stuff, but other news organizations announced out or had also created racism, stigma and negative stereotypes about Maori and child abuse. New Zealand's child abuse problem, but they flipped it and it became a Maori problem. So in view abuse involving Maori children, adults were amplified abuse against non Maori children adults were muted. When I saw this story, I got very upset. I was upset for our non Maori children, because they deserved their stories to be amplified. As much as our Maori kids. Their stories were amplified. I was very angry at how we had muted they abusers, now Maori abuses, and so it was a very disturbing investigation and publication and it really struck home with our readers. Also, there's the we're talking about editorial coverage, like editors of newspapers, lead news leaders. They were writing articles and writing opinion pieces about Maori being the problem that the Maori leaders and Maori communities needed to sort out this child abuse problem. Not realizing that they had created this misinformation. And this is one of the problems with Eurocentrism and mono cultural newsrooms and colonial newsrooms is that you can create misinformation because you're using that just that one lens and non Maori abuse was an individual problem, not a society problem. Terrible, terrible our children