General, Justice Briar started with story decisis an important principle. In any case, and here for the reasons that Casey mentioned, especially so to prevent people from thinking that this Court is a political institution that will go back and forth, depending on what part of the public yells loudest and, and preventing people from thinking that the court will go back and forth, depending on changes to the courts membership. And what strikes me about this case. And you come, you're very honestly, saying, you know, we want you to discard the entire setup. And then even if you don't do that, we want to discard the viability line, which you've acknowledged again, today, Casey says is the heart the central principle of Roe. And so usually, there has to be a justification, a strong justification in a case like this, beyond the fact that you think the case is wrong. And I guess what strikes me when I look at this case is that, you know, not much has changed since Roe and Casey, that people think it's right or wrong, based on the things that they have always thought it was right and wrong for. So the the rationale behind those cases, has something to do with the autonomy and the freedom and the dignity of women to pursue their lives, as they wish to protect their bodily integrity, to make the decisions that are most fundamental to the course of their lives. And, and always in those cases, there was an understanding that there were important interests on the other side, in protecting life or protecting the potential for life, whether people saw it one way or the other way, and that there was a difficult question here and a balance to be made. And I mean, it strikes me that people, some people think those decisions made the right balance, and some people thought they made the wrong balance. But in the end, we are in the same exact place as we were then. Except that we're not because there's been 50 years of water under the bridge, 50 years of decisions, saying that this is part of our law, that this is part of the fabric of women's existence in this country. And that that places us in an entirely different situation than if you had come in 50 years ago, and made the same arguments. So I guess I just wanted to hear you react to that.