Governor no response MPP James Martin Martin here needs to learn if you eat mostly grandmother. Thank you, Mr. Hanlon. If you have Debbie statistic, the response in the UG Darwin, Darwin, Darwin. Darwin Darwin didn't start. Darwin. Darwin thinking is determined in pu Ace Hardware leaves no response in the UI, the Discover server, if you jpm interesting. Things don't if you care, but you tailor the response
and can you share your life? No response NPU in Esther, it comes to Kessler NPU in Naomi Sutton. Naomi give me one more time. Sila massage. Fast to your interview. Oh, Jeanne Cooper. proper, proper instructor
in the key receiving letter. No response in the queue Eric tumor. No response. Maybe you are done with the dogs. No response in the US Kyle manana used to live in beauty Terry Ross Thank you Mr. Ross. into V Stephen in Florida. If you who have a friend here in view X secure toes, no response NPY or your wind here in New Jersey and Phyllis. Madam chair it goes is their response to you because
they are thinking this block or if you hear any other some degree the other. Any since summing up the attendance anyone other than this the live
watching
I've got 50 cameras in this scenario and we will set up our team All right. Thank you so there's our region to region
not have been kicked out. Can I get a motion that a be accepted by Senate vote? Motion to accept by consent vote. Thank you Mr. Mark. Thank you. Ryan Murphy agenda has been the two corrections that previously identified.
All right. The recording secretary said that the minutes are out on the table for the December 17 and the January 28 meetings. Have you ever had an opportunity to have a glance over those
better two if you don't mind? Well, five years glance under ditional members is to introduce companies that were not here the earlier announcement you in the UK in the UK and that is Richard Taylor. Thank you. Anyone else coming in since the solving of the attendance so that's 16.
All right.
Ocean from the floor then did an opportunity to read the minutes that the minutes from both of December and January be accepted as presented unless someone sees something that needs to be corrected. motion so it's got my MA. Thank you service to your Roth. Thank you, Mr. Walz. All right. It's been probably motioned and seconded that the minutes from the December 17 2020 to January 28 2020 can be used. The general body be accepted as presented. All those in favor please raise your hand.
Is policy please raise your hand and anybody who's standing motion carries on. Do we have any elected officials and they always like to bring up information to us today. And never be able to be where we show it now says that I need to make that correction. We have no presentation scheduled for today but we do have some more appointments that we need to come through.
And we'll start with the tab for those leads did one person miss the festival. This person if he submitted said at the last meeting is a scattering of data here. Mr. Morris, would you come up to the microphone? Is that?
morning how are you? First of all, I'd like to say thank you so much for your interest in being appointed to the Beltline tag as one of occasional employees. I had the opportunity yesterday to speak to Congress and give them an overview of exactly what's to be expected with the Belmont era. Now under the way we normally do this, Mr. Morris is going to give you a minute to kind of tell us a little bit about yourself and tell us why you're interested and be appointed to go on to
like they're very much more about trying to investigate. Oh, sure. Thank you. Thank you. Good night because he called better
again this morning, Bob Morris. Live in just the park he will be live. I have lived in Atlanta. This go round. About three years. I actually grew up in 1000 years ago in the Forest Park. Bathroom on Tuesday nights we go to the varsity because that's the only place in town with a cover TV. You can watch Star Trek 1111 plan after high school and college and the Naval Academy's memory year the Navy sailing ships around and they pursue a career in corporate mostly in large corporations, PepsiCo Procter and Gamble, Cardinal Health those large corporations and in general my career was mostly adult leaders and developing intelligent organizations, large corporations and they have about kids, three of which are the Dallas into some of the year and along with the grandchildren and employed not full time in the corporate world anymore since I've retired from that but I do have an executive coaching practice that keeps me pretty busy. This this committee appeals to me and it's interesting for me is I'm interested in disease because I knew a lot about life. And there's a lot of development of the parking lot is happening on the Beltline that really do like impact me and members of my community and other communities. And I'd really like to be a part of that.
So much do we have any questions from the members? For Mr. Morris?
matter how grateful we are that those of us in the wider office accepting this assignment, he said Chief Executive Committee indicating py a consummate professional, consummate a witness the bipartisan across the table worker in the city are among the most powerful committees which is the cdhs committee and as he just said, chose report in the southeast quadrant as 7000 Multi residential units coming into what has been traditionally and are for community as such as shown in gray muscle guide should have worked with that person to not say how excited we are in the past it
can be very popular.
Mr. Ross.
You did ask the question. Yes. Mr. Morris, my question to you is, of course you'll have the opportunity to weigh in on some of the developments that is occurring around the BeltLine, particularly in the future too close to there. Let me ask you, what is your position when it comes to development? If you could just summarize because
that's a nice narrow question because I've been in consulting for so long and the consultant answer is it depends, right? I don't know that I can think it yes or no instrument development. I think that the city of Atlanta needs development, most most city development and responsible development and make sense in communities and make sense for the people in those communities. I think the delicate balance. I don't know that I have an answer but I think the secret is to try and find a balance between Destiny single family living, overpopulation, infrastructure, housing, city streets is complicated. So I think smart people are trying to figure out how to compromise.
Questions? No, okay. Then. What is your what is your preference on appointing Mr. Bach was to the deadline to
make a motion to approve the appointment. Second,
I heard the motion and who's the second? Okay. Thank you. All right. We have a motion on the floor that APEC as a worker is recommending approval of this divorce to the Beltline tag. All those in favor, please raise your hand and raise them. We got lights coming in this is hard to see.
So So that's sending a team
member to the augmented idiots.
Let me just finish it there. That's DC to Mr. Morris. Thank you so very much, and we will send your information over to Mr. solida at the BeltLine, and their office will contact you and his class I told you yesterday that he does say he does an orientation session so you won't be able to just, you know, throw him into the woods, but he will that that officer will be in touch with you,
but you're also playing with your guidance and support
and thank you so much for this Mr. Balls can be one second. So Misko Chesky come here. And who else was it that
just came in a little bit. Good morning. Good. Morning
Okay.
Start
I'm sorry, I was trying to make sure we updated the roster, and she reminded me that we had a vote of what was it 17 or 1888. Things? Those anybody opposing the motion in the bedroom standing. All right, thank you so very much and thank you for this generous
mentor that brings a member form to a tee. Thank you, Mr. Hall's
chair, going to remind everyone to speak directly into the microphone that the viewers on Channel 26 can hear. And when you have a motion and a second floor call for the discussion, in case anybody in the body wants to weigh in. Please
thank you and just get my marching orders from the chair of the committee. My name is Mr. Hall in the audience. Mr Barrett Russell come on up to the whitelist there's been Mr. Russell is one of the applicants for appointment to the public safety precinct or groups. Some of you that are new you may have heard about this but the public safety restriction is a condition amended the legislation for that condition. And when it was amended, they included Council number one included was known as three C one foods. There are six police precincts in the city. But what they did was they combined the precincts five and six. So essentially people in the workgroups there are never going to be five and a half has three appointments to each one of those portable groups. The criteria is, of course that the people that are appointed have to live in the precinct. You can't be insane, celebratory and be on the resolve for you really have to live in zone three. So Mr. Russell is one of the first people that submitted his application to be appointed to the public safety workgroup for some for he's a resident of in PUE, Florida, and we're going to give him a minute to tell us a little bit about ourselves.
Character on for soldiers and my figures involved. covered calls, such as the normal haul vehicles on the breakers. You know, just think of leaving trash and
we have a lot of issues with people coming in.
I guess maybe shoot handfuls. Code
three any questions for Mr. Russell? And if you do please come with the mindset of CBS and they can tell you about it
Mr. Wallace
Mr. Rough I'm just wanted to ask you. Why did why did you want to start by picking one the third one as well? I'm gonna work with APD is always interested in the neighborhood. We partner with different things and I just tried to keep in touch with people as long as possible. Its first
statement, Mr. Moser was recommended by Mr. Mr. Hunter, the crushing Hunter and I think it was time to write like to say something.
Morning, everyone, I'm rushing home to me up. I moved into my home. October 4 October 2014. very viable. For a couple of for me, he'd beat me to it but he beat me to our community. He was the one who told me about after that his first meeting. He was elected vice president of the association. He served two years with that person. Four years with me as president. He has always been able to watch initiatives and code enforcement issues. He has a background in construction as a superintendent, there are people who abuse that process of rebuilding and will do things renovations. He knows how to go to the tech open Academy. He makes getting documents. He's been successful in getting people to go live with these tiny little stockworks. He's committed to making sure it was protected. And he did this on his own as you do that. He continues to do that with the use of Vice President.
Thank you so much. Mr. Ross. It was good to have somebody to lead you to that extent to you've done a lot in your community. Mr. Sharp. Hey,
good morning for being here. My question is not to put you on the spot at all. I know that I will be playing on serving on the safety side. Are you familiar with a half a pack works and all of the things that we have going off great things that we have
going on
and only as prepping for my own reference, I want to be able to provide you as much information as possible. About apex, just wondering, so thank you very much for being here.
All right. Do we have any other questions for Mr. Also? If not an emotion from you motion to approve the appointment. MLOK Thank you, Mr. Hunter. Any discussion on the motion? Excuse me, madam chair. Okay. The second. The second question.
No discussion. Okay, well, we'll take the vote. All those in favor in hand when he was very useful to the zoning for public safety work. Please raise your hand.
Coming into it you can't see? Anybody staining. Alright, right. Thank you so much, Mr. Russell. We will send your name over to the Public Safety Commission for women to the public safety precinct for voters. Thank you so much.
This when are you ready? Yes. Thank you. Okay, you need to come down. Yes ma'am.
Okay, most of you here already know this when as the second vice president, but she's going to tell you a little bit about her role in her living with community and why she wants to be on that communities. Public safety before
they can enter like a city. There's several layers within the city councilor there's the public state. There's the commission, and now we have the advice. I'm really very excited because I think I was at a recent Neighborhood Watch training with chiefs Dinnerbone. And he says that many of you have ever commander on speed dial and that the troops absolutely had a major major on speed dial. That is what I'm hoping someone was the word. I'm not optimistic about these multi layers of conditions and committees in town advisory group. I believe a really effective advisory group is just that. That group has that commitment that major that country of lieutenants and captains on speed dial, lighten the mood, if you will, most has it's a reward to community for proportionately considered one of the most crisis driven communities in all the US proportionately the number of serious violent felonies in relationship to the population. I'm a firm believer that 21st 21st Century Policing involves that third prong of the community. My understanding is APAB itself is down third. So with that being said, I already have a very active relationship with my command. I think it partly because they see balance they see that I recognize the obligation to the community for the information for the service, but also, I believe you have insight into the role of the officers themselves. I sit as a public safety chair and the reason why I also sit on that lead citizens review board. This is my fifth year where I've had the opportunity to see where allegations of police misconduct also coming into it for my background is 25 years in the military to check for this legal great. I am an attorney by trade. And as such
an interesting Another early on, like a lot of what
I learned was local pro bono work but also be contract obligations as
a criminal defense attorney.
So we got to see both sides. I'm very, very excited because the cities are growing. There's a projection that by in the next two years our population is 800,000 candidates. This is 1.2 million. Nonetheless, we're excited about all of you and collectively we're going to bring quality of life for all of us in this way, Mr. Freeman
madam president said mainly just I want to say here in just a short time I known her she's been very inspiring. I see the passion that she has. But she's bad for almost everything I showed my face that she has a great knowledge of how the city works and how to work better. I just wanted to go ahead and give my support community.
Thank you so very much. You have anybody else and you have questions. As
well said and then Okay, thank you so much do any other metal churches just to you know start experimenting with
don't believe so at all. The current OBS which is the Office of Professional Standards, again, citizens have a complaint. They have two options, they can come to the civilian review board, or they can go to the internal review board here at the office. The current commanders major peak, who I work under for all of his tenure there at layflat. Again, I don't believe that there has been any conflict arise and acrp hasn't been felt before in major keeping the OBS commander. I think if there's conflict at all that ever arises, there was a term called recusal simply did that in two years? Yes, if
you recuse yourself from which board or above
may not necessarily be recusal from the board as much as recusal from whatever the issue comes before the body or vote for whatever occasion in the day, directed immunity.
Questions. They're not gonna get a motion that is Gloria Hawkins when it be appointed to the public safety briefing workgroups for some
three motion to support this.
Mr. Friend getting him signed for a lot. Thank you so much, Mr. Locke. Is there any discussion? Thank you so very much, and we're going to take the vote all those in favor recordings already August when to the obviously the precinct one with the zone three, please raise your
hand she got a try. At anybody losing and anybody who say all right. I'm sorry. You missed it. Going to go ahead and send Jeremy over to the public safety ministration in any condition for confirmation. All right. Resolutions, Mr. All of the resolutions come from cdhs. They've received so many zoning committee. And as I mentioned in the beginning of the meeting, the first one are 23 001 It says vote or fire but the cdhs land use and zoning. Division was wrong product so please strike out a vote. That also includes the remaining instructions on page 223 and 24 are all for first meeting and they should be in panic in the back and I did send out to everybody attached to the announcement about this meeting. Before we go further though, did anyone have any questions about them after they read them while we have the opportunity to do to ask Mr. Martin about Mr. Ross.
Hey, Joe. My question is about 23. The production of the SAP or special administrator when I read the resolution and same kind of way. Of course, maybe the number of saps goes out the door with with limiting saps, but I guess I'm concerned about this because without specific criteria, criteria reception it's hard to get plenty to rent, or get the City Council makes recommendations to the city council to direct planning to treat these saps with the vagueness of the word
do you have any chocolate with you? Yeah, well I guess.
Structures and structures.
Would you be the title of the resolution because we may have some people that did not
ensure it is a resolution calling for the Atlanta Department of City Planning to recommend reductions in the number of zoning structures for which administrative variations rather than judging variances will be granted as an element of the ongoing zoning rewrite process. So thanks for watching that we are designing the right process now and so we cannot respond to a specific proposal here. So it is more a philosophical guideline. For anyone who has interacted with Special Administrative permitting process it's readily apparent that it is badly broken. And an obvious fix for that would be to have fewer zoning structures that are trackable by that process. And that is essentially what the resolution calls for. This is also a follow on to prior resolution that we've asked and it's referenced here shorter than we had previously past calling for changes to the way Special Administrative permits are handled. Yes, it's honor to age are 84 or 81. Basically the process doesn't arrive and very resilient decisions. The reason for that used to there was no clear and obvious way for planning staff to say no to given a special administrative permit application. And absent that what ends up happening is a long delay followed by a yes to something that should have been yesterday. So in cases like that, what used to happen is that status referred to as cases of zoning adjustment and in fact, the system never does and so the resolution is necessary for that call for that prior resolutions as well. So I hope that answers your question protected. Okay, well, I guess that did interference question.
For you, Mr. Martin. If you want to give your email address so that if they have questions regarding the BI solutions, they can send those questions to
Sure. My email address is changed. Document Martin at m e dot g KTCH. Edu
Manager We also extend the meeting, invite as well as time communications with chs.
Yes, so this month, I know quite likely be linked to flying to town and evening in Cairo is pretty too posted in my absence, and it will once again be wildly ruined, which is where it was last month when I was out of town.
You stay down here didn't quite get the place.
The place is called wildly wildly and I will send out an email and
I don't have that. I'm sorry to say that is not that 170 570-520-5125 and I'm 21
Do we have any other questions for Mr. Parkman without the resolutions that you're going to be reading, making recommendations on? And taskforce reports three minutes per report. Do we have any of them are pointed away from the Senate senators here in your belt, Montana, a CRP
this man. Cory Locke is not an appointee, but director be stopped by our committee meeting this morning and let the distribution suppliers that kind of accounts, what types of allegations the board attends to rule overview of us so I'm going to put these out on the back table hoping that everyone will grab one every third Thursday of the month we meet we have a pending appointment Would you please raise your hand but it is our pending appointments for a CRP are down to have our own public for 4.1 T slots. And they have worked at a CRP for companies that were down for only three. And so we're looking forward to Adrienne and I believe that was one of the number two it's only my manager because we should be one is Adrian Kohler from indie UX and become a third individual results. But again, just we are off allowing people to have Side Car Warranty please look us up. Great work we're doing and we sit down 21st Century Policing we also see the profile of water there needs to be officer accountability
for new care for a new MPU standard. Mr. Kevin Williams coming up is being assessed for that swap or introduce S C. Z as in Zebra. This age of your program from MBU X is being processed with s acrp G through L is vacant. Mr. Dr. quitter resigned in January of this year. So as voting member delegate or alternate can release consider sitting on a CLB if you're interested please let me know. That that's for me use G through L to decrease that you would need to live in apdg through one of those can be used to represent all right. Um, bill right now we have Mr. Rondeau gravel his process, his operation is being processed.
Mr. Morris approved today Mr. Romano for quite some time reside here so now we actually have six vacancies on the bill Montek. We have to build those vacancies, ladies and gentlemen. So I'm going to ask did you consider being appointed to the Bill Clinton as an AIPAC representative?
We have the one slot available on the public safety legal administration commission and on receiving the agenda Mr. Michael Cole is actually the I think the job is the nine lines are for the city has to be considered when that I'm going to have to talk to him to see if there have been some changes in that. Chair.
I just wonder, are there any conflicts with Mr. Paul in the city of Boise and several others submitted?
Well, I think that that probably is part of the issue. And I'm going to have to go back to the public safety saving commission to find out for sure. I think that was a question so and he is actually an employee here at the city of Atlanta as the nightlife resource so that might be a conflict but I would definitely find that out. Morning.
several board members are actual employees of the city. We have the city's solicitor you have chief of police, several different agencies, police staff on that committee. This commission is made up of city employees so I would wonder how that would come into play. And lastly, are there different types of employees?
You know, one thing that I do know and obviously I'm going to have to check on, on question at hand is you ran into this when we're trying to point someone to the acrp. I'm sorry, to the public Public Safety Commission. The question came up was because he was a city employee, for people that are firemen. And that gate is able to sit on this commission. And we finally got to come down they're not gonna be able to not be a problem. But you have to be confirmed by his by the cheating firewall. We have to give them permission to do it so that your bill ecrb is sort of a different kind of animals if you forgive the terminology. So we have to always ask before we appoint somebody to do because if you're city employees, sometimes there can be conflicts, and they do have some strict rules and regulations were nice and orderly. I will find you know about Mr. Call as the number one is our Mr. Friend.
Thank you, Madam President. I just I do have concerns not just because
we were they worked before, but through the commissioners for I believe that adding a city employee to such a sensitive area to public safety, as well. I believe that it causes a conflict of interest. And I believe that they can make the public lose a little more faith in the actions that we take here
committee. Okay, well, why are you standing here? Let me read this to you. I did not print out the interpreters. We printed out part of it. For the Public Safety Commission. The appointing office is the amount of assistant solicitor or designee Fulton County solicitor or designee, Atlanta Public Defender or designee, city attorney or designee and then it goes down to the amount of planning advisory board and we have four people already appointed. Then central Atlanta progress or designee Atlanta citizens review board center for Deeth disease control here at random Board of Education, a martyr designee and a police policing alternatives as chairperson of the Planning Advisory Board public okay, then that's then the mayor's office. As to So, ultimately there are a lot of city organizations on the commission. So I don't know whether and honestly, my way of thinking he is, he is this default is the nightlife SAR over that condition that the setup officer set up last year to address the biometric issues, the crime and everything that happens around our nightlife in the city. So I really don't see where he would not be allowed to sit on that but on average,
about three to five minutes before it is actually agreed with the political party. I want to some people in the job that will be appointed for Avatar department, I believe was was to make the vice chair of his MBU tissues into the chair and be extremely capitalistic.
And so I think is is it to dance to dance parents during the hurt Andrew Anderson and Eric tumor, they have all been appointed by the PAP to that condition.
I appreciate that. And I do understand the point. So I just, my whole thing is if we're supposed to be keeping tabs on an entity, and you're advising an entity that's conflict of interest to have that entity in the middle of archives, that's all I have to say.
What's his bad news?
The good news is brings me I really don't remember where he's been. He's been involved in city government for quite some time. So 10 years as the editor of a Discord is our bread and butter committee.
Last thing is
a that was that was the commission 19. The commission because they amended the ordinance remember last year, and they gave us an additional four slots, they give us additional fifth slot, and as a PM, they will consider appointing him in that slot. We discussed that. Campaign.
Karla came to us. After you read her list, it gave me a little more conservative understanding that the mayor's office does have to appoint members to that body. And so it seems like the ballot set is supposed to be achieved would not quite be there by appointing another member from his staff or his TV will start read full report to this particular committee. While I'm friends with Mr. Paul, I believe it would serve in this role quite well. It does get me concerned to the balance that is supposed to be achieved on this committee.
Session grant that the mayor's two slots are showing as faith and it is quite possible that the mayor is appointing him in one of those slots as well as I have to do go back and follow through on this to
find out exactly the guy represented properly for me, that would be the best route to take kind of Mr. Ed,
I guess I don't understand why you wouldn't be the biggest absentee district while being here. Generally speaking, if an applicant does seem to be appointed to something you stand at the podium and make a station and when we would ask questions, it was opinions and in here so
the reason that I honestly have not heard from him and thinking that there is a possibility that the shift has placed him in the mayor's category and I don't know yet that's why so I'm gonna have to chip in your soul as I mentioned probation
if he has seen this appointment to certainly invite him to our next meeting and he has not seen the sweater that is relevant. Mr. Ross
Yeah, I'm gonna go down triple down. Machine machines guides as well as callous comments. A pet has an appointment to the board, but a pet represents good residents within the city of Atlanta and a band members represent the residents within their NVQs and so by adding a city employee, again it it defeats the objective of having this position open to a resident who is whose paycheck so, yeah, so I'll double down. My next question is from Atlanta. Yeah, I know groups is to get the US as well.
No, no one says
so just any resident can come in thanks.
Eric Right to the UK. After hearing the initial request did not come from the chair. That makes me concerned that somebody from the commission or someplace else requested that this person pointed out and I wouldn't suggest that this will be resolved in a timely manner means more than anything else because it just sounds like there was something that went along with this the lawful process. So normally, I'd share revenue. And this came from another entity to say please appoint this guy. I have a slight problem with that. And, again, we haven't heard this community involvement in terms of the entity news or the level of organization so without knowing more,
please understand as I said, I just got the list. This list is as of February 6 2003, and the mayor slots are there so it's not impossible now. He's been appointed in the mayor slot.
So I would recommend really striking from our agenda apparently, are we're going to make the motion that was striking from our agenda, until we find out that he has actually been requested by our chair to fill this slot.
It has been properly moved. Okay. Second, okay. Do we have a motion on the floor for Mr. Turner and a second from Mr. Ross, that remove Mr. Lambert policy under the Public Safety legal administration. Commission until we get clarity regarding this particular slide we're restating
my motion was by being removed, not seeking clarity, everything removed and until such time that I want to share yourself makes the appointment. Right, Greg. From a security so
can you get that Madam Secretary? Yes, ma'am. Monday. All right. All right. You heard the motion. Are there any is there any discussion? I don't have one. One more question.
This Mr. Paul's absence today not already achieve what the motion states. Is there anything that says that we will be bringing Mr. Paul back because he was not here today.
To be honest with you. I had missed a call on the January agenda and on this agenda, and I sent to him personally, the same emails that are sent to all candidates that are to be confirmed and that's why I would say off the bat is since the mayor's swamps became vacant. That is probably
because the question is what was the farming asset? That's the remain on this agenda. To which you
know, it was not it was not my intention to put him on the agenda a period of time without compensation. And I did it this time, because last month we just you know, kind of asked him because we met on a different day. So when I put them back on. This definitely is in my company you and Beth she is my UVU secretary. I'm sorry, my community association secretary, but in my discussions with her, her job has her traveling quite a bit and why she is one dedicated community worker. I'm going to have to take her name off until we can figure out a better way because she's out of town again this week and she was out of town last month. So no. This morning, everybody that on today was pretty much prepared to see what our recent emails to all the candidates and this morning, okay. Yes, ma'am.
It's about insolvency, any other members that come into the room.
The second vice chair would like to know as anybody come in since we did the first roll call for the border. There's
a motion on the floor and
the motion to move the name is Mr. Turner, is it necessary to do a motion says I would like to put it back on a format there. Okay, Mister Thank you. All right. Motion. All right, we have a motion on the floor to remove Mr. Michael Cole. From this swap
period. Pretty much. restate the motion for me. To make sure we get it right. Then we also can afford to remove Mr. Fowler from the public safety in the commission. Immediately in reference to point of order.
Is to restate starkly interesting.
progression. practical use of public safety and labeled administrators to measure is to the motion is to remove Mr. Michael Hall from consideration my opinion and less madam chair we appoints him at a later time really standing before the board at a later time, and it's her appointment as opposed to a circuitous appointments request.
Did everybody understand the motion? Okay. All right. Is there any more discussion on the motion? Mr. Casper?
Just a couple of points. For clarity information, the cloud the title of the commissioners the Public Safety Commission was established in 2021. The latest list of its members removes all available all direct mayoral appointments and that was accomplished with a resolution 22 dash r dash 4570. So I believe what you're reading, Madam President, what's the public safety compensation committee? If you want to double check the list that you reference from February 6?
No, I was referencing the last one is the most important news that they sent to me
can you reference the number that resolution?
Continue to move forward and come back so that was
it this
video Does anybody else
know I do about 22 References Council resolution between the International Art Festival is 45 7070 which is the one that I just referenced which does not include being a direct arrow points those were struck me and the past five appointments as well as the chairperson of the Public Safety Committee.
What was the title of the day she put into showing us the title it doesn't say still said How to safety people. So it's a presentation
by the public safety and illustration committee of the city council. But it's in reference to the Public Safety Commission
Okay, so somehow I finally got it so, if you would have never scratched up in any way but you're saying this officially is the Public Safety Commission.
Mr. Taylor, just share with me a score of a public safety commission
manual semi discussion
yes. Please remember to make sure I understood the most important part a lot of discussion. My understanding it was the motion was to completely remove Mr. Paul from any consideration in the APAC consideration as an appointed because that
yes, that was emotion. But the question that came up was added on here and speed of administration
or emotion, emotional support removed them from consideration on this current schedule and less around the chair for her to reconsider and appointment as her choice as opposed to any choice being handed to her. And she being asked to and I'm only going on this on what I've just learned in this meeting. So I don't know what it sounds like when someone submitted is not necessarily part of a task and say, Hey, I would like this person to point out my understanding, and that's why I took the action because I don't feel that it is an external appointment from somewhere else and potentially appointment from there.
So I'm gonna repeat the motion. And so we can go ahead and take the vote. The motion is to remove Mr. Paul from consideration by APEC unless the chair comes back at a later time and go question. All right, it was pretty much done. Thank you. Okay. Is there any further discussion about the motion that everybody understand? If not the ability to take a vote? All those in favor of the motion please raise your
hand? Evening.
17 Anybody knows? Please raise your hand. Anybody who's standing 123 Guys see those guys? All right. So that motion carries 70 02 is made on December. Additional members of our thinking back Okay, so
just wonder conference in the world was that well met so we don't have to keep checking account numbers, people coming in. And it's a sign that she has signs that are difficult,
and I do want to remind everyone to please sign in when they come in. Thank you. Alright, so that completes the test.
Make sure you're off we'll be at LRB. And go quick. The interview the desire to do not recommend the denial for liquor license. Your job is not does not stop here. It is. It is extremely important that you make your parents at the LRB healing so that the LRP board can hear your or the community's side for for the rationale for your decision. Without that we have nothing to go on. And the only one who was buried his dad to get themselves and vote. We always ask them what why do you think the community voted to deny? We don't know or more actually, one turning actually stated that they did it because they had nothing better to do, which I had, you know, as an MP person i i toward the new occur, you know, because we're all volunteers. We got better things to do than just to not have a license. It's all so when you do vote to deny, please come make sure someone comes representative for you, or the community's position on that. That's so very important. Geico. LRB has a license Review Board.
Mr. Mr. Rossum in order for the community to have the same work in front of it that the LRB or Lieutenant collars offers other than open records requests. Are we not entitled to the same information without, you know, with maybe redacting certain privileges information, maybe focusing on reporting, or we're not entitled to the same weather events before the LRP the community
or the application itself as a packet, and then the fact that there is some proprietary information that APAB will not release to the license review board or the appeals, but the majority that is available, we'll record or is actually available during the paperwork for the process in that application.
Just the one example there was this one applicants license can be suspended by the state but they're in the same way they do an open records request to get a copy of that suspension. Is that was that accurate?
Well, that would have been in the state that whatever came through the Superior Court with the state's license,
some kind of darkness so we wanted to copy those totals, to an open records request to get a copy of
Sure. Sure enough, that's not to fill it or add to that is good sake. That's why
I guess the question do you think as a real estate, we have the record, why can't we get one record? No, but whatever they have in the record in addition to the education, of Notice of Suspension by the stage, any reports that you have any reports of activity that improves the credibility of the wire
yo I can't answer that question for you.
So I have a question, can we get some sort of a back sheet or guidance on what the what conditions and what what the rules are around liquor license transfers and in new new different licenses, both in terms of one of the reasons that what reasons can be cited. If you if you want to deny it, and also what can be asked because I've come into where people are asking for a community benefits agreement before they will allow a liquor license. And I'm not sure about the legality of that. I would like some guidance on that as well. Just the court order,
as
far as
we do appreciate you being here. There's been a lot of confusion around who's allowed to speak in these meetings and who is here, there's been a lot of mayhem around who's allowed to participate, at least at this portion of this meeting, or who is I just want to make sure that we're being fair to everyone. Is this portion of the meeting only for voting members to provide comments? Yes.
Mr. Ross, you know, of course, on Ha, we're working on the MRP rules and regulations. And I'm currently an agent. He was saying though she's asking for affection. I know that would be something that would be just extremely difficult. But would it be too much to ask you as a PAP appointee? To kind of close the meeting, that you're identifying issues that the US are not handling the way they should? Would it be too much to ask you to just give us those things? Just a quick sheet of those things that most of the GPUs are not doing right. But that's the best practices so we can include those in our best practices because as a chair, you know, we have to come to you with my community. That is like, totally. I want to say just describe, I guess is the best quarter. So as the chair I'm trying to stay in good standing and calm them down and report to you all, what the issues are. And, you know, try to maintain a peaceful situation. I would like to have that myself. Just pass out to them who says, Alright, you can do this. And not necessarily you can't do this but best practices.
Yeah, I'm not sure that we can construct something like that. I mean, the only requirements to apply for the license in the city of Atlanta, is that you'd be a law abiding citizen. You don't have any prior convictions and pay the application fee. And you have a location that's basically beyond the requirements. And so, of course, one size does not fit all but some places have become public nuisances, or even public safety hazards within communities and the state, the city and APD will come in and remove their license.
Mr. Boss, Mr. LRP, is if I'm not mistaken, one of the courses for uni University is no,
no Laila roads Department of City Planning. Good morning, everyone. We did attempt to get back to our 2020 catalog. We did have a class on the permitting process, I believe the name of it was and it was a course designed to teach the public how the license review work process works as well as the Special Events process. We were unable to produce that class for multiple reasons. I do have a note to ask during my report, if there were suggestions from the body on how we can do a better job at communicating the responsibility to the NVQs. Mr. Ross, just point out every month I pointed out very regularly to the FAQ is not just for alcohol licenses, but also for special events, applications and can use it I know this is a little bit more than what you asked but since I have the microphone, you don't mind we cover this regularly. It's covered in all chairs training. It's written correspondence. I remind people when they make the mistake my team reminds people when they make that mistake, but those applications cannot be deferred. Without the applicant diverting the application. Not only that, thank you, Mr. Ross. Not only that, as you pointed out, if you vote anything other, excuse me, if you brought anything other than to support you have to show up at a license review board meeting. If you voted to defer, it's not going to be deferred. If you're not at the license review board that matter will be heard without your NP use input period. That is simply the way it works. Whether it's right or wrong, good or bad. That is the way it works. It has worked that way. For some time now and in the US are missing their opportunity to be heard by not attending disease and its people and to medicine and one additional layer folks who
want to work. You have to put the mind to the toner myself
and then I just wanted to come in and just support them. The Neighborhood Watch program also provides the
student where the arrows came. I can see here the English learner I apologize to our
rapid chair. I think if you're seeking bullet points for LRB. It might be better if we were to be LRB himself as opposed to the representative and because of that they could be unfair to the military. Trying to delve into again.
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to make give you an impression that that was what I was asking. I was just asking about the points that he makes. When he comes to our meetings. He always tells us things that give us an idea and I just wanted him to jot those things down so that everyday can easily get a copy and know the same thing. That's all just
to summarize what I'm suggesting anymore to give an official request to the LRV and ask them to do high level. It might serve the community better if it's coming from the official entity, as opposed to a member I don't know. That's just a suggestion. Oh, thank you, Mr.
Chair. Actually, I wanted to make a motion that we sent a correspondence to the advisory board request for information in preparation for the BTC as a faction where they have for us to VIPs and to regulate it's already making the
Western Pacific Ocean already first first so we get a second resolution on
that then try to believe what we're asking for it's already in place. I'm recommending that all of you. I think it's presented quarterly twice a year in the neighborhood of flex training. In that training a component of it is the LRP I promised all of you it will be disseminated within the week or week any discussion
because it's a motion so first of
all, first of all, let's deal with the motion. Okay. And would you please restate the motion just because I'm like that interesting.
I made a motion that few chairs that have correspondence to the advisory board requested information of fact sheet or some kind of document that can help assist us and that correspondence be brought back to us and we work with TCP to send it out to the abuse
and totally can I believe I can get a second for the motion. We have a motion that we have to do it that feels like alright so contract
right the motion is on the floor. Is there any discussion? The spirit will sustain the standing order yes to
add I have found that we communicate with voice voices review board in writing is problematic and the motion was to send a correspondence to the board. But it's not clear to me who the correspondence would in fact be addressed.
To the director Executive Director.
Yeah, this thing to the washer that will go to the facility harder with the Chair of the life of the reward and she does not have email addresses that same chair she would have to get her personal or work Angeles. The best approach to life is through salt on energetic calm. Zone one environment. Calm peyote, PDR. Co.
Chair. My intent was as individual professional staff member, one employee, not a volunteer. So if I can augment my emotions manager in response to the common cause. Mostly information affection on behalf of outcome in preparation so we can work with the policy plan to send that out to us
All right, so the person that second the motion that was Miss Jones is Charles Can you still set the motion as he submitted? Yes, ma'am. Yes, ma'am. I do. Thank you so much. Okay. Is there any further discussion about the motion is when you finish Mr. Martin Well, I was
going to add to my bed that it is the intention that this communication is seen by all members of the board than sending it to the tech oversight party that in fact, communications by obscenity terracotta has to show the court have not been sure what happened rather ended with the dedicata rules. So
what's for the high school board? Yes. So my intent is not for them to come across from KC and I'm going to be teaching about how we can bring back this event to our members of the PS if the
intention is to engage with the Kennecott are going to be dichotomous equilibria addressing efficiency making communicate with board that they have
no intention because then it goes directly to Gen Con. Alright, any further discussion about
pushing this material for these
you will miss the enemy because you're actually mentioning the
I'm just mentioning. Ready, source ready source.
And that's what I was about to say I'm ready to go shut off again. But she's talking about the neighborhood watch. Here's a phone with a neighborhood watch and just
when there'll be a couple of million dollars, I'm talking arising out of that training is a 667 page, what I believe is being referred to as the punch so to speak, and I have possession of that and I promise this course of this week will disseminate it into the into the communities when you sign up for that training. They're being bullied by a more comprehensive presentation from Sergeant Thompson and Lieutenant Cotter. Again, all of what these requirements are laid out in chapter 10 of the ordinance. And again, they derive no narrative. It's simply bulleting. The requirements that were laid out in chapter two similar to everybody else,
because very, very few people overall attend the neighborhood watch. They have them every year and I think at best what is about 2025 people that attend so really does need to know a lot of the communities will be considerably over 242 to 245 communities and all of the communities need this training. Even as in chasers, we can not disseminate all of the information and try to explain to communities what they can, what they can use as reasons for denial and what they can't use. Everything stems from emotion about your community and you want to get that emotion out. And you can't do that with the MRP you've got to be pretty much in the legal arena. So it's kind of difficult to make people understand that when they don't want something in their communities simply because we just don't want it we have a number of them, quote unquote, you have enough convenience stores we have another liquor stores. So if you are able to encourage more of your community associations, presidents and vice presidents to attend the neighborhood watch training, please do so that will help them significantly but my past experiences I've attended it and I think it was a holidays post pretty much every year to turn out the Skype good. The communities removed okay. Now, the motion is still on the floor. I'm assuming that there's no more discussion on the motion, right.
I just want to make that very often we assume that in the chairs or alternates are delegated to our community as the information based on processes that are in place that are supposed to work. What we're finding across AP US records for the LRB to reference our MP to members of the MPs who don't always know this information, so I do think it's
important that we all
have this proper information. And this is one of those cases where I'm getting multiple MPDU meetings and I've cried from Oculus and saying, Hey, St. George APAB representative. The point I'm making is that there are already some methods or ways in terms of communicating that can be used ie to show up to the MRP meetings, but I think it's very important that we go that extra mile an extra step and send out back direct communication and be very explicit about what we're asking, I think attaching it to an email or adding it at the bottom of an email. That's great. But I do think that many times people are not reading and we need to be very explicit about what we're asking or what we're what we're requesting.
Alright, so let's resume the motion. The motion is that I sent a letter to Lieutenant Carr APD requesting that they submit to a pair of fact sheet that we can get to DCP ensure that all employee use receive that information. Is that correct? Yes, ma'am. So let's take a vote. All those in favor of the motion would you please raise your hand?
This lecture, we have been okay. On those opposing please raise your hand. Okay, one two and anybody have stayed please raise your hand
I mean, did you see
four 511 to 411
to four eyes. That motion carries okay Mr. Kessler.
Kessler at you and share Bylaws Committee. We have not done that since we just got a new for shipment the last meeting. We do have a meeting scheduled which will be Friday March 3 at 2:30pm locations to be determined that there will be a physical location and to the best of our ability we will make it available online as well. That is the purpose of the committee. As always, if anyone has any recommendations, suggestions on bylaws, amendments please feel free to send them my way. My email address is AIPAC at MPU Atlanta dot orgy
open to the general bodies
in accordance with the Georgia Open Meetings Act and city ordinances Yes, this meeting will be open to anybody and everybody.
And you can notice that on all notices that are sent out to do state that all APEC meetings in accordance with Digital Ocean readings open to the public in order to see on a fairer Mr. Martin did you have an additional
This is CHS and land use and zoning.
Yes, right. I think the resolution is pretty well covered and I mentioned the meeting date and location for wildlife route and the HR section. So do I don't think I can get to
thank you so much. The Transportation Committee the previous to previous Chair of the Transportation Committee told us last week that he no longer wanted to be the chair of transportation committee. So as a result, I had to appoint somebody. So the parliamentarian indicated that I could appoint my Vice Chairperson. Since and that's exactly what I did. So the first and second vice chairs will be handling the Transportation Committee until they decide they want to continue to do it or until they find someone that they would like for us to point as the chair of that committee. Either one would like to say today
no, other than a learning curve, but very exciting. Cities. My understanding is there's a new transportation Commissioner. So it's the time to get someone new information starts to flow. It's alive and just so so sweet. I'm looking forward to working with a lover and I think she's already sent out a couple of communicates. Again, I'm just I'm onboarding her. But I'm excited
that they couple of things that we'll be sending to visit with. Martin has to be initiated. It's visually zoom. And it has an interactive link there that I think that you'll find very useful for your interviews. So when you get back with us take a look at leaves is a lot of information but the interactive link off deficiency role playing is very beneficial. Additionally, I don't know whether you've all had the opportunity to see it but the original plan for light rail from what is a member of to every model issued is that they did that and there is that the rapid the bus is the rapid out every call. So you'll get information about that. So what that change is and if you remember when we voted within the difference, we voted on that one of the things that we actually voted on that they would install LibreOffice from manager to begin with here. And now Martha says that they have taken a look at it and they find that it's going to be an issue for the communities there if they do that rather plus. So you'll get information about that I was
listening as was mentioned, I did send out an email the other day with the information about transportation. A couple of things that matter. If there are things that you want to know and have concerns with please respond to that email and I will be reaching out to the Transportation Department. There's been a change in leadership. And I'll see if they could put together what they used to do. And that was a list for NPU of all the road work that is being taken care of in the city of Atlanta is very important. And we're looking at the hotspots streets as well. Thank you
Thank you. Committee on a pair of struggles.
Good morning, Chairman Ross and end committee, as I said met this morning and emotion coming out of committee. But I do want to record that we did read the letter before the full Council this month, addressing the amendment to review Oregon, which of course restricted any boundary changes the US had to go through the city council. And our position was that even though that the mandate well it takes it without MPU or citizen participation or input on this, that it was simply a slippery slope and that they should not do this again.
Can be receiving feedback coming in the council.
Oh, only that only that day and it was all positive feedback. And that was specifically from basic military Matt Westmoreland and Michael really good blog. posts things. The first motion by Committee today is that we'd make it motion that the next executive committee meeting agenda included discussion regarding the conduct slash misconduct of the APEC president. And when you would like that placed on the executive board's agenda for the next meeting
that is motion as
you've heard the motion becomes out of committee. I mean, is there any discussion?
Madam Chair no
Would you mind repeating the motion please. Now getting the motion, the motion is on the videotape because it is at the next executive board committee mean that the discussion regarding last placed on that agenda Mr. Martin?
Yes. I think the parliamentarian since the executive committee, I mentioned adopts its own agenda at that meeting. Is it appropriate for us to be doing this here now?
Is this a recommendation?
No. This is a motion. We're asking the general body to ratify it. So read the executive committee. We'll bring it in before the general body because the general body has the final sale no man.
Understood. So this is correct. Yeah, that was it. Mr. Morris? I'm sorry. I get
it looking for one committee so that I can have the
Committee on it and to maintain the nation's executive.
I understand you're saying so what I'm saying that's my recommendation. It is not a decision from this body. But my short opportunity. Motion is So Madam Chair, you can decide to do that but it comes back to that emotion and then the body's wishes. For the process. You choose to override the decision of a chair that is a process and that the chair conduct the lecture covering interest. So you may want to step down from presiding over this membership, which will be slower, but it does give you the right to engage with me.
I don't think everyone understands the motion on the
floor is for the
property committee have a question. Exactly.
paraphrase it in my way just to make sure I understand that the comedian is asking that we asked the body to add that we asked that this body of the comedian ecaps Motion to require an executive meeting that allegations of misconduct is the meeting and Chairman forwarded that meeting is ended
conduct slash misconduct that is correct.
The motion on the floor. So actually it's up to you to decide whether you believe that motion is proper knife. And if you decided the motion was not proper, I believe there may be a motion to overturn the decision of the chairman just now need to get through to Canada for that but I'm advising the decision as a parliamentarian. I believe in this problem for Me too. Me too late for business or for like human relations
point. That's the chair. Have the right to recuse herself. Are you automatically assigning this function to a second? Mice?
The chair has the right to accuse himself. I'm assuming
that acute patching recused herself well, she
didn't she didn't leave over and things up until the price change and based on my language, I assumed that she was no
more I don't think there's room for assumption. The chair has to state that she is handing down parameters for this matter to the second price on the first price of belief. Please correct me
if I'm wrong. Because, Madam Chair, are you recuse yourself from this matter?
Please? What is the authority or you're certainly prevented accusers.
Again, about serving and recommending well, because then the motions are better. And then she denies the motion about herself. That in itself could be
emotions, disagreements, questions and
it can be an appearance of a conflict of interest. The men in the Bible agree. So in my opinion as the commentary that was recommended to the chair just for the appearance there that she may want to step away from this. This does this memo and allow the first vice president to chair this, but I wasn't even aware that does become the right to move forward. And to bait and switch I remember that as well as
everything else saying straight to rationalization
and the chair can see fit to administer this domain unwisely as she has done in so many instances. So I would recommend that the chair stay home to this and follow through with the process and procedure and have the body have the ability to review if there is any Miss dunes
I used to wear the motion see if the subject of the motion that the motion is before the body. The body is a day on day.
Mr Lamont Miss Phillips English should recuse herself in this matter.
The circumstances so that we can move me forward. I will recuse myself and let this lever handle this particular issue as soon as possible. Thank you
Okay. Are you asking me to sit here literally make a decision about this.
So now the actual presiding officer and as the presiding officer there's a motion on the floor if you'd like to restate the motion, but there is a question about whether the motion is proper or not. And yes, we can make that decision.
Okay, please restate the motion.
The motion is to place on the agenda for the executive committee recommended to place on the executive committee's agenda, a discussion about the conduct or misconduct of the President.
And I can make the decision whether or not it's placed on the executive committee's agenda,
no doubt you make the decision whatever kind of motion is proper that
I will make the decision that the motion is proper.
Alright, thank you. Chair.
I still would get to the recovery site
that matter better. That is this basic officer came up with a motion before the price officer to kind of cheat because she was she can decide I want to look at that motion. Normally motion but my second being called out because they are proper or intent or form although but it is always the right design officer will say what they believe to be as confident not and therefore the need is not proper, and no one opinion position the chair we move on to the next item on the list is the same the same total revenue different disagree than the last day that was the other way. Mr. Palmer said it was not. I mean, let me disagree with that. I said that it was not that the Bible has the right to say they appeal the decision of the chair, which will then be your vote and ultimately the decision remains it's about they have finals.
Why is it that the parliamentarian was unable to move because our parliamentarians
authority of any decisions? We recommend based on what I was the water bylaws and for this body to state policy in the state of Florida does that apply to the school and its recommendations arthropathy decisions and recommend and also because I'm elected by this body? I sort of include the president, officers and everything.
It just seems like it's emotional. Rather than putting it in the hands of the first devices simply could obtain the motion to the floor. That's exactly what we're doing. Yes, without the
second vice president, the chair spinning she has the floor.
Hi my name is an opportunity for the body to vote. And that's what I'd like to see happen.
So there has been a motion out of committee so does not require a second sort of material or it's fallen out of that chair this portion of it. And so therefore, we are now when should we take the motion motion Madam Chair, we will go into the main discussion. And if there is no
yes, the discussion first.
Yes, ma'am. Have to restate the motion. If you want to know that. You can restate the motion the motion before the Committee on a perhaps not required a second is to have a discussion placed on the executive board's next agenda about the conduct or misconduct of the President this.
Discussion? Yes, it's open for discussion. If you have a discussion, please go to the microphone.
One. What I want to say for this is that limits can be contentious and I want to get ahead of that. Everybody will be allowed to speak just twice we don't want to follow at all the members can speak and we're going to call it comes to speak a big one to you. You need to get out of the chair before you speak.
Okay and only members can speak that is correct. Okay. Sir, you're NPO
Kiowa Colorado in the US. Mr. Ross. I just want to ask since this is coming out of your community, are there any examples
or points of concerns that
you would like to give to this body as for the need for the motion?
There was quite a bit of concern as to a lot. But primarily, the the question of the kind of president comes from some of the decisions that they make some of the justifications for those decisions, and some of the things that she's put in writing towards the other members of the board. So are there any examples? Well, she did make a disparaging remark about millennials that she put a bracket in an email. She also did not be appointed to public safety chair, but the criteria that she used, every chair was it felt. So Assistant, her reasoning was inconsistent. And, among other things, we spent quite a bit of time talking about it this morning. So and again, it's not about removing her. It's about having a conversation about this getting it laid out and transparent. So that you can get this thing resolved because we don't want to see you continue in this direction.
Okay, it just makes no sense. To me to ask here is that the Committee on gamepad asked you to ask that the executive committee hold a session or committee deals with conduct misconduct and the Chair mentioned said seems like we've said we could say Bobby Are you believe for the executive committee to commit at a certain date to hold hold a committee meeting based on allegations of conduct or misconduct that is the synthesis of securities just go directly to the body and say that in committee in committee today, we had a discussion, the body decided that we would like the Executive Committee to meet on these issues. Simply put that out there and say that that is what we decided we'd like the body to die without any other layers of again, that is the question whether this body should adopt the motion that came out of committee and he had to have the executive committee discuss allegations of conduct misconduct to dismiss them. Okay, moving forward. Mr. Arm.
Yes, you are good. Edie. I believe we have our strategic planning and whatnot thing coming up for the week. Would that be a more appropriate venue for this discussion and he's
agreed where ultimately my daughters are so is to charge
upon what is plentiful nation right now. I do not think that. That is what you should do that everyone should do that that is planning strategically about the board itself and there's a well packed agenda. I'm sure in terms of what we need to cover
not knowing what your actual allegations are. But if there is allegations of some sort of misconduct, it would seem to me that the executive board is not the place to go with this. Man going to ask the question, if it did go to exactly what is the resolution in order to render the request is seeking. The next part is people exceed the airfield was prior to going on that it should come before the entire volume, as opposed to the executive board. And maybe a special session should be called by the second vice chair to hold such an amazing hearing, I guess you would call it because the executive board I believe is the right place for this. I believe it is followed for the entire audience to hear and just discuss and then their recommended remedies actually included in the motion. So what specularly request is to request an amendment and seek remedy to this action and also bringing people in tight.
So finally, we just want to point of order, according to our bylaws, and I can give you the exact section of the meeting, which is.
Ultimately, one person cannot constitute a meeting that has to.
Whenever we're sitting on one of
these lands, so upon request of at least eight members of the board, the board is going to be required to decide that that's what it takes to cause a single screen to make sure that every guy's information is
contained. And will be initiated from the gym. To taking the fibers
of the board, which is a bad decipher, wouldn't have a special call meeting about a topic that
was initiated isn't initiated. flamboyantly, we come to the same
so what we have done that attach to the database initiated the email and then once you have once you have, you know the people who are on board that you can issue the call for was different, what really, of course you need to work with the departments that you're planning for making sure that those that are in the scheduling and the locations. But it has to be done from the moment you have consensus but also a special call meeting the agenda is just that you're planning on to this publish to the public.
That's next day. And so we can still email talk initially, wherever that point.
Point of order Mr. Tumor will be done by putting this item on the agenda and devoting capital time to various items for the body on the attended does not have to be special.
Attention and no other business will get done but
I think it's the latest news and special call call and they directed the parliamentarian to special call the distance none that special call. We can dedicate time on any given
language was specially chosen to be a special call meeting to deal with this situation and thus this situation home. So following the hungry pairings and bias. What I'm seeking is where is the initiating point? I think
so. What I will say that we've already initiated something in terms of wisdom to go and turn athletes are into that issue and how we can make that. So we're constantly there, as well said, but that I think there's a good question that you asked that I have for myself. I think that we can check the answers that the purpose of the meeting isn't to be a final fat to move forward or to to you know, maybe strongly encourage a behavior if it is found to be that I think that that reveals the intent that may help this as well in terms of what's going on so join
me in the initiating point was Mr. Dogs but well, the committee Okay, in case representing Mr. Ross, as listed, because the committee has not stated we speak on behalf of that. And my recommendation was that Mr. Ross consider a friendly substitution is not substitution that kind of
supports that. So there's no advantage you can make a substitute amendment, but no. So they will offer the motion and involvement as a body but to demand from hard to alter something coming out of computing.
That spoke for itself. There was a big thank you
to so you know my work in the legal field and is driving me nuts a being asked as a voting member to look at the conduct or misconduct of somebody without any straightforward accusations without any kind of evidence of anything. It almost sounds to me like we're just going to have a character assassination meeting, and everyone is ready to come and just talk on the chair. I I understand that there needs to be accountability. And I do understand and I'm not saying that the motions are wrong or right. But how can you ask me to bring this to the executive committee? without me even knowing what it's about? Conduct or misconduct is I mean, be careful about the word Joe? Because guess what you get in that position because I know that one day somebody's gonna be there. You're opening yourself up to that too.
So one thing I want to correct. What's being asked is whether or not it should be placed on the agenda to be discussed. Right now. There is no formal accusations. There's no facts to speak about what's being asked right. You'll be they're asked you all can they have a discussion at the next executive board?
But it's still I mean, once again, I mean, it would be left by open ships.
I understand what you're saying. I really do a no way will it become a character assassination. That was to move it to the executive committee so that we would not bog down this meeting with the with the mired in the minutiae of this entire thing, and examining executive committee board level, which holds about a dozen members and so they'll be wide diversity support is not supported that kind of thing, but it will be done with a kinder, gentler approach. And then we will bring the findings back to the general model, and didn't just make recommendations on what the next steps are, what my next processes are.
Thank you for that clarity, and I do appreciate what the committee is trying to do. And I do appreciate the idea of checks and balances. But without any direct accusation without any kind of direct evidence of your vote will be enough for me.
I'm here and turning also add that motion coming out of committee. I believe there were seven of us present. I believe there was a motion and I believe individual or at least one individual second, the motion may not have had the authority as a voting member. to second the motion. So I would argue that motion even coming out of committee may have been flawed reporting requirements. I'm not sure if that's accurate. Or the chairperson. I'm not sure if that's accurate. Did you
hear this?
Madam Chair, you are now facilitating this we call it into the discussion call for whenever you see fit.
No, Mr. Ross, she was asking you Did you hear what was said? So as the second vice president, especially the first question, she said the basic principle second emotion was not appropriate emotion and then the second so that's just the question the way the emotion got.
Of course you do. But that's absolutely correct. Because it could be any one who is a resident of the city of Atlanta and could come and participate in the video peers,
participation versus voting.
That's correct. But you stayed
on with my question is, again, I reserve the right to be incorrect. My question is, is there a distinction is to observe as can come from from all of them. The question is, whether we have observers in the meetings and whether whether those folks are ineligible to vote, voting members of that committee, not necessarily.
Absolutely. We are all about inclusion, not
exclusion. Absolutely. There's no attempt to exclude anybody. I think right now, where we are an impact. We're trying to determine what really are liberals who are the voting members, whether it's a committee or whether it's in
mind, there's no question about that. You know, there's three five members in here who will make the decision. What happened in the video on a path has no consequence unless
it meets all of our stuff committees before the voting that Roger Stone have voting rights and whether others do not notice the question.
Please, stop speaking point of order. Yes, this point is moot. You said that they were appropriate he said it was Madam Chair. Thank you. We have spoke twice to speak on this matter. Your second time on the standard. Thank you. I think that we spend way too much time in discord around these issues. I think it's about time that this could be to get to the work that is designed to do so I would love for us to come to a decision so that all of these volunteers in this room can move about the work of the city of Atlanta and its residents. So I would like to call for a session of discussion.
Thank you.
Call the question. Can I get a second? Thank you for your time. We had to debate on the call question.
Favorite walk off the top of the question, which is the end of discussion? Yes.
And that requires a two thirds vote. Because yes, so.
Okay, everybody in favor of the phone calls the question please raise your hand.
Okay, those not in favor, raise your hands
anyone who abstained Raise your hands. Okay. I think the vote was clear.
The original motion. The motion was to place on the executive board's agenda, a discussion about the conduct of misconduct on the president.
Okay. All in favor. Please raise your hands.
I see three. Okay. Anyone who is not in favor please raise your hands.
We can actually 13 MJ
okay anyone who abstains please raise your hands
Okay, opposition. And sounds to me. Go ahead and read up about the vote
to vote for three in favor. 39 in favor and to say just
and the body has voted. Yes. So this bill should be coming back
as well okay, let's move on. Muscles. This agenda second motion? I do. Yeah, this is this is not recorded. I apologize, everyone. We really did not want to take a die like this. At least. The second motion that came out of committee this morning is to have a letter sent to the empty chair is reminding them of a bad boss request that they send the name of their delegate and alternate to this body that will also be sent to them the coordinator the restore recording secretary and a bad president.
That is motion okay. No. No and this
is motion is to have a letter sent to the 25 AP US requesting their alternate delegates for a PAP and reminding them of the bylaws. What the Bible is what a bad state regarding alternates and delegates. And then that list also will be sent to the coordinator report executor and a bad president. No, it's up to
write your motion. Is there any discussion?
I'm not sure why I have this right. When it almost sounds like there is a complex and was paying tax. And that we need further explanation from planning to say and I respected him with ABS
can't make a mistake. I'm getting St. John. Yeah. He made me speak on this issue and because he has a plethora of knowledge in terms of what the audience thinks what the violence state and so on and I feel a little bit to discuss it in that manner. My family knew it from the surface level of it seeming to be out of contact with or not in contact with planning decision and also with the appointment someone could have somebody to speak to that appreciated for clarity
Yes, to mark and end, the planning department has already reached out to all the chairs, asking them for the names of their delegates this board so I don't see why we need to repeat that. Additionally, since we know that we are in the process of revising our bylaws, reminding everyone what our bylaws currently are seems like a bad idea. Why don't we wait for permissions or any other comments? Yes. The bylaws that everyone may have under Article board members, if you read that what it says a retired
Excuse me. voting members. Okay, I've just got a single voting members. I apologize. Go ahead, Mr.
Nod the motion is up for that.
Discussion when he came to the mic was what I was asking. Okay, does anybody else have any other songs? Alright, so if you would restate the motion that are loaded off down there, it was a pretty good emotion
or more. They sent a letter to the NBA chairs to remind them of the current caveat bylaws, requesting both a delegate and an alternate, and that that information will be passed forward to the league coordinator, recording secretary and a bad precedent.
Does everyone interested in motion? We have a discussion going.
So I want to attempt to to give some clarity in terms of why this has been asked because I think that's when the motion that question has been answered. Again, this is so as a commentary people call on me and have asking questions of matters of opinion about our bylaws, the treaties and making organization. So why is this coming from the chat? I was not present at that meeting. You won't solve it. I came in, but I have some enzymes in the shed to help in terms of why is this being passed
if you are a chair reached out to either compensation plan ambassador who wishes will remember and that may have some new language because in the past we have had Ruto which has always been elections DCP participants and participant on the aspirants the chair, but you haven't asked if you were the chair before, who is a delegate to jobs? That did not happen this during the last exercise. I know that if effect will produce data because my children called me and also I was contacted by other dpus who asked me what is going on here. This was back last year. And our bylaws underneath protocol for membership. We're allowed to have a membership of up to 75 members, but each NPU only having one vote. Therefore there's only been 25 voting members in the past. What we have done is to for example, if I'm not present, the ultra governor who got a chair and as my chair is out here, who is watching he's always watching that he ultimately will be in Paris and will then be able to represent my MPU offering members because of the exercise last year that has that is not in practice today. And there has been a motion about I want to say January it's important to reinstate that process. And also there are the there are people who concern themselves a lot to ask who is the voting member? What our bylaws does address that if you look at the very last sentence in our bylaws from the different vote for the delegates shall have the first baptism then absolutely delivers the ultimate delegate in the last few chair. So the reason why we are being asked to do that is because while we are actively working within the bylaws affected and there is a question that has been given since that shift to the law department about our membership question. What has been asked is that until we've solved for that and we want to start with that as quickly as possible, meaning we bring back some things for this time to hold on to speed to be the solution that will reinstate meaning compatibilism delegates and alternates which some of our members will fall into that chair or as a delegate. Right. And so that is what the task is sorry for the moment explanation, because I'm not a fan of looking down at you well as to the story is because those are the intents of where abortion is coming from. If there's a petition again, so that's why I'm giving that up. I give you my opinion on which way you should vote. I'm giving you the information. In fact, as I have
if I may add one to add to what Mr. Legend was saying. The issue became an issue in chamber last year. When I contacted the clerk's office
for more challenge will be juggling so you're not engaging in debate.
I'm just giving you information. So we have people who are here for the first time this year and they don't know what the history has been and our attempts to get.
In an attempt to get our a gang members sworn in last year, I contact the clerk and when you in order to get out my personal opinion, we have to provide the group with the list of people that have been sworn in impede us and all the verification and I told you we had 75 She said 75 I said yes. So she said okay, what's going to happen is you're gonna have to do a lot of work to get everybody she stopped and she called me I'm gonna call right back. She's completely sick. Send me your Bibles, a copy of your bibles where you have made that change. And she asked me first, when did you all get to 75 members and I told her that we had made the change in our Bibles I think it was the 2019 We'll be right about boss. She said Would you please send me a copy of that and then she began to tell me that you you are supposed to know you're supposed to send us your vows. I didn't know that I have been told so I sent her the Bibles few minutes later, she called me back and she says would you please send me the academy funding orders that authorized a pair to increase his membership from 25 to 75. What we did wasn't orders it was simply barrel barrels. So she said okay. She said what I'm gonna have to check the quarters. And I think probably what they did was they contacted the Office of Planning and in the right and also the binary came back to me was the only way we could about men. Our vitals to increase the membership to 75. Was that the ordinance the Council of democracy born to increase to 70. So, back in March, I had this discussion with the board and reading. We went to the law department for guidance and you can just move read that two or three times over the past few months. Essentially, the guidance that we receive says an amen consists of 25 voting members, each of the 25 in the AMA has one voting member know it will be the chair the chairs designee or the introduced designee since we already had the 50 additional 50 lined up on our roster. I asked about the other 50. The guidance said that a path can have as many members as they want, as we want as long as we have the 25 designated voting members. That's on file in municipal clerk's office. The others again do not wish to the others. And we've discussed this and essentially wanted to keep on top of those because we need you for all of these taskforce appointments that we had. There was no question about keeping the best what we normally have called Double physical as well as in that capacity with planning called the MP use they only asked for the voting members at that time because we had to get that information clerk's office so she could prepare our the documents that we have to sign with this is nothing new. We've been discussing this all year long in terms of how we're going to rectify the error that we made and as they remake us, we sat there with Mr. Hunter when he was making the recommendation and we all thought it was a good thing. Do we need to have all of these people even jail? Yes, we need to have all of these. Okay. So I'm as chair of the president campus organization. There are certain responsibilities that I have to you certain responsibilities that I have to this city. I don't have any authority either way. Okay. Um, okay. So as a result, when we sent the names to the party last night, she spoke about just silence please forget. Ultimately, we still are a 75 member organization. We just have only five official members. And that was really evident in theory because some employees don't have dealt with or dealt with. It's an octopus. But please don't think that we have tried to eliminate the the makeover centers and the recommendation is correct. I've already started my email to tears asking them to please send just for who you're at. I didn't say that the email but I was gonna say there was an argument I need to order this from
us. So we're going to talk about
We've got a motion on the floor. I suppose they might they did have a section. Below
matter, you cannot be the advocate, proponent of an issue and the parliamentarian at the same time. You're sorry
she okay. Again, Eric to wrapping up a couple of the things that you stated before outside of Washington. Since I've been surveying a fan girl a couple of years now, a couple years ago MIP had this process in place a chair, alternate delegate, when I served as the chair on my last bullet first tried to find the roles and at that time this is just a little bit of historical accuracy. That chair was the primary breadwinner. He made a assignment as a fellow who would act in his place and when there was a third which was an all the time until, say machines are made in the free world and by laws. The chair has to wait when the President has been designated and no such time as second time can chapter the firewalls never stated that all 75 people nor any voting member at any given time, there was only 25 What we had was a system in which we were able to make forms for public purposes. And that is why that system has been in place and when I was the chairman of the Bylaws Committee, and we had some problems with that and we're seeing some gracefulness going on savings. Recommendations when we're still under the same guy who was only 25 years old. We can finance the ability to have all people standard in the standard that I still think sometimes in some niche that allow the city to miscarry misconstrue and call it seven because we have never had such a backlog of members and standing on ground rules. Can we clarify that? It still comes down to the same thing. It is what it
is to say to the motion on the floor please
connect.
Secondly, this discussion about your motion
and allow minors I believe it's improper not to see but people that were designated by American as potential voters. Did you ever come up with a smooth? Reluctantly
Yes. Good afternoon again Leto runs Department of City Planning the only thing that I wanted to clarify is that nothing was miscommunicated. There was never any understanding by the Department of City Planning or anyone else at City Hall to my knowledge that didn't have had 75 voting members that was never this is the first time that I've ever heard that ever. It's never been said that 175 voting members that wasn't the case.
We never said the voting members were 75 members we never said anybody said anything about voting members. The question was for the clerk goes, how do we make that change and according to confirm that it needed to have been a change in the ordinance that was being by the City Council. Mr. Martin.
Yes, you're more than happy to do like point out that we are now nine minutes past our scheduled adjournment and seem to be doing bylaws, committee business and the general body rather than the general life business in the gentlelady. So I would like to make a motion that we extend the meeting by five more minutes
it's appropriate because we are this is a point of order. This problem with Mr. ID is department's property at this point that is extended to be the right environment.
We are two minutes past closing time. So we do need to extend the meeting. If we're going to continue with the motion and the discussion.
So
your your motion was to extend meaning by five minutes or seconds. Alright, so probably some motion and second that we extend the meeting by five minutes. All those in favor? Aye. Let's say 10 minutes because he's right. Okay, fine. All right people. Can we extend the minute the motion? A bit the motion to extend by 10 minutes this morning. can be extended can be a major motion to extend my 10 minutes. Okay. All right. He agrees the motion there is to extend a VA for 10 minutes all those in favor please raise your hand.
Foil posing we got
to hurry this essay three or
four. Okay. Anybody have state now? All right. So it's not what you want. 1251 needs to be completed the motion is on the floor. And
Madam Chair, that's one thing to add. And then I'm going to be done with this. On the there's a report that was published from facility from the IRS office, plus the vacancy reports for bass organizations. That was published on January 3 of 2022. And if you look on there, there's always a path that says delegates and there are some instance alternates. Okay.
All right. I apologize, Mr. Ross, for asking me to do this, but please restate your motion so that everybody will understand this device.
The motion is too similar to the 25 Eight to use for requesting that the list of their ultimate delegates and reminding them of the eight that bylaws and the requirements in data. And the data goes into the coordinator a bad precedent and the reporting center.
All right, you've heard the motion and we've had the discussion. All those in favor please ratio.
234888
Okay. Those opposing please raise your hand.
Okay, let's go. All right. Let's do this again. Make sure we got this right. All those in favor, please raise your hand so they
are always opposing please, raise all those bills, please raise your hand
No, that's actually how I was raised. So it's really a
no, no. No I was voting and voting is all right.
In the help for his favor on stage I don't know what I'm thinking. Oh, my gosh, you pin that. You can't just switch. No, no, I
was talking about raise my hand at the wrong time. Do you want us to redo it? Mr. I don't know
what I think technically you should
just do this. For the ones listed. Go for the ones that aren't in favor. One more time. Please. I apologize for this June.
27 in favor, all right. Those opposing please raise your hands one more time.
So get paid in opposition,
eight in opposition and seven.
Very good motion. Phil, thank you very much. We met again. This morning committee to march 18. What we needed again in person dying in the committee room. Thank you very much. That was my report.
We were actually doing committee reports in just about our time do I have any education and intelligence? Never. We do not. Have we ever. Okay good. The culture is gonna give the report
this will be empty but we need to keep it down to one minute. So here is the
title of patient. We've got some goals that we're going to focus on one. Save safety. From the membership in here,
can you have a strategy on planning for the committee and community needs to be
done Dr. Jones MPJ we meet every Saturday every fourth Saturday 2390 domino Parkway, Elin, Ford's a 30318 from Lebanon. So one we did not meet in January due to the mayor's some meetings on the world meet this
summer much. I'm going to ask Mr. Shepherd. Frankie would come up to the mic please.
introduce you to Mr. Kevin Francis, Chair of NP W and to let you know that I have appointed him as the new chair of the AIPAC Public Safety Committee. I was hoping to have a little bit more time so that they can ask you questions but since we're running out of time, I do want to formally introduce you to everybody and I will be sending out to everybody the new so new but the listing of the chairs and committees and their information. And within that email, we're going to ask you to please sign up to participate on the committee's the Public Safety Committee is one of our premier committees and one of our really important for you so if you have an interest in public safety, please contact Mr. Phan. Right. Just want to make sure you have your chance to see.
Thank you. I look forward to working with everybody and please feel free to talk to me after the meeting.
Thanks so much. I thought oh, so this history favorites. How are you? I know you probably don't have a report on where to see his you back and you're doing well. Thank you,
Madam President. I do have a comment using Margaret to get this thank you and resume I do feel a little better. I just wanted to say her conversation. I have a marketing plan that I've structured for us that I'd like to present to the executive committee next month. And then also, I'm working with you to get the list of alternates for the MP so I can go ahead and structure my committee freedom to
recruit and I need to say even one minute before you leave today. Yes sir. Thank you. All right. Public comments. First of all miss the room did you have a record and I'm sorry.
I actually do have a report it the body will require I don't mind saying at all Germans are good. My report so that y'all get the public comment before 1251.
Is that okay with everyone? Going to take public comment for that. Mr. Speaker I got here this morning
before nine o'clock in my one minute. More than 15
years I have been passing a variety of paying people on the city's payroll, Department of Community Affairs just about educating me about affordable housing shofar skills.
AMI is average, median income etc but find a way ahead with the college environment.
See DHS. Chairman.
Long live the Atlanta
Regional housing forum which is quarterly have already helped and most people at least monthly housing
education assuming that we can explain enough votes before the house before we're going to begin with the actual nuts and bolts you can get some meaningful affordable housing in this city. Anybody?
Any suggestions ideas please call me the number
Sure 678-886-8666 Thank you so much. That's me. Yes, ma'am
chair. This is for everybody in the body. So Martha has as of yesterday to spend in the red line from Lindbergh to Medical Center, while not mistaken and what they're doing is facilitating by using Express imbeciles, athletics, so you can just put your papers that use MARTA, if they're trying to connect to the red line. Don't stop at Luber as usual, keep going and stop at Monday's to connect. And also mark is giving $2 vouchers on Uber Lyft. And there's definitely mobility. paratransit services for that combination as well. And this will it started yesterday and it'll go through the 22nd into next week. Thank you very good permissions and poetry the top power people in
it, have wasted time talking about issues that can versus count on midnight in my chair with me and have said things that I don't agree with Leah Nomi because when I met her I was homeless. And I'm a champion for affordable housing, which is a no no in our community in our understanding, but the things that are happening to how people are being treated and how people have read this read it today is just totally disrespectful. This is a waste of our time, and we already had to pay to come down here. We deserve better here in the speed. It's not about people making friends and people free has voted to let everyone vote for it's about the greater good of the people and now we can keep it on and kill because of coffee. We have our children not being educated and we're speaking to transfer fee defend people who we know do wrong. It's time for us to do better or we need to step aside because of nofap happening in the city of Atlanta. And I'm not going to make friends or agree or disagree. But what I read today, the time that was wasted when I when I heard from my own MPU was absolutely disgusting. We just spent their time doing better things and I do believe that it is a conflict of interest when you serve on a board and then you work for the see that if a conflict you cannot serve two masters and we both know it. If you cannot get it right you'd get somebody else to do because some people in this room in this city have been serving for too long and they do not speak for everybody. They only speak for you. Thank
you what's your name please? My name is Josue, their MP, MP you. First I just want to say that this is my very first meeting. So very interesting to me. And so I appreciate that. I do. I am trying to get involved with
this board through my chair so hopefully I will see more of you guys and working to improve the city of Atlanta. It is my birthday today. So I think we can go over your city council chambers to eventually get everybody here and you know work with the city with everything that young lady said as well as everything else. Thank you,
Madam Chair. There's one quick announcement. mouches asked me to serve as the lead on a special event with matters of awards. We haven't done that. A couple of years. If you're interested in serving probably one of my friends. I'll be down in front resolutely to exchange information we can get started. We want to give it up. We want to reach out to us. For you to be selecting this one person you want to honor as the recipient of the neighborhood's bands award and we also want to set aside by me maybe this time we'll pick entities or nonprofits that we want to recognize that we can work throughout the city. So I'm interested to serve you on that special events. Maybe they'll find some exchange information. With you. Thank you.
For the comments or
questions, I'm going to ask for a motion to adjourn motion to adjourn. Wonderful weekend was expected on communications rocks.
I am going to get my word for it. You are free to leave when you would like but
I'm not going to get a sale for that gift when I don't get it.
And I actually do need feedback from voting members. I'm not asking for a vote but I am asking you to kind of get your thoughts to inform our next steps in our work. I wanted to point out first and foremost, confidence is the important step. First, I'm starting to educate members of I'm met with as you know, we have multiple advisory teams that come out of AIPAC to help them do the work that my team and I do. One of those is the Community Impact grant advisory group. The Community Impact grant group met I think about two weeks ago and one of the items on that agenda was removing the Atlanta Planning Advisory Board has an eligible or to receive funding from the community in that grant program. The group that met was in full agreement that may have should not be funded by the community impact grant because it doesn't really aligned with the purpose of the CAG. We then presented the same to the executive committee of the Atlanta Planning Advisory Board who agreed. So I want to get input from the rest of the body, the voting members of the board on whether or not you all are okay with us removing the Atlanta Planning Advisory Board as a potential awardee of the community impact grant.
Secondly,
there have been a number of conversations about relocating this meeting. If you weren't in the I mean, if you weren't in the executive committee meeting may want to pay attention because I don't remember whether we discussed this day or not. And I want you to think of throwing something in there. Pay attention to this part. We have talked a lot about relocating this meeting, finding more appropriate space, accommodations, etc. I've talked to a number of people around here and it does appear that we would be able to meet in the old council chambers,
which,
excuse me, when help accomplish a few things. It has a few benefits that I think are relevant to the board, particularly the ability to string streaming your meetings on YouTube and or Facebook, while giving you a little bit more space to see each other and work together and not begin this the same way. So I've got some money to put on that. And lastly, we are on that last word last word but things that are the input on last week we are working on some rules of engagement and decorum. I think all of you know at this point that I'm glad that this house that that she said in that it is unfortunate that the board has been so many hours in the last year 11 months 12 months on on operational items and not on items that reflect the board's purpose. So I would love to help you all get to a position where you are spending your two and a half hours on substantive matters that affect the city of Atlanta and not dealing with organizational issues. So we're working on some rules of engagement. I spent a lot of time last night drafting getting started drafting that I will finish it up this weekend and pass that along to the 25 members and the voting members of the board for your input. We will handle it the same way we handled the best practices for MP use. I'll create the draft I'll pass it to y'all ask for your feedback. I'll write the feedback that's relevant. I will provide all of that back to you and get some more input and we'll just keep working at it. And so we have a draft that all of you can sign on and feel comfortable with. So I'd love to take any feedback on those three hyphens that y'all have been updated. We have 132 neighborhood organizations that register as you know, as a reminder to don't know, neighborhood organizations are required to register every year that was effective 2021 In order to be included in the MPU directory for neighborhood awards. You have to be registered with the city of Atlanta as a registered organization. We have 132 out of approximately 195 that deadline to apply for the community impact grant is February 28. If you need support please call Tony this week coming. As a reminder, applications cannot be assessed your application closes at midnight. We cannot accept any phone calls asking us to please take this application you must be turned on by women etc. Can't do it. We get the application in on time and please make sure it's complete because incomplete applications will not get a courtesy calls they will be filled in or anything like that has to be completed when we received the application on a week from today. A week from today we will have our strategic planning
board retreat. For the board members we will do the strategic planning team building, Vision setting aligning their purpose conflict resolution etc. Working to create a plan for the for the days ahead and I really really look forward to strengthening the floor so that he position for walk in your purpose and do the work that you're created to do. I'm looking forward to that two weeks out that day is coming. We also need help for the partition advisory group and sorry that I believe is meeting next week. No one has no one here has reached out expressing interest in involved in being involved in that. So I can't say that I sent you an email but those that were already on it in the last conversations are excellent to get that you didn't mention that. So yes, yes, you'll get an email if you're interested, let me know. etc. Please make sure you sign up and we're also warming up for the golden anniversary of the immune system next year, like a class if you're interested in participating in that, starting on April 21. We'll have the first meeting the employees involved in that it's the plan activities for the 50th anniversary of the NPU system. Zoning two point no city wide alternatives continued discussions held on Tuesday February 28 At six o'clock pm at the Buckhead library to 69th Avenue north east. Thank you
for the strategic planning session.
So I can find it that is now down to two places. I
I just need to know it's not me we have very complicated with enormous processes at city. It is even more to begin with anyway next up we're at the rice center as soon as I know. I'll know hopefully by Monday or Tuesday where the strategic planning is really
quick question on the organization's form. Is that actually from sure
is emailed out to all the neighborhood. Last year you won't know exactly what the form is emailed out to all the neighborhood presidents that we have on record this year. Then it gets sent to the chairs and the council members asking them to verify that these are the neighborhood associations active and the way they're asking for personal gain.
And the chance to add the ones that have been left.
I'm sorry, can you repeat that question?
email after the chairs. That's a request to the neighborhood organizations that have been left
off. Yes,
correct. They haven't so if they had not been listed in the directory before the request submitted by laws Babylone officers leave dates and times all of that stuff. But yes, the chair the Indian chairs are asked to confirm the list and add any that are missing take away getting that are not active etcetera. It is the directory is made to the directory of active neighborhood association and
we've been here conversation for the past three years about mega organizations and many of
you, you a most of the folks in here are confusing two different matters. neighborhood associations are not the same as the neighborhoods. We've been talking about neighborhoods not made with an association of American voter files,
etc. That's a neighborhood association.
Associations have got lots we can talk about but I think there's something going on this meter space and we'll see it anything else? Thank you.
