Yeah, so this is I just stepped down as editor about a month or six weeks ago, to start to build this project. It's really been something we've been working on for quite a while. So it's within Cal matters. But you know, from you know, the work I've been doing from the LA Times and the think tanks and at Cal Matters has really been working a lot around state policy and state government and state politics. And one of the things you recognize right away is how especially invisible the process are and the is in the policymaking process in Sacramento and the legislators themselves. So you know, I mean, one of the problems that I really thought we needed to work on as journalists was really to kind of bring more transparency to that policymaking process and make you know, those individual legislators more approachable or understandable or accessible to their constituents. And so, so that was the problem that we tried to or there we're addressing with digital democracy. You know, the Digital Democracy came about you know, it's basically pulling in a whole bunch of data from throughout state government. You know, we have campaign money, we have transcripts from every hearing and every floor session. We have money, data on votes and legislators and political registration and election results from the districts. And all of that goes into a database and then the AI rolls over that to identify stories, tips for reporters. So I mean, the idea here and the hope is that they're, you know, that a relatively a handful of reporters can really meaningfully cover 120 legislators in California. And, you know, I have kind of three goals coming out of this one is you know, that that you can change behavior by creating this transparency I mean, you know, legislators just vast generalization but you know, when you're when, when things are pretty much invisible. There's really no reward for you know, casting this vote for the public interest. When it you know, is a politically risky vote, you know, what, because of special interests, and there's really no penalty for, you know, siding with a special interests on a vote that you know, is going to raise issues for public interest. So, you know, I do think that when there, there's this kind of transparency, legislators are notoriously thin skin, they will know this is out there. Just that it exists, I think will change behavior. There's certain lists like you know, we get we'll collect all the data and all the gifts that they get, you know, and print the top 10 lists, who took the most gifts and you know, it's not a list you want to be on two years in a row. So one goal is changing the behavior of the legislature. Another is that since there's you know, this, this process is so invisible, you know, if for those who want to engage with the state, you know, legislators are with an issue that they care about, you know, it's really hard to find that portal or that information, especially, you know, something that's trusted or, you know, not from the Legislative themselves or their opponents or or some bias source that there's a nonpartisan, trusted source of information to access to understand who these people are and what they're doing. And so, you know, I think the second goal is really to encourage more civic and civic engagement. And then the third is really to help journalism mean you know, like, I say, the, a lot of the like, or across the country, a lot of the State House coverage has been diminished quite a bit in California, you know, the fifth largest economy in the world. The the press corps is pretty is a, you know, a fraction of what it was before. And so you know, if technology can do a lot of the reporting that we used to have when there was a giant or really robust press corps covering state government, then you know, I think it can really we can do a lot more journalism with fewer reporters and using technology to do a lot of the reporting so so those are the three ambitious goals