Yes, yeah. So to and thank you, Calvin, for getting us on track here. For those of you who did not listen to our previous episode, first, I highly recommend going and checking that one out that is going to help a lot with understanding what exactly we're talking about in this episode. So as I said before, we are looking through Scott Adams book when Bigley persuasion in a world where facts don't matter, which is taking on the rhetoric of Donald Trump, why Donald Trump is in Scott Adams words, a master persuader. And it's very important to Scott, that we understand exactly what Donald Trump has done for political discourse in this country, which he seems to be kind of laudatory of, he thinks that Trump is good at what he does, and has spoken in laudatory terms about at least his persuasion skills. Now, in our first chapter, we talked about Scott's sort of framing of himself as a self styled hypnotist as well as a master predictor. That is kind of the and that's going to be a theme that keeps coming up here, Scott Adams fancies himself very, very good at predicting things being able to see how the future will come about. Through his understanding of persuasion, it was his sort of primary claim that Trump was going to win the 2016 general election for president because of his persuasion stack, as he calls it, because of his just unbelievable skill with being a master persuader. And what he calls punching a hole in the fabric of reality. So in our last episode, we had everything from, you know, his consistent, just absolutely interminable bragging about his prediction skills, to his taxonomy of Persuaders into three different classes, commercial grade, which he considers himself cognitive scientists, which I guess would be people like us who have PhDs or advanced degrees in this field of study. And then master persuaders.