So we're behind, we're also out of bounds. Again, if you zoom in on a critical mid band [inaudible], and this is really important spectrum, because it's got those technical characteristics that make it really good for 5G service, it can cover a large area, you get that propagation, it has a lot of capacity. So you get this so it's important to control. What you see in that range is that the federal government is the biggest season. And after that, unlicensed and shared spectrum, eclipses license spectrum, by about fourfold. Even if you go higher in the spectrum chart and millimeter wave, the [inaudible], what this means is that the United States right now is leading the world when it comes to licensed and unlicensed spectrum. But we're trailing the world when it comes to [inaudible] spectrum availability. So why does this matter? It matters because for the first time, we are facing a credible and well resourced threat to our wireless leadership. And let me take a quick aside here and, you know, talk about some of the discussions that we were having in the US government, when we talked about spectrum policy, what we saw was, or at least what I saw was, this view that in the United States, our national power will come from our military holding on to spectrum assets. When you looked at other countries, she looked at governments that [inaudible] government, they were taking a different view, their view was that national power would come from the success of their commercial technologies and their ability to proliferate them around the world. He had these two kinds of different paths. But what it meant was that they will mobilize. And so far the United States has yet to make any spectrum available for 5G that comes close, in scale or scope, to that of the Chinese government. That's a metric I think that we need to keep an eye on.