Yeah, so flexible farming is what I used to describe this really radical transformation of agriculture, and we see, you know, you mentioned the George Naylor quote. We've seen increasingly commodified farm life really increasing since the 1980s where there's more dependence on rented land, there's more dependence on farm workers, that kind of thing. But one of the cases, there still are a lot of connections. So, for example, Kathleen sex Smith has a lot of research on dairy farmers in New York bringing their workers partially into the family and saying, Well, workers are finished our work at 5pm but family members can work until the work is done, or to say you're part of the family, we expect you to come to the birthday party or that kind of thing. You need to be the social engagement. So it's not necessarily to the benefit of the workers, but they are often seen as part of the family. They're part of the productive unit. In Brazil, we see this radical alienation of land, labor and crops. So for example, one farm is not tied to a piece of land if they get a better offer for another piece of land in another state, even they might pick things up, sell the land in that original state and move to the other piece of land. So it's based on economic potential, basically the piece of land crops. You know, if you plant a coffee tree or coco tree, you're tied to producing that crop for foreseeable future. If you plant something like soybeans or cotton, soybeans is an annual crop. Cotton is perennial, but they plant, they grow it as an annual crop. Potential. Essentially, you can respond quickly to the market. You can respond quickly to the climate. So you can pull these things out and replace the crops with something else. There's no attachment from the farmer to that crop. In my work in Bolivia, the farmers were identified as chemo farmers. They identified with the production they were doing, and they took a lot of pride in growing that particular crop. You see the same thing in Iowa with corn farmers, or in Craig gathering 10s work in in Paraguay, you see it with soy farmers there. But here, nobody identifies as a corn farmer or swipe a farmer. They are just a farmer, and they'll produce what sells, essentially, and then with labor, these farmers are essentially working in the office. They're doing investor reports, they're dealing with government regulations. They're hiring and firing workers. The actual labor force isn't family, but it's, you know, workers from the surrounding community, and they're very easily, they're expected not to stay with the farm more than one to three seasons. So there's a real high turnover of those farm workers, and there's no real connection there. So all these things together. Mean the farmer can respond quickly to market changes. They can. You know, when cotton was down a couple years during my research, they would shut down their cotton gym, which meant 6060, jobs were cut, essentially, so they could respond quickly. But there's, of course, limits to this model. So even though the land is flexible, you still have to deal with the particularities of that soil. So in the sahado of Brazil, you have to add a lot of organic matter. You have a lot of a lot of nitrogen. You have to deal with acidic soils, plant cover crops, all those kind of things that they didn't have to do in their farms in Iowa or Illinois, where black soils really fertile soils. So they had to deal with that with workers, they had to deal with really strong government regulations to protect workers in Brazil. And with crops, you still have to deal with pests that come up, especially if you're playing the same thing year after year in the same field. So there's ways that they're still limited in their flexibility, but their the intention is to be free of connection, free of being coupled to to production methods. And you're seeing this, I think, you know, at the end of my research, I saw, or while I was writing this book, I saw a post from a land agency in Illinois, and they were saying, you know, they're moving their land sales, their auctions online during COVID. And they said a huge benefit was, of this was that farmers couldn't see who was outbidding them. They couldn't see who was taking that piece of land. So they're talking about the benefits of being virtual is that people couldn't be so connected to the land. Nobody knew who was buying that piece of land. I think also we're going to see with climate change intensifying, it's going to be the farmers who have capital and the mindset of moving who can buy land where it's now productive to plant corn and soybeans, whereas farmers who don't have that capital are not going to have that option, or people who have the capital but prefer to be on their piece of land that they've been on for generations. Wow,