It's such a great point, John, and you know, I think that's a dynamic we see throughout society is where, let's go back to the one you just mentioned there with, you know, the parents have the authority, God given authority to disciple and to bring up their children and even churches need to understand that and respect that they can support parents in that role and they can equip them they ought to this is the, you know, this is their role, they should equip them to do that. But very often what you see is you see parents, they don't you know, because authority comes with responsibility. Our fallen nature, in some ways wants to kind of abrogate it like, I don't want it, you know. And so I'm going to push it off to the church, you take it you, you know, you disciple my kids. Now, what's the proper response of a church? In that case? It should say, No, this is your responsibility. Oh, I'll help you. I'll equip you to to carry it out. But what happens wrongly is the churches go, Oh, you don't want to do that? I'll do that. You know. And so all in all, encroach on your authority, you see that like, in our in the government right now, where I think of the House of Representatives, for example, and the Senate, they've lost so much authority visa vie, the executive branch of the government, because they haven't wanted that authority. They've, you know, they they don't want to be held accountable. So they've abrogated it to the executive branch and the executive branch has grown into this massive behemoth, because they're, like, very happy to step out and say, I'll take that on, you know, so yeah, it's, it's, those are examples of it not working correctly, but it points to how it should work. You know, it's an understanding that there are God defined roles of authority. And they both need to be they need to be understood, they need to be embraced, we need to encourage one another, like the church should encourage the parents know, you fulfill your responsibility of authority, I'm not going to take that on from you, but I'll help you to do it. My wife, Kim did this. When we got married, I didn't, I had a real mixed up crazy view of authority was very culturally shaped was very negative, you know, I was I'd consider myself a feminist. And so I certainly didn't want to be in a position of authority. I didn't want to be the patriarchy, it's all evil. Right? I had all these ideas, right. So I was like we're equal. But what that meant is, I'm going to let you make the decisions. So and then she was the one who kind of said, like, she could have said, Oh, great, I'll do that I'll kind of, you know, I'll take advantage of your weakness and your unwillingness to exercise authority and kind of all grab the reins of power here. But to her credit, she said, I'm going to actually stay in my lane loop to use your analogy. And I'm going to help you to exercise the authority that God's given you. So she kind of used her position of submission to help me learn how to be an authority. I really credit Kim with, with, with helping me learn what it meant to be have authority in the home because without her, and you can see the same dynamic and workplaces too. You know, sometimes you have a boss who's very insecure. And they don't feel like they should be in authority. And sometimes, rightly so. Like, even here at the DNI, I've got people working for me that are more, Dwight, I'm looking at you. I mean, John, you two that are more experienced, qualified, wise, whatever it is, like, you know, so. But to you guys is credit you come and say no, Scott, you're you've got position here. And so how can we help you to exercise that position here? So it's really beautiful, that I know we're getting we're running late. I just feel like there's, as I'm thinking about authority, there's still one, there's many things we could say. But I do think there's another important thing to put on the table. And that is, authority is legitimate. In the Bible, let's say in, in, in the biblical worldview, it's legitimate to the degree that the orders, the laws, whatever is issued by the authority is in alignment with God's law, that that, that God's law, and you can think of the 10 commandments or whatever you want to think of there. It trumps I mean, that's, that's the ultimate authority. That's the ultimate law. And human authority is legitimate, only to the degree that it isn't alignment to God's law. I just think that's another thing that's really important to say, because in a fallen world, there isn't God, there isn't God's law. You know, the, you know, I'm a law unto myself, that's this kind of autonomous idea, or, you know, if you're the dictator, you know, I make the laws, I make the rules around here, you know, and if I say, you know, something, it goes, No, it has to be in alignment with God's law. And you so many examples of this, I think of, you know, Martin Luther King, Jr, who went to jail over this because he was under a regime in Jim Crow in the south where there was all sorts of unjust laws that discriminated against black people. But they were it was codified as law. And, you know, he he felt like it was illegitimate because in God's word, in God's law, people are Aren't you no superior, inferior based on skin color? Right? So I'm going to violate those laws, you know. And then he went on from his letter from Birmingham jail to say, if if a man made laws out of alignment with God's law, it's it's not a legitimate law. You know, it's not a law at all. And it sets up a ground for disobedience for civil disobedience. I think the Bible has grounds for civil disobedience. And that's true at every realm. So if I'm issuing a command to my wife in the home, that's out of alignment to God's law, it's immoral. It's calling on her to do something that violates her conscience or is a moral, she's under no obligation to, to obey that command, because she's under this higher law. She and she's answerable to a higher law. And, and in fact, in some cases, it's it's required that we disobey you know, in Nazi Germany, they had laws that forbade you from helping Jews that were being rounded up and sent to concentration camps. That was a law that was issued by civil authorities. You had an obligation, a positive obligation to violate that law, you know, to help the Jew, Thou shalt not murder. Right, that I mean, so you had a conflict between God's law, Thou shalt not murder in the regime, which was murdering innocent people. Thoughts on that one, guys? I just think that's again, another really important piece to put on the table there. So