Well, indeed, we believe it is. I mean, they have no right to say what they did with their nine March 2021 position statement. They get their guiding influence from what used to be the old co ag ministers of health council. Now, that leads me on to the probably more important aspect there. Like we can't get APRA directly well, who can influence APRA? The body that influences APRA is the Australian Health Protection principle committee, the ah PPC. Now that's the star chamber, but everything that we've seen go down over 2020 and 2021. People aren't aware that the federal government was responsible for the state and territory based mandates, social distancing rules, masking rules, contact tracing, quarantining isolation rules, because it was run by the ah PPC for perspective. So, you know, we have the who has what's called the International Health Regulations created in 2005, the federal government became a treaty signatory and member to those ihr to the ihr rules in 2007. Now, whenever the who declares a public Emergency of International Concern, which is what they did, what was that in February or March last year with respect to the source code to that enlivens articles 15 through 18 of the International Health Regulations, when those articles are enlivened the who then start sending out recommendations to member countries. Those recommendations, though not obligatory, nonetheless, are meant to be very, very strong guidance towards member states of which Australia is so after that public health emergency was declared by the WHO. All the action stations were alerted within the Federal Department of Health to activate the Australian Health Protection principle committee to start dealing with the recommendations From the who. Now? Let's take a look at it. Back in 2019, we Australian federal health department, together with the states and territories, finalize the second edition of the Australian Health Management Plan for pandemic influenza get the word that pandemic August 2019. Go and look at attachment h, which is the evidence Compendium, the evidence Compendium. And the reason why they produce the second version after the original version of 2014 is that they employ teams of scientists to go and investigate the following issues, travel restrictions, quarantine funnel scans, school closures, work closures, work from home, mass gatherings, contract chasing early antiviral treatments, masks, PPE, gear, all of those particular issues, had extensive teams look at all the evidence. And in just about I think it was 90% of those instances, seeking to employ any of those measures came back from those expert panels as having minor effectiveness, that is to say, an effectiveness of somewhere between zero and 10% of producing any favorable outcome. In other words, the advice came back is that you do not do these things do not do these things. The best advice and deed was to teach people not to cough in other people's faces and to wash their hands regularly. Now, when we look back into the response by our federal government, they did I'll just go through it.