So yeah. So there's basically like kind of two parts of the paper, the first one where I talk mostly about sex and romantic partners and sexual romantic relationships. And the second part where I kind of switch the focus to be about healthcare institutions and providers. And I really liked that that second part, I mean, it's, it's something that I've been working on more recently, I gave, I gave a talk at the Center for Clinical ethics, and unity health Toronto recently to healthcare providers to kind of see what kinds of things that I can actually impart to them about this, this issue that they're going to be facing with our patients. So really, I think that the history of medicalization of homosexuality really weighs on these relationships. Because whether or not a healthcare provider is going to prescribe PrEP is gonna depend on how much they know about, about the history of HIV, but also the kinds of sexual practices their patients are engaged in and the kinds of relationships that they are building. And those kinds of conversations between healthcare providers, and especially say MSM or gay, bisexual, queer men, in an institution or in a clinical setting can be really difficult because, you know, we have to share really intimate details about our about our personal lives with our doctors, or with nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists. And so they might, if they don't know enough about our lives, they're not going to know which questions to ask to know, if prep is going to be a right for us. Or, you know, they might actually not even know about PrEP itself, and then it's going to the roles are going to be flipped, and we're going to have to be the ones asking for it or, or trying to educate the healthcare providers about it. And this all, of course, is going to depend on where you're at, you know, if you're in an urban center, you might have healthcare providers, especially in sexual health clinics that really know about this. And if you're in a rural setting, and you're talking to your family doctor, that might not always be the case. And so the trust in those relationships between individuals, you know, MSM who are going to be patients in the setting, and their health care provider, is really key to kind of getting that information out there. But it's also going to involve trusting institutions more broadly, because you know, we're walking in to a doctor's office or into a clinic. And if we don't feel like we're going to be able to feel comfortable in that space, sharing this kind of information about ourselves, or even going to these spaces in the first place, then we might miss out on access to prep, not to mention other other issues of access around cost. And, you know, coverage. And so, so yeah, so I kind of tried to pull apart some of the ways that, you know, the history of institutions, educational institutions, affects these relationships, and, and whether or not, you know, we can actually trust institutions in the same way that we can trust, say, healthcare providers, I find that to be a really interesting, a part of the paper and just just a aspect of the philosophy of trust more broadly, you know, whether or not, you know, the, we can trust governments, you know, institutions, corporations, you know, typically we think of trust as an interpersonal concept, we trust another individual, another person, or agent, and whether or not these institutions, whether or not trust applies, in this case, is something that's really interesting, but I think it helps us practically speaking, you know, make make these environments a little bit more conducive to, to actually, you know, linking MSM with, with prep as it should or prevention, if that's going to be something that's going to be helpful for them and for many it is.