I think um in this one, I get a bunch of likes. So let me warn, you know, I think we have created categories to avoid the human. Okay, you know, if we if we would start with a basic category that everyone that we serve is a human being, we all have that in common, right? And so, over the past two years, I've seen us just build categorizations, of need. And so I give you an example, I had a conversation the other day, and the person said to me, well, are they really poor? Are they extremely poor? Or are they low to moderate poor? Are they you know, and I was sitting there going, do you really think the person who can't feed their kids is sitting here going, you know, I'm not extremely, extremely low, poor level, but on the industry and on the societal and it is comparing levels of pain to figure out which one is more in pain for us to solve, but to the person that's in pain, it matters, right? If you look at the trauma debate, where people are like, well, I don't think what you just described is trauma it's still trauma to that person. Right? It is still, it is still important to that person, they still, it is still important to that community. And so we sit back and we build eligibility criteria as as an industry. And so one of the eligibility criteria is that I find, you know, we challenge here a lot is, well, if the kid if the young person is living with a caregiver, and is not failing in school, it's very hard to find that child services. Right? And you're like, okay, well, I know some individuals who are having consistent nightmares, and is in the morning thinking of cutting themselves, but they have a 3.8 GPA. And they live with their mother. Right? So it happens to all of us. And so at the end of the day, we really have to sit back and think about, you know, the categorization and eligibility criteria that we drown, you know, people in need with, because I've met parents who are in dire needs and they're calling and all of the phone numbers and you're like, well, your kid is not as extreme yet. Do they have a charge? They've been in trouble with the law yet. And mom's like, that's what I'm trying to prevent. And the young person doesn't qualify. The other thing that we've really combated over the past two years is what I what I call macro harm. That turns into micro hate, and in communities and in homes, right. And so one of the hard populations for us to serve right now is the immigrant, the immigrant population. Because if you really think about it, from a macro perspective, just turn your television on this afternoon, right? From a macro perspective, if you're an immigrant watching the news today, would you accept any services into your household? Would you trust anyone to walk in to say, I'm going to help you? So there's another lens as a social worker, we have to think about, if you're an immigrant in a domestic violence situation, who do you call, who's going to come save you? Who's going to help? Because everything from a macro perspective that I'm hearing, while sitting here, in a domestic violence situation, is telling me, I don't like you. And so from a macro perspective, we have to think about what is happening at a macro level, and how many populations of need is being disenfranchised, just by rhetoric. And those people are going on to grow. And those people are becoming harder to reach. And then it rises to the top. And then you see a great percentage of individuals walk in the streets like we did, when we were sitting at a hotel, we see a great percentage of people homeless, we demonize teachers, we've spent an elegant two years, teachers went from being essential to now replaceable, if you follow the macro, the macro language around it, right. And so now, the teachers who are one of the lowest paid occupations in our country, are walking away from that industry. And so we have to be very cautious around demonizing educators, our social workers, and even law enforcement, because when we're literally the bandaids for the wounds of society. And so at the end of the day, if if you demonize the bad days, there's a lot of young people looking at careers that they thought were admirable, at one point, watching the macro hate going, I don't want that I don't want to be involved in that. And they're walking away from the profession. Even the ones in the profession are walking away from the profession. The third thing is there's been an uptick in need from the client. So I equate it to a basic example. I was talking to a friend who's a firefighter, and we were just talking about our different industries. And he was like, well, what you just described to me is, you know, we average one fire maybe a week, right? One or two fires a week, when I signed up it was one or two sounds like you have people signed up averaging maybe one or two fires a week. And as 20 fires a week, because people just went through a macro level of trauma. All of us did. So we just live through a life threatening situation with COVID. And we're all responding to it. And so the treatment specialist, so that is our therapists, our case managers and industry of social work. And so now an industry that was probably used to two fires a week and seeing 20 fires a week. The case managers coming in have a caseload of 15 kids, and our use of maybe three or four exploding per week, and as 12, the therapist is used to, you know, five deep level therapeutic situations a week. Now it's 10. And so that is kind of what we've seen over the past two years. And if we're not careful, we will lose some very high performing people in our industry, if we don't take a closer look at the industry and the need, the societal need that drives industry.