Okay, so I wrote up a brief blurb, I guess I didn't read it out loud for the meeting. Actually, it's too long. I don't really want to read all of it. It's in the fucking minutes. But on the February general meeting, we did vote to quote, say that the discourse forum is, quote, the place of record for any votes or any documentation and quote, also that we quote, adopt a culture that anything that members believe can be beneficial by being viewed by other memberships should be posted on the forum. So like, Robbie's talked about how it is kind of our place of like, record, it's not just like, a random, like chat group. Like I don't think any of us would care if we deleted like someone went back and deleted all their posts on the WhatsApp group or something. And I think going forward, my point was, it's like we're very young org, but like maintaining historical continuity is important. In the future, other members are also going to leave like factions may farm and dissolve and leave. And just allowing, like all future members to always anonymize and remove the records or Foreman's records upon departure would just disrupt our record keeping. And like too many removals would obscure, like voting patterns, how other factions voted, and would just lead us with like a, or leave us with an incomplete and potentially misleading history to like, and we wouldn't really be able to understand like, what went wrong, right, like how the order was shaped. And it would just leave the people who are left to really get to shape the origins narrative, because no other narrative like other narratives would not exist. And, like, I just feel like we should clarify that it's not just the forum, like your voting history, your communication records, the stuff you've produced on stuff like Google Docs, they're all key to the work that the membership does. And when you complete tasks, like working on SFP, or doing research, that is advancing like everyone's collective goals, and then removing those could erase valuable work that others may rely on. And some of this could be replaceable, such as minutes about meetings that like everyone else has forgotten about at this point. Four just took a lot of time to do that work. And it's unfair to ask current members to redo the work now, like we're in different contexts, and mindsets. And we should probably just say that joining the VC comes with the understanding that all votes and contributions are recorded. For transparency, they come in part of our club's history, and that there shouldn't be an expectation that you can erase all your records, and contributions upon leaving. And that that's just for sharing accountability, preserving the integrity of our records. And just fostering like a transparent and honest organizational culture that like, you know, like, whatever you post on the forum is gonna be up there, or like, whatever we produce is gonna be up there like Ravi, like I was saying, like, sure you can delete a post, make sure we're not we're not saying like, you never delete anything. But like, we do have a code of conduct that we passed long, long ago that I don't think anyone's ever read. Part of that is what was it? Yeah, yeah. Like knowingly engaging in behaviors that are harmful or disruptive to organizational work. Like doing that, I think, of course, is up to interpretation of like, the membership, I guess. So like, you know, going back and just like manually deleting everything, I think would be disruptive. So we'd probably have to, like, stop you from doing disruptive behavior. But like, so there's no like black and white line between like, what is disruptive and what isn't? Like, you know, 10% of those 5%. Oppose, it's just going to have to be a case by case thing, but I don't know. I don't know if he should make the bylaw. Or I don't even know, like what I'm what I said,