Right, so two things on that, first, I think we have a pretty good diversity of professional experiences currently represented on the court, public defender, prosecutors, people worked in the different branches of the government, people have had backgrounds as trial judges, as appellate judges. So I think it's never perfect. You never can cover everything in terms of professional experiences. But I think we have a pretty good range of experiences represented among the nine of us right now. And and, and geographically diverse as well, in terms of where this wasn't the case even a few years ago. But in terms of where people come from, and Justice Jackson from Miami, Justice Barrett, Louisiana, the chief from Indiana justice courses, Colorado, I don't help the cause on that, but I'm from DC. But anyway. But that's good, too. Because I think a lot of where you grew up through AJT, and informs a lot of kind of who you are, and your understanding of different parts of the country, which I think is important, again, when we're thinking about 330 million Americans. So then, for me, my White House experience for five and a half years is really quite central to my thinking about a lot of topics. And I worked for two and a half years in the Counsel's Office and three years of staff secretary. For those who don't know what that position is, you're the clearinghouse for the paper that goes to the President, the draft speeches, the policy memos, and you farm them out to make sure the President's getting a good product that represents consensus views. And if there's disagreement that those disagreements are flagged, so no one can kind of get their own paper into the president, without going through you. It's very important role to make sure that it's kind of refereeing. And it was good preparation for being a judge to referee disputes among policy advisors to the president, including Secretary of Defense CIA, in some, some heavy hitters, to put it mildly. And that was, that was an important job. But But, and one, I've learned so much from President Bush personally, but also traveling the world with him. And you know, whether in Afghanistan or Russia, or China, or Buckingham Palace, or the Vatican, and to see the world and to see the country with him and to see the demands that are placed on the president. So I think being a judge justice on our court is a difficult position. But and I think being a member of Congress is a difficult position. I think those things pale in comparison to the difficulty of being president no matter who's president. And I saw that firsthand for three years with President Bush, the enormous responsibility that you have it starts every morning with the national security briefing and ends every night with thinking about least at that time, but still potential terrorist attacks on the country and knowing that if something bad happens, it's going to be all on one person's shoulders. And he came into the Oval Office on September 12 2001. And essentially said this will not happen again. And everything he did for the next seven years, seven half years, in my judgment was motivated, well motivated by this will not happen again, including some controversial decisions for which he took a lot of criticism, but I think it was all motivated by he understand the central importance of the presidency and his role in doing that, and I think I learned a lot about the presidency, which informs I think, my understanding of national security policy Congress has an important role. I'm not saying that. But the President's role in what the nature of the presidency and the decisions the President has to make. I all So saw separately how the agency process works. And so this may inform a little bit of my understanding of administrative law. But when you run for president, you're in the snow in Iowa or New Hampshire, you're not going out there and saying, I'm running for president, so I can get in there and follow that statute. Exactly. Yeah. You're like, I'm gonna go reform, immigration law and health care, law, environmental policy. And I'm going to, I'm going to go in there and do XY and Z on that. And then you get into office. And it's hard to get things through Congress. And then there's a lot of pressure put on the agencies to try to do as much as they can to achieve the President's goals. This is a completely bipartisan phenomenon that I'm describing. And you tried to do what you can within the existing statutory authority, and it's a lot of pressure on the agencies to push the envelope? Well, that's where I think the courts come in and saying, wait a second, as a matter of separation of powers that's beyond the existing authority you have, you have to go back to Congress to get additional authority for that. But I think what I saw in that process, convinced me that it's important that the courts police that because the executive branch, all the incentives in the executive branch, are to push beyond existing authority, do what they can to solve the environmental problem or to help better securities regulation or better labor regulation or immigration, as we've seen over and over, where presidents have trouble getting legislation passed and want to push forward on legislation. So both an understanding the presidency, the demands out of the national security demands, and then understanding the agency process. I learned so much. In those five and a half years, I think, you listen to oral arguments, even recent oral arguments, you can tell that I'm that that's not far from my mind. And then I'll add one last thing, just going around with President Bush for three years, I got to know them extremely well, personally. And like Justice Kennedy, just President Bush is a tremendous role model for me, and how he conducted himself how he treated other people. Even when he was criticized, he was always optimistic I keep painting above my desk, and my former clerks got gave to me when I was confirmed to this court. That's a painting that's a replica of a painting President Bush had in the Oval Office all eight years, it's called Sunrise side of the mountain. And it has the quote, underneath it live on the east side of the mountains, the time that is the side to see the day that is coming, not the day that it's gone. And President Bush is always talking about living on the sunrise side of the mountain and staying optimistic. Despite all the criticism that comes on the presidency, despite all the demands, he was always generous to other people, always great to his staff. And I try to live up to that. And you know, we get a lot of criticism, we get a lot of heat as judges, and I constantly think about being optimistic, more optimistic about the court. I'm optimistic about the country. I'm optimistic. Well, my colleagues, I, I remember those lessons from President Bush, I think those are really helpful to me on a daily basis to kind of think through, okay, don't worry about today's criticism, because just stay optimistic about the future. So I credit him for helping reinforce that in May.