Certainly, we're definitely at a place where we want to think about what is in our code, and then the next iteration of our code, how language in it needs to be changed or altered or standards just need to be flat out removed, would be my opinion. So currently, in our in our ACA code, there is a standard in the section about confidentiality, about contagious and life threatening diseases. And what the standard says is that a counselor may be justified in breaching confidentiality and a case where their client has a contagious a life threatening disease. And there's a third party who is as at risk. And so it's, there's so many pieces of that that are that are really important to think about. So, you know, one piece is that this may be justified language, right? That also means it's like you may not be justified. And it's important to note that, in the ethics in our ethical code, there is no mandate for us as counselors to breach confidentiality. In cases where someone has HIV or any other contagious or life threatening disease, we don't have a mandate. And some people may read that as a mandate or saying, Oh, this is something that I can do. But I caution people to think about what the implications of that can be knowing that, you know, HIV is a highly stigmatized illness. And knowing that, what a counselor, sort of the knowledge that a counselor may have about this illness is likely limited. It could be incorrect. It could be David information, are they making a sound ethical decision if they decide to breach confidentiality, and I, you know, I wrote a paper about this back in publishing back in 2018, in the Journal of counseling and development, and one of the points that I make in that paper is that like the language in the code says, it talks about diseases that are commonly known to be contagious and life threatening. So if we start basing our ethical decisions on what is commonly known, that can that's a very slippery, slippery slope. And HIV is an example of that, right? Because what is commonly known about HIV is incorrect. There are people who still think that like mosquitoes can transmit HIV. There are people who think that using a utensil after someone with HIV can The transmitted people who think that you can contract HIV from toilet seats, right? This is this is some of the common knowledge about HIV, which is, these are myths. These are misconceptions, these are not true. So it's it's really not prudent for us to make ethical decisions based on common knowledge, right, we need to use accurate scientific knowledge, right, in the decisions that we're going to make. And there are a number of some scientific pieces that a counselor really needs to think about in this instance, right? You may be dealing with a client who is living with HIV, however, they're adherent to their medication, and they have an undetectable viral load. And scientific study after scientific study has shown us that if someone has an undetectable viral load, which means that they're the amount of virus in their body is so small that it cannot be detected with our tests, that they're not going to transmit HIV to another person, even if there aren't any prevention methods used, right? This is called u equals u undetectable, equals untranslatable. And this is really important information to know if your client is under undetectable, because not a concern about them transmitting HIV to another person, we also have to think about like prevention methods, right? We all know, condoms are important for helping prevent HIV and other STDs as well. But for HIV, there's actually a medical prevention method known as prep pre exposure prophylaxis, which is a medication that someone who's not living with HIV can take. And it prevents the transmission of HIV. So prevent protects them from like contracting the virus. That's important to know as well. Because if someone who if you have a client who's undetectable, their partner, the person that they're, you know, engaging in sexual relationship with is on PrEP, there is no concern about transmission, right in those instances. And so that's the information that's not commonly known, but it's scientifically know. Right? So that's scientific knowledge. So counselors, like we can't be going on what's commonly known, we have to really make decisions that are fat, factual, that are prudent so that we don't cause harm. Because remember, like that's an ethical, do no harm. Yes, right. Do no harm. And if we think about our ethical code, there are a number of aspects of that code that are really relevant to clients who are living with HIV, right? So we No, of course, do no harm. We also know that like, our our primary responsibility is to the client and promoting their dignity, right, honoring their diversity, right, all of those things are primary. So that really comes first. In addition to that, we know that there are like cultural issues that are connected to HIV, when we look at like health disparities, that the populations who are mostly affected by HIV, we know that there are social justice issues surrounding HIV, like HIV criminalization, laws that disproportionately affect, you know, black communities. So there's all these other pieces to this that connect to like our ethical obligations to our client that we really need to consider. And unfortunately, I think the, the tendency is to jump to the confidentiality piece. Oh, do I need to? Do I need to tell, do I need to tell this third party? Do I need to breach? Well, hold up, hold your horses? Calm down for that? There are several other things that really need to be considered. Before we even think about breaking confidentiality to report to, you know, a third party.