I'm going to hear from Korea about it because I think she was imagining
she was reading even more than the resolution itself. This is more than what the resolution? Actually we are because he's got all the facts
or has added the manufacturing. So
I think she probably was taking it a while ago, two or three effects,
yet she wanted some tiny boy again, I mean, what are the what facts do you leave out? Actually in order to make it?
Well, I guess while we're waiting to see if anybody else shows up, and we really don't have enough to actually have a forum to sit around the agenda, I just had a couple of questions that we might need to just discuss
the applicants for the A CRP, that process takes a while. And, you know, the group living standards and community we have to have elections, we don't have long lists. And we have a number of applicants for slots. So we're going to need to divide them up into some in September or November and some in our December, because it takes a while with each applicant coming up to the market doing their a brief introduction, and then questions that the body has to ask.
My suggestion would be that because we're going to have separate ballots for each office, if we could have one ballot go out and while those ballots are being counted, one ecrb nominee could stand up and do spiel and then we announce the results of that have next ballot and so that each time a bell is being counted for our officers and a CRP applicant is speaking to that was showing assistant
to today that nominees from one
so if we would only have two applicants right now for acrp the rest of March aid and public safety and public safety
for years. So there'll be only this to finances as well. So they will fill in so
I think I sent you all everybody's by except me. You're cheering us to say something. We're working on enhancing our sit down list this person's very possible and get real depth with Adrian Kohler was sent out down and think
What are probably
need to be sent when you send out the slips.
I did not send it out if if it was sent out. I don't have a record of sending that out. Yes, I don't think so.
It was she's she sent it over. After you know, she got up to the mic and said that she had not heard anything and I told her that I sent over a request for 200 The Center for bio and contact tried to call her and I always call her better more house number and so they don't have all the competition but she did sit down No. Would you say no.
I did not send it out if it was sent out. Because I don't have a copy of it. I tried to pull all the ones that that I had a copy of receive a copy of
I'm interested in Florida for the last four American that was leaving.
I sent out very Russell's bio last month. And I'll look back and see if I have
when she was at the
presentation, she did say from six to she did after she indicated that she had not heard anything, she did go back and sit. So we do have that available should print it out for Saturday, but my question is, since we have all these slots, and you know, that takes up a lot and you want to just kill with a CRB for November and do everything else in December. Hey, thank you. Okay.
Somebody, anybody? Yeah, prayerfully ecrb is missing whiskey for five months. So acrp had the pretense greater priority because it will have to be born at a certain level.
But that process takes so long so in order for them to be ready to be seen in in GA, we definitely have to give them the process in our November meeting. Now. Public Safety Commission, they've had their last meeting for this year. So outcome. Now person, they would not be seated until January. And the workgroups most of those have not really started up. And on the BeltLine, their process is not that long, Sophia. She's been on the board in December. She still could be seen in January for their junior year, even if they have chocolate chip on
suited by our board or counsel. I believe me, I think well, that doesn't work for you at least one
more. Yeah, we got to get through what we what we have to get through things because it is a career now you have to go to January. So back to the question, do we think we can do all these and don't have any major departments where you think you got that look on your face?
Think as long as the information can read maybe in the email that goes out, like please review these things. We don't want people to have to answer a ton of questions or we want intelligent questions based on people are imbued and whether or not they want to vote for somebody versus this isn't getting to know you session where I haven't bothered to read what you've submitted. And I think that you need to give away the oral bio. And I need to ask questions, because I haven't just read
it. So I'm guaranteed that when we send this stuff, they don't read it on the send it out to me, and you know, listen up our stuff. So
I'm familiar. But I think as you mentioned, if the Public Safety Commission is not meeting until January, then there's an opportunity maybe not to prioritize that. Plus, I think there have been concerns about the shifting nature of who's there and whatever else. I think that makes sense.
Meaning they're not currently as proposed. None of them are contentious, right? There's just one person. So it's the decision right now. It's where whether or not someone would say, do we want to fill that seat with someone or we were other ways to get more applications? I think that's a basis for the question. If I were looking at it, I think I would be more inclined to say as long as I could have had a chance to read it. Am I just basically comfortable this person versus I need to try to wait the merits of two different people make a decision between them. So if we if we need to go fairly quickly. I think Jim's Recommendation one. The current agenda is is not saying when we would be voting on these people. So I think if we can get clear on the agenda,
you know, I don't find a lot of that until now.
So what I'm just saying though, is that we could present it in such a way that we're going You do these officers elections, and then you're gonna have these subsequent a while we're counting, we can rather than rather than have to spend any time just waiting for something to happen, we can proactively work through these other appointments. While we're waiting on the tabulation of the election if there's tabulation?
I'm not sure if this is where the effort to I think your question is, what can be eliminated abbreviated or put off to December with maybe a January seeding of these appointments? Is that the question?
The question is, our process is that all applicants are vetted by the HR. So for whatever reason, it seems to take a little bit longer, we'll be doing it in person. But nonetheless, for the acrp, the ACR B's vetting process takes a little longer than the rest of the steps. Okay. So in order for these two people in we approve them to be seated at the first January meeting of the ACR, we would need to have voted on them at our November meeting. So that could go out. And then a CRP would have to be assembled,
first of January,
to do what they need to do. While the others, they came, you know, their corn, but most of all of these other boards have completed their meetings for this year. So we have, what time we got on there in December and get back home, and they'll be ready for the first meeting is
since this Public Safety Commission overall has not been fully functional. I have presented the working groups feed intuited not
not only that, it's a question of quorum, you've only got three that are submitted, there's a total of 15. So you need to have a quorum. So I think that group can be eliminated as well.
Well, that's only if everyone else has already made their appointments, because eighth house appointments aren't the only ones to the subgroups. If there's a possibility,
I got to the 15th. And I think this working group is specific.
We have, we have three for each of the working groups and working groups, we have the team, but then there are other agencies that are all seeing admins
and the working groups. Yeah, there are other sentences feeding in okay.
So I strongly suspect that those are appointed either that way. And because they have not been commissioned to report to, then I think it sort of falls underneath the politic commission. But if we're interested in waiting on that, I think we can wait on the rest of it as well.
Yes. So
Calvin, and Gabriel,
we're on now, the deadline, where I put up 70 Is that they have I haven't checked to see if they actually are going to have a future meeting in November. But so if we want to focus on those three, then go ahead and do those. Do every single
person in the room?
This is everybody in agreement with that? I think so.
Basically, the lower part of this list is excluded from business on the agenda. And priorities being given based on the reasons outlined, I think prior and especially today, CRP, this data and you're they're not meeting anyway, but they can't make you know,
they haven't secretions. And like I said, we have six basic vacancies for take that. Personally, if we had you say you have some people from Ron that
last was the executive being heartbroken about their communities and those words,
I will cheer to send me that because it's sending at least half of our vacancies. What happens to December?
Well, most importantly, their attendance. So if we send in the names of people who don't show up, we're actually doing them a great disservice because we make it hard for them to make more
precedence. people show up and find it to be useless whatever they're doing and don't come back to people from what happened in the last year at least one change, reliable portrait type. We found it to be So listen to us in six months as recently
entered us into a pap, a good point people will not be showing up because then that just, you know, another black mark on our reputation. I would rather much rather us wait until we get
people who are truly interested. And not just their own personal agenda when it comes to schoolwork I really don't want to do with work. Because there seems to be what we have what's been happening a lot. Pretty much. Here's 10 things about
James, give us a report. At this point, maybe one was an issue, and then the people there didn't seem to know or understand or really liked what was going on. So those were both governments, that others didn't, that people were saying things that he knew were not consistent with what he was reading. And then secondly, they were not able to make for 76 months.
So maybe I can share
some of those some of those challenge for the other day, who was a commissioner that exists just for that purpose. They are turned by motion collectors. I think that's why most of them exist.
CRP sets work. So
per the resolution, which created the Public Safety Commission, and each of these working groups, the working groups were only to be appointed for 180 days in the first place.
And the days has already expired. Okay.
So I think it's worth giving us Public Safety Commission functioning. And then once they're functioning, figure out what sort of leads to flow and out of it, versus we need to beat ourselves over, whatever, like we can't get people busy, and we appointed people. And the person's like, when are they meeting or not meeting? Because nobody else has made an appointment. So
So what's the update on the Public Safety Commissioner? Does that work?
Well, I think I told you all that there had to be an issue with the court. And as a result, the Council issued legislation to reduce the number of members so that they could do stuff
and be able to go meet because there are five jobs
where you have to check with them to see. So ultimately, they had they had their last meeting or for last or something like that for this year for public safety commission.
That particular commission. So for the actual commission, how many seats do we have?
We now have
and so we've appointed by the
board, we have for 2.4 people that we appointed, and they issued the first one say we did. So that's
their tumor. Nice Paris.
The environment. What's his name? Terry Anderson, it was in a dark day during the Bush years. She's on a CRP. And what about
criticism, some separate Fallout is public safety, cheering PQ, not necessarily as a PAP appointment. That's awareness and when they redid
this ordinance, the last one they're setting you're on the last minute I am under the listing of people and the agencies that are appointed. They have the AIPAC public safety chair as a separate line item. So we have still have that they gave us
another slot. So we have six so we
have five and then that was
so it took the added it, it was there they took it away down and put it back.
Well see when originally it was The APM APM. President or designee, Debbie made the decision that she did not want to sit on the board. So she says we have saved the chairperson. Our point, Chris to this one. So then when they went back and redid the legislation in February last year, they removed that slot. All right. And so now, we have a PAP actually has five slots. Right. And they listed the last time on General Motors is the APEC public safety chair. Okay, that's a separate
lock. So So So the bottom line is early on that designee was the chair, because she made it our decision to appoint Chris, it wasn't a removal of Chris, it was really a removal. And
so that's one thing is seven of us. So that should be enough work for
you. 12 of us, so seven would be. 624676. No one asked me, Why do you want to just? Okay. No corporate decision. Yeah, but decision making?
Well, we don't make any decisions anyway. And as
I was just wondering, I just want a decision as to whose names to put on the agenda for two other things to positions for on Saturday. And so we pretty much are I think we're in agreement that we're going to put the two acrp applicants on the agenda. And we're going to go ahead with the One Belt, Montana.
Yeah, I thought that was already discussed at the last night, you know, some of this, Gabrielle Dudley,
and we talked about everything I'm talking about. So we can't vote on all of these at the November election because we're having elections as long as possible. So I'm trying to divide these up. So important, now will be on November, and then the others will have a December. And since we're saying the Public Safety Commission is no longer meeting for this year. The public safety work groups then can be held
for long. Yeah, that's cool. Also, Gabrielle who as we discussed her the last
semester. All I'm saying is, are we gonna do three applicants next Saturday's meeting for summer next year.
So okay, so are we going with these three here? The top three, okay.
Okay. But I think further comment was the focus not requirements or general policies the ratify these folks before putting them in front of the body as for what vote is not so that there was not a vote required to for these individuals from this committee? That's what you were asking. No.
So for the agenda for Saturday, we are going to put the screen on the phone and the rest will be notified
as these will be
similar. So tomorrow, all three of those people will be notified that they will need to attend a meeting on Saturday and we send out their resumes and we'll send a letter to them notifying them okay.
And just to be clear, you have copies of the of these three currently their resumes okay. I do not say I have Kelvin I do not have Adrian's and I am not sure that I have Gabriel's Gabrielle's.
Yeah, Adrian's and glory it's for the only two buyers that I did not have yours
to so before I have an updated like, show what was it been over
for that application? his email was sent out after mine.
The application for the
working groups for yes, the work groups. That was why yours wasn't included in the APAC executive committee agenda that I sent out. at it. I just didn't have
that this workgroup only came up. I think it only came up last week, because we met my Executive Committee met on Wednesday evening. And that's when I, I think it was formalized within my executive committee allowed to be appointed. So the term didn't come out since Wednesday, addressing this,
this agenda with the applicants bias and resume.
Oh, my father was already available and can be updated. I think it's for the election. So we do have that as a candidate.
Yes, I do. Now, when this was sent out, I didn't have it. Does that. Does that make sense?
Oh, okay. Okay. But I guess I saw something from Tim saying that the BOC everybody, all vials were there. And I thought
I should have something for a pep officer elections, say, Here's your bio from last year. If you want to update it, send me an update. And then for those who never sent me a bio last year, could you send your bio, but
more often than
ever before as well? No, I
mean, I hate the word that she sent me a bio. Because she's candidate.
No, no worries. No worries cosmic.
Lee needs something from your chair, saying that you're interested in that squat has to come from your chair, and your buyer needs to pay attention to
this advisor. But this has been delayed anyway.
Yeah, but I'm saying you still need to tell Troy just send me an email
just occurred. I was in development. I was the pilot. It was going to be because she was talking to
you assume that she was just grabbed it from the election. And and I came out after all this was talked about. So she's saying she will do that. But initially, no, it wasn't said to us that I
forgot there's a second something going on. They're required to
proceed the October of this year from just basis again. Central yet the September minutes are attached to your packages page. Please take a look at those corrections that need to be made. We have no presentation scheduled for the election. And on the resolution. Tn The time is now? Yes.
The draft agenda. You have not included the march 1.
I have put this out. We're waiting to see exactly what was actually going to be on the agenda. Oh, I brought the car seat concert privacy. But when make sure is now.
Yes, you've watched last month as well. Because just last month, we had that confusion with two different versions being distributed. We decided to defer this one severe times. We have nowhere to go
those are two plus complex. These two resolutions are two of the last or the last. Yeah,
the last weekend we had MRC, concurrent she was beside them but we deferred it because of the conflicting versions. And then our primary was we also had conflicting versions of it probably. And we didn't have a fact sheet for NRC concurrency. So maybe you should look at too funny.
Your glasses Did you see the sanction? No, but this is the best
defense she has more stuff in it.
But this is where the rest of us understand.
So come November 21. Two on for your meeting. Did you find the low power on bootcamp was going to district
I will try to confirm with the other members regarding the location before the 21st
and some I went into that meeting.
So then we got cdhs Somebody
Yeah, now I'd sit in the committee report that the meeting date was TBD. If you listed it as
automatically use your
time, I'm gonna be out of town. So you would like to be the host of that meeting in my absence, then we could have it down to regular time and day. Or we could reschedule it for after I return. Either way, but, but I will be a way I could certainly do it as I was gonna
ask, Are you available? Just a way?
Yeah, I shouldn't be it's in the evening. So I don't think in terms of other things going on, so I couldn't concept zoom into it. Okay. Would anybody be in person? Or would everybody be zoom?
Well, you need to have two people in order to have quorum. Right?
Right. That would be a problem, then unless you had somebody else physically showed up, because you have been the second person physically present past.
So yes, I would have to have a conversation with Gloria or Terry or someone else who has been attending and saying where because it wouldn't make sense for us to drive to Tuesday. If nobody else lives up to
the venue could change the time could change. Or we could just push it back a week.
I've been telling the pilots that 75
software
bugs are right there on lightstream.
layaway, Terry will probably be favorable for laneway to
she's called white students. Previously,
probably in Wait, it's on Wait.
Can we achieve our TV I'm
hitting the table to the sleeve. It's been negotiated between these two. I will that will
actually set boxcar. That's probably the most. Well, you've got you can go through your phone as a hotspot. Right. Yeah.
I believe the Monday night also has. So if you don't care
finalisation there?
Do you want to have that be the official meeting
members? I can't do the 12. So if we're gonna keep it on the same day, then yeah, I'm happy to lead it. He was saying that he can't meet on the fifth. He could be on the 12. I can't
be able to twice. I can't be physically on the fifth. So I'll be in national.
So I said we keep it on the fifth. We will confirm a new location at least tentatively, it's somewhere at the lead white complex. And we'll get that squared away in the venue. Yes.
Okay. So I just need to take Tusa off and just GBA
we'd still use your zoom link. That way there's no issue.
I don't see that as a problem. I can either send you the login information or I can be a virtual host and you can be a virtual guest. Physically the chair either way and hoped that the jury would be here cannot come out he said on this for his record you over there okay.
The October October report. There has not been a November transportation.
GDP in October. This is
in October. Yes. This is the October report and he met in October it was also sent out in the last executive committee meeting I think
physically present tonight. Everybody else was virtually universe switching.
Yeah, it was pretty interesting.
So did you all be
here? No.
Okay, we're gonna use our standard form because he has no date on here as to when you're off. He says October but he didn't give her date or location. So you could pass those down sent to Trent transportation. He's got to set the meeting though. Thank you. Is it frustrating when you're just in case I don't get a chance to make sure he understands he needs to use our computer report definitely needs to show the date. Put the names of people use, but it doesn't show the date since October. And it doesn't show the location is on the last on the last page December 11. They have a second community reception center was observed December 17. is a regular APEC meeting.
According to Korea's but according to our records, the education committees on the 26th says there's meeting so make sure that you're getting almost perfect safety committee has anybody spoken to Chris, as I've talked to each of the Ehab Public Safety Committee meeting is central over a cleanup flyer for some organization, but he did not send over anything regarding his committee. So if any of any of you attended.
Did everybody see?
Yeah, I got a copy of the fire.
All right. Jim, was there anything regarding your report? Your committee report? Is there anything on your resolutions that you should address today?
I think they're self explanatory. And certainly there's additional explanation for the concurrency one in the fact sheet. So as long as we get current versions after five years, we shouldn't have.
Have you shared that fact sheet further than the printout that's here?
Yeah, I can.
I can send it to all of AIPAC or I can send it to just be here today. Or I can just actually send it to Laura for
defense. She was attached to the notices that went out for this meeting. Yeah, it's a resolution. And as you put the fact sheet right beside it, this was awesome. So the entire body will get the fact sheet.
And like I said, I did correct a couple of typos after I since it's so recent. And so will we send the type of broken version. You
know, I mentioned this resolution to my folks that exhibit in my furniture I was asking about Paul, he really wants to be a part of the conversation and just get part of the story always. So yeah, I think very appropriate microphone. Yeah. He I think he'll be a welcome addition is just as many maintenance site.
He was interested in the date. Yeah. Which which the the other resolution that we have the committee addresses?
Yeah, it was. It was title of the draft was resolution calling on the Atlanta Department of City Planning to adopt a reasonable approach to densification of the city is undertakes the process.
We had it at our last meeting, but we never got around to discussing it. Because we will run out of time we've got to get on the agenda. So we're going to be discussing in our next meeting and it's still
okay, as far as the delegates and alternates are concerned. One change in the staff now is replacing Dr. Cooley as an alternative MTU this last roster or anything else. I look at the website. I think we're doing this together, getting the agenda is posted in time, and the changes and resolutions and traps of resolutions that they can do those three things. everybody had a chance to take a look at the website unaware that we have ready to go, yeah, it looks good. And so once they do just a few weeks, maybe two or three links, the links to the agendas are to any drafts of resolutions, or any any letters or papers or white papers or anything like that, that we submit to the house? Those should be locked up. Yeah. How do you have enough chances to talk to people, then then, what was the final result was 1425.
So I spoke to Terry earlier today, he's, since he wasn't gonna be here, we're gonna try to touch base with them this week in advance of the committee meeting coming up on Saturday. But as we discussed in the last meeting, the plan was to have a generic email account, similar to the Gmail exit address that exist. And then since jurien, already has an email account, keeping it intact. Otherwise, everything would be created as people requested it versus we're creating stuff and saying every chair needs to adopt whatever sort of policy but instead, we use that catch all account as we do with the current gmail account to pull information together,
is it possible for you know, just not people want the name of the committee, and all the emails go directly to the senior transportation committee. You know, I prefer things by the committee's, and that's because, you know, receptive to change. And we don't want to
personalize,
we do want them to be generic by the committee. Before we discuss anything, rejection,
we did discuss creating some filters. So if an email was sent to bylaws, committee, x a pad atlanta.org, whatever, if it goes to the committee members, it could go go to the chair, a copy can be archived, whatever that happens to do you need that is possible. And we can do
okay, that's fine. All right. So that brings me to this. Most of the campaign you have very much in October. We don't get the names of the new delegates and alternates and or chairs a lot of time in Georgia. It takes them December and then January, as January sits out for us in December. So please get many of the some of the simpler and a lot of changes as of January. So we still have to come up with a resolution regarding our membership status. We talked about it early on in here. And we concluded that we were in compliance with the ordinance because we actually only have 25 voting members. But we have been out of compliance. And that attorney just like cryptography when she was talking to me about she said, Well, you're supposed to send us a list of your your voting members and you're supposed to send us any changes you make in your bylaws you spoke and she went on and on problem states that I didn't even know that essentially, we each have the NP use is supposed to designate one person to be the voting member. That keeps us total for that year, that person is the voting no less something happens in the US to replace enforce the NPU to designate their voting member, they can delegate alternate chair whatever that they went that one voting member this vote we can keep the rest of the rest of the 75 because we don't want them to become disenfranchised. But we do want to make sure we have the people to put around these boards and stuff. And that we had talked about referring to them as non voting representatives. We need to get this to signed on and cleared up so you know, 21st and get back into the bowels.
So this thority addressed in our bylaws. We discussed adding some language just to know to clear it up even though you don't see that as that was when he says in the bylaws, there are 25 minority members, that sort of stuff.
What I'm here because number one are about laws, let me read to you what it says about law so we can be clear. The Board shall be composed of up to 75 members, 25 NPU chairs, 25 delegates and 25 alternate doubles, the MVP, you chairperson, the official board member shall have the right to serve on the board, or appoint a delegate, or the ultimate. Each neighbourhood Planning Unit shall have one vote each year by December 31 NPU, Chairperson shall submit to the President and recording secretary of AIPAC and the NPU coordinator, that name address phone and cell phone numbers of both delegate and alternate delegate for the ensuing year. And then it goes into failure to champion provide this information. This does not state what the ordinance states. Tell us how it used to say my copy does not say hold on Guardian bleeds. It does not state what the ordinance states. So we need to stay in here. What the ordinance states. Now. We don't want to say we got 75 members because we don't have 75. It needs to read first, whatever the ordinance states and I've got a different point of view about it. That's fine. We'll talk about we need to state what the ordinance states and then indicate that those 25 voting members are going to be identified. And here's the thing, December 31. We always thought we could say December 31. And we wouldn't by the end of 31st. We have any information that is so case we
move on to that and all it says and I'm reading from exactly section 64001. We're gonna go right to sub bullet point A, there is hereby created a Planning Advisory Board, which shall be composed of 25 voting
members, you know, and I'm saying it needs to be stated in here. This is not stated in what viaggiare just
read that each of you will have one body members.
Okay. Sample rushing in these two, what you just read, in addition
to that, it also says on here that we can prepare our own bylaws, as long as we're consistent with the state whenever so we can have members that are not voting members. Exactly.
That's what I say. I didn't say we
didn't start like, Okay, I said,
I want to disenfranchise the other 50. Member Are you want to be able to allow them to be 10. So we talked about it, perhaps referring to them as non voting members or not voting representatives of NPP. So that wasn't the issue. The issue is when we work on the bylaws, we need to rephrase
this.
So I don't think that we need to be done now because it's not required. And since I've been a part of this body and y'all most of y'all have been members longer than me. We've always had a chair or delegate or at least We've always had a delegate and optional, and we never identify and say, Oh, you are the only member up here. So that person is not there. We've always let the other person vote. If we do it your way, if the person is not there, then the MP you will not get a vote yes. I'm telling you, what I'm saying is you're what you're what you're saying is,
we're supposed to be submitting to
them. So when it comes time to swear in officers, she's swearing the officer, and any new voting members that have not been sworn in previous
total 25. And so is going
to be 25. And it will be any of the could be a recurring member, there's no need for them to be swept up. You're the voting member, if you are the officers, she said they have to swear, if you are the new designated voting member of your MP you and you've not this morning, prior to that happened this
morning, early morning she was sworn in. She said we're not because it says the body changes every single time. That's like saying, oh, Representative Lee and Jeremy elected we are going to swim in the next Congress, she informed and again, even though she did she got reelected, as someone who's really appointed to the AIPAC for 2022 2023. They need to be sworn in. Like that's, that's I mean, we have to take the new ethics fouling unit, it's a different body. If one person changes on the 25 voting member, that is totally different model. Everyone is this morning.
This is a matter of before the Bylaws Committee, is it not? And this is a matter before the bylaws, committees and not. So then why are we doing the bylaws committee work?
We're not I was just basically letting you all know, we have I have to get with the corporate to set up the date for the swearing in January, has become a problem for doing that, because we still don't have everybody in place in January. So it's been said pretty much all February. Before that, we have to submit, the President has to submit to a list. The voting members might tell her listen, the officers listed those the voting members and any of those voting members that have not explained before, we'll have a moment. If we want to ask her just wearing the whole 25 I don't think she'll have that she just is about waiting to the last. Just send her the facts and the data that she needs.
My understanding of your question, the purpose of Office is there will be 25 voting members give me their names, to check in to the sides not to who your designee is. So they're gonna put that person's name instead. And
that's the problem. So the chair is the appointee, not the chairs, designee. It's the MP use. That's the other portion that if you read the ordinance, right,
that's not the position at
all. Absolutely. That's no, that's not how
the ordinance is not what you're saying. Of course, the position is that there is one vote per NPU. And it's fine. Let me finish please. One voting member and to your earlier point, if that member is not present that NPM does not have a vote. That is the city of Atlantis position. Not an alternate person voting in the absence numbers in the members have Zags over delegate voting members absence. I'm not I'm not here to debate, your position and my position. I'm telling you what the city of Atlanta position is on this topic. So the reason that's position is that there there are 25 voting members and if a voting member is not present, that NPU does not have a vote in that matter.
And that's another layer into that layer. I understand how she does the chairs are those five voting members shares are they in advance if they realize they're not going to make the meetings and they're not going to vote? They then say put Sandra Bullock in that spot because I'm the chair and she will be now to authorize
the chair or the chairs, designee one of the two
that is not what the what the
what the ordinance so
unless you present that to me in writing from the person giving that official day
says the city of Atlanta says that what I am saying is indeed what the code says. You are saying that what you are saying is what the code says the city of Atlanta is the authority unless the city of Atlanta tells me so for example,
let's let's start with the real short thing. The chair of each new planning committee, or the designee of the planning committee shall have one vote. How do you interpret that as being loaned to the chair?
If you want me to help you with that, I would say they're saying that they're saying, Okay, this new list we have, these are going to be the 20. Right people
on the list I'm talking about in terms of okay,
let me pull them up. Let me say this that may comport with your mission, this new list of your 25 voting members should be the chairs power, the option the ordinance gives is that chair feels pretty much they're not going to be the voting member, I'm not going to give my slot to Susan Bullock. So at the time that this this new, this this register has now formed, it has now the chair or the the chair says we will be voting members. Office now at City Hall, so that now the Sandra Bullock doesn't show up, even though she's instead of the chair yet NTU does not get a vote.
So the work done since then the chair new planning committee, or the designee of the liberal Planning Committee, Chair is not in there on a Singapore when he looked after the board chair is not present. It says the name of the Planning Committee, which we learned from historical knowledge, that committee is alliances with planning unit. And so what I'm saying to you is that the designation of who gets to vote does not belong to the chair, if he or she is not present, it belongs to me with the planning, you know, it will love that again.
That's right, or the chair, or
somebody else has to say, we don't want to get into discussions, I just want to make sure that everybody is on the same page with what is the current agenda that's in December. And I don't know how we're gonna work this because most of them in the US are doing their voting now, some don't vote for whatever reason, until December, we don't get their information sometimes until middle of January history their 40s are. And so we've had to shift when we had our swearing in to February because of that. One of the questions that I got this week was maybe you all need to change your elections. So that when you leave your country is everything to continue to woo, and you don't have to wait on anything. That's something that you all need to charge discuss. So ultimately, we have to submit
we talked about if we don't receive a change for, you know, a b, d, then we roll with who was last year that's in on my last slide. So again, the idea that we need to push out a syllable that was there before even I became a member that was already in there and says that, if you don't know by us by December 31, then it was assumed that the previous delegate ultimate are the same until you notify us and DCP there has been a change where they
we have our swearing in ceremony in January. That means person swearing in these people and they intend to wear it chairs may have made a change. Okay, so all I'm saying is these are things that we need to discuss. But understand that the president of APEC has just submit to the cop's office in December certain documents and that's our reality. Yes.
This December deadline. What is this December?
December 31. December?
Well, you mentioned the December 31. deadline is December
31. Deadline is what we have here in this thing under members that were to be notified by December 1.
We always ignored them because we never get them
so are we are we not wanting to ignore it again this year? Well if
I think you do, yes.
So what do you do when something in your bylaws don't work for you? Will you historically nori? Well, the bylaws
agreed but that's business for the Bylaws Committee fully agree and I
think that we also are going to move for how many changes do we actually have turnover? That is after that was after election happens for now. And there's a change that we don't get notified of They're like, there really isn't. I can't think of one person that actually fought for us. No. Do
you mean how many people you're notified on in February that you weren't notified on before that customer off is that happened to my son, I would say, less than five, somewhere around five who does have more
is it doesn't have to be an elusive gift, because by December 31, all elections in EU level have to take place. So by December 31, there is a there's a face there speaks appointments, or fixed assignments in those roles. What you're saying now is that we just kind of visited and whenever we are sworn in, and a bit changes subsequent to that, then we change it, making it less elusive is by changing our dates, so that in fact, we know by December 31, who knows who those individuals are, let's fix by ordinance, they have to have it done by December. So
can we change it to December, January, February, they still will be changes throughout the year of people being swept up and down.
And that's what this is
concerned about. The officers have to be sworn in by the clerk's office. She's got to be one swearing in of officers, any
real your officers by December 31. So then what are we talking about?
ceremony and any AIPAC voting members that have not been sworn in, in the past have to be sworn in by shooting? So that happens when the she swears in the officers?
Okay, ask a question. Yes, go ahead. Well, I'm just curious, we sat through the sort of ceremonial swearing in that was really long. Is there a reason why we cannot go to at our own convenience during whatever, you know, a set time period, presumably,
let me just let me just, I'm living and she is not swearing in 75 people
ever again, that's not my questions change
in our bylaws by mistake. Okay. And so what I call her to figure out find out what all we needed to submit you as October that we had seven sheets, how many people bring in Joker? 75? She said, that's 75. I said we amended our bylaws to include 25 to 25. That was what about all that she sent me an email back saying please send me those vows. She got the bylaws, then she sent me an email back saying, Can you please send me a copy of the ordinance that changed your voting requirements? And I'm like, I don't have that. And that's when she I think she didn't she didn't come back to me, she was ready to play. Because she said you can't change your voting members without a change to your order.
And I'm not asking Okay, I'm not asking you about voting members. I'm not I don't have any question I am asking about the aspect of swearing in is would it be a possibility within a time period identified that would be amenable for the municipal clerk's office for us to stop by and be sworn in, at her convenience, whatever or honestly, his convenience, whatever would be a means by which of doing that rather than taking away our time from the conducting of business? That is my question.
You know, the officers are always going anywhere.
Well, soon for the SDR.
But when you were sworn in for the str, which all of those people on the STR commission, remember, we were all appointed by different and we all were appointed at different times. So there was I was I was sworn in on Zoom. Yeah, but I'm saying that there's no way she could afford she wouldn't you know
what I mean? Just pointing out that it's perfectly possible to swear so when he knows
it, I'm sure it's it's possible to swear them in via zoom. I would assume that it is also possible for me to like just go by the office and be sworn in and unless there is some need for some ceremonial aspect of it, which I don't personally need. I feel like we could make this amenable and that has nothing to do with the voting members, the voting number or anything like that. I'm just talking about not to taking time away from the actual meeting. reserved for
the actual swearing in. And according to our bylaws. That first meeting really is supposed to be for to install the officers established committee and committees for chairpersons. as set forth goals and objectives for the year, that is supposed to be our January.
But I would respectfully say that
to do that we can't even install offices in January, based upon
their lots of bylaws that we don't necessarily adhere to by by the letter of, of what is written in our bylaws. So if it serves the municipal clerk's office better, that we be helpful in the sense of respecting their time, and we respect the body's time, if we just go by and get sworn in. I don't mind doing that. Like, that's not a that's not an inconvenient thing. There's only four of us officers, if we even tour in the whole thing. I mean, let people go have their own accord to get that done. They have to they have to file an ethics report of their own accord as well. I just don't see why we have to take that time away why it has to be ceremonial. I mean, unless we really feel like that's important. I feel like we could actually get get work done and actually get the the goals discussed and things like that in January, rather than the ceremonial aspects
into the visual added to state repeat after,
I think it was a mess.
Everybody raised their hand. So it's just momentarily was unlike anything we saw the last time either way. They make exceptions for folks who, you know, who don't want, they may make exceptions. But was there a moment to
be said that is a no to my, to my question. Okay. That is so it has to be this way it cannot be.
Okay, as you may have envisioned and nothing like last year, it was all in 10 minutes. Everybody raises their hands, and it's done. What else?
Yeah, what else do we have to what else do we have to cover in this agenda?
For sending you an email with your, your oath and that ethics thing, you will sign your oath and ethics things right after she has completed the swearing in August, and she will take those with her. Okay. So
I'm amenable? And I think Lawrence brings up a point. Can we at our convenience, go ahead and be smart? And why not? Why not just put that out there.
I don't mature as fast to be able to start to use Well, the middle of mountains awards? What what are we doing with that?
If you notice that down here that we're planning it for February, March, because we really don't have time now to pull all that together unless we get some whole handful of volunteers that really want to work on thinking that perhaps for the month of February, that's going to be cold, February or March. So that's up to you all, I just plan for February, March as
so we're putting on the next administration next
year, our guests because unless unless some of you want to try to plan it between now and have it before December 31.
It ended last time and I worked with the newest of incredible work vendors qualifying them, paying them looking at what they are going to provide. It was still the top down sells incredibly
close to them. That was $45 of whatever, that we've been asked to speak before December 31. But now with the awards.
We put we're spending How much is it? Because our I was in a prison. I mean, my discrepancy with how much money isn't there a discrepancy with our accounts or how much money? No, actually,
I thought I had 4800. And then she said with being vaccinated was 48 because they reimbursed daily last year when she paid the Google sting. So it's 746 or something like 46 or something like that. But that was the only thing that we paid last year. So thinking about taking this exactly about four to 600. And now if we ordered even the 25 plants before we've been able to do a pass we get four worth it. And then once the NPU sit over there the names of their people, their company goes to hit grace. We can't do that. We'll go ahead and get those.
Two to two people who are interesting. Okay, I thought it was 50 they got to currently be thinking on one person or one person in a business, maybe?
No, no. Well, we did in the last 2019, we had one person for the NPU. And then we have that category for businesses and nonprofits that have been very inefficient.
And she's really unhappy with it. But this work is since I'm here who really enjoy that action that
people will enjoy your work because you're saying thank you for
but they didn't take it on I thought is I'm just
not familiar with reimbursed by the Trump administration to pay, I know as P R K.
N has the oldest offenders and every citizen.
It's actually not a thought process at all, that don't have the money or spend it, however you see it, we just leave the receipt to them. We don't have anything to do with that.
She's got the template for it. And I'm hoping whatever, in whatever way,
well, no, keep in mind, what happens with this is we have to crane, the printing brochures, the cost of the food, the cost of the plants, that's generally where the money goes, and then maybe a couple $100 to get the ratios or something like that. But that's generally where the money goes.
So I think regardless, it is impossible to pull it off before the end of the year. Because sometimes, if you don't have noticed yet, some have already met November won't meet in December, I think, even if we wanted to make it happen, logistically, it's going to be impossible
is missing. It takes a lot job. And I know I did it last time, it took me working on just
programs. So can we get the money spent for putting the
assessment, I was saying we can order the plants, they are on credit. And we'll go ahead and pay for those. And then we, we get them, he'll bring them to us. And we're still in the leaves office, because we love him, he'll bring them to us. And then when we're ready with the list of names, then we just take back again, the number that we want
to be engraved for
that particular job. But sometimes we order 25 You know, somebody may use me that doesn't need anybody or whatever. So I may not use all 25. But we can we could go ahead and order those. As far as the food is concerned, don't prepay a caterer you know,
when you think planning, so if we Okay, so I don't know if the position where we spend the money, or we don't spend the money. So we don't spend a bunch of connection is normal for you. As long as we talk, so we spend the money amongst all of them, that we get some replacement spent on the wrenches. How's that?
Know if we spend money and provide our report to find out that allows us to opt for 2420 23 We did not apply for grants this year, because we just so caught up to our previous strategies.
But because she's got the template, it's conceivable that we could go back to all of those vendors, the folks who put together the programs, the plush, as well as the food, you know, you could conceivably go back to them, see what that invoice is. And if it Max, we could conceivably contract with them and do it much.
Further, or we can have we did it for January meeting and then you do the swearing in and the actual horse and then just have I guess one day of pomp and circumstance
well in so what you're saying then is, instead of having an official meeting for January, we would actually have an event
and the swearing is officers.
Just kidding, the templates are getting those invoices and getting those met working with all of those different parts of parts and getting making sure that they're still in business. Because the template is this because you don't have to go reinvent all of this. That's the key thing
was why the tool was good. So I mean, you can I
cannot suggest that not being in January, February and the reason I'm saying that is inevitably, our APEC meeting date Joey always falls on him shows well into
the first week of the month. So okay, so let's say if we use most of the money, and we don't have it all spent until February, does that mean that we cannot apply for money from it? I'm gonna have no money next year.
Yeah. Our bad decisions for to handicap the next group have a bad hand automatic process to handle. What was the question? So we spent the bulk of the money, but don't finish cleaning all that money out until the meeting in February, we'll be allowed to apply for money next year. Yeah. So he's the next to have no money hasn't been totally
reconciled.
Whatever that prior Grant was,
it has to be closed out by December 31.
Of this lesson, anyway.
These plans are not from this year, or, or from the year before the 2020
pandemic we were not able to do to do anything.
And I can say honestly, that I've never seen a financial report. I've been here for three years, I never saw
financial secretary.
Never seen a report anything since. But I mean, we should still be getting a report.
Last year, Debbie was going out, it went out. That showed this while we were in our group, but did the financial report. She was sleeping and reconciling. And
I think that it's just I mean, I think that we should do it because I believe in a heart broken heart. But we need to recognize people. You know, now my chair, apparently is talking to others. They all been asking for me what matters award was up top ranking.
Is there something else y'all can do that you could more realistically get done by December
31? Yeah, so to this point, why and so if we don't spend if we do spend the money, when when money be available again, 2023 2023.
I just saw the timeline the other day, I think it's, I think it's April, something, just don't quote me on that.
That's fine. But so if we're looking at doing something spending the money, and we couldn't spend it before the end of the year, then there's a gap before buddy would be available, technically again, too. So if you wanted to do these awards, we can pull them off until March, we could fall into a gap if we try to do something else. So point number two, because of the calendar in January, the AICPA meeting is the Saturday after MLK. So they're not the same weekend, that's not a conflict. this coming January, I was going to recommend along the lines of what I think where we it was headed, is that there might be a way to still have a broader celebration that doesn't involve the logistical process of getting applications or nominees and all this sort of stuff. Instead, there's a broader celebration, still committing all the money, something maybe along those lines, as a way to fulfill this obligation had this sort of kick started the new year, and then find a way to reinstall the awards as an annual thing into next year. Quick
question about the CAG. Grant, the application only became available after or by December 31, or somewhere between November and December. It's December 14, I think this year. So right now, we've not spent that money were eligible for 2023 Verse two, but we just decided that event will not take place between now and the
question. So to close out, you using the receipt, right? going take a contract as partial.
So what do you mean? And not not because it has to be complete. It's not just a receipt, the project has to be complete, we have to have any and all invoices, plus photographic evidence or video evidence or any of that stuff. It's not just knowing that it's going to be spent. That has to be done by December 31, in order to make you eligible to apply and then the application is to, I believe, February 28, if I remember correctly, somewhat going up memory so I have a suggestion. If you're interested in it for your December meeting. You'll be there December Yeah, for your December meeting, you have a quasi awards ceremony situation with the reception that serves food or whatever, to acknowledge the people. And the heavy lift, I think it's more so getting the word to the MP use to nominate their people. That's the part that's going to take the time. But the only real work that you need to do in December is getting and getting the awards. So you could do that by December,
I think that would I think that will be challenging once again, given the NPU timeline and schedule and whether or not if you could pull it off or not. And just because if you couldn't hit that much deadline, because that's the sales.
democratic processes, I can tie the person on their own and just sensitive
I am not, but I also don't want to force interviews into that habit, because they don't have the opportunity. Instead, what I'm going to ask is, would it be possible to get the commissioner to the meeting on the 17th of December, and it to be a broader sort of meet and greet reception with her. That even could be open to other like, maybe it happens at noon after the APEC meetings over. And it could be a broader invite for other NPU leaders whatever else to to meet.
So the hosting community?
Yeah, I made the first sketch, I don't have a schedule in front of me. But if I schedule about to
do it, I think that might be in the spirit of what we're still trying to do. And
still, I'm committed to my
spend $5,000 to win that vote. And I'm gonna tell you the truth, I think that will make me a little nervous. That sounds like nothing is
pointless, we're going to be ineligible for the CIT grant.
What if, like, I could literally send an email and call within the next week, every single AP champ and ask them to get us a nomination. So we get the awards.
But that goes back to Kyle's about putting them in a position I wouldn't use the word forcing them because if your standard is above that, they're not going to do it regardless. But
from home meeting, right, where they can figure it out November and December,
so that we don't have a chance.
We scheduled different times for November in December
in December so my big thrusts is, if we don't reconcile all that money, doesn't matter. We're not getting into that. So So while watching
both of these to have the event, but I mean,
let's have a nicer more streamlined when it was great.
Okay, all right.
We could only spend money in a different way. We don't have dedicated support as far as for live streaming our meetings, we could always hire somebody to do that. I don't know if they would do it for $4,500 this
machine and said many times that I agree it's a really feel good event. That's that's been the money on this really feel good event Commissioner coming in, but it does take some planning I'll take that as a no Gloria. I just don't see that. I was very much a part of this important team and I love the way it
is and at this point in time we have money to spend so when I do that, why not use it for something that is
short term mission has asked that he come up with some way by which we can include on our agendas or notifications or link or ask believe it can't just be printed information about the short term problems. Basically, I guess the basic policies and procedures so ultimately, because there's a lot in that you simply have to be upgraded couldn't have guessed it, we printed it on our regular agenda.
They don't have a one pager don't have a one one pager.
Gen. one pager is this In other words, the purpose of the short term room mission is to develop, come up with ways to make the public aware short term rental regulations to go. And one of the suggestions that was made in the meeting was that a path that's one of the agencies would put a link or some information regarding STRS on their agendas
later on when a donation Kamala donation
you should write as the chairperson. But anyway, it my, my short term rental chair told me to make sure that I brought this up to date. But nonetheless,
so I that that, or that we could do that. But the easiest way to do it would have to be a link, a QR code, and or a one page that we can put into our agenda.
I would think that the best way to do need to put a link on anything that we send out, and the reason I say that is, is a lot.
Yeah, I read that. But to get, I think, to get people that I will click on a link. But I think about the senior citizens in my opinion, when we pass this around, they're not going to be pressed to get on the internet, type them again. But if you did a QR code, and a one pager, they will definitely read that one pager, feeling that you're not to get everything when I'm on page, which doesn't love to do things and get them you know, interested? Right? And then this will go find more information
will be attached the one pager
that matters, I think things can you get a one pager
done, it shouldn't shouldn't a condition come up with what their content is, and then ask us to share my notes. Mr. Chair of the short term rental commission. You have a question.
Yeah, one might think the short term rental Commission has great impediment to getting anything done, which is that it is met for a total of three hours on three separate occasions in its entire lifespan. And I spent most of that time debating whether or not time is being wasted, I would argue was pretty good waste of time, in and of itself. So has generated essentially no documentation whatsoever. I believe the essential facts that the staff would like us to communicate to is that the short term rental ordinance will begin to be enforced on December 5. And so the one pager couldn't be one sentence or the irony is that they're almost certain to delay that enforcement. So by the time we hit told the world that there will be enforcement on December the
wonderful sports. Right? Like there's I've heard things I don't know, for sure. Anything. I mean, there were three days, the correct optimal day was the factual
Yes. With the definition is that it can be rented for less than 30 days.
I mean, there are things you can put on there to flush it out and
a one page documents certainly could be generated. But the question was, has it been generated? The answer is no.
Absolutely more.
So what I guess my question is, what are we being asked to link to?
There is a portal on the city's website with all of the application information for getting a short term rental license. And that's just what you want link which the city would like you to go to get a shirt for reservations. Not a
viable No. My response to that he'll be happy to do this. The way I sees every city department should have a link on their website for the short term. Short term rental conditions are not efficient, but short term growth. And, for instance, if you for the sake of War Department, there should be something on there that says considering becoming a short term rental owner, click here to see how it impacts your work. Okay, things that people don't think about when they're doing this. So Department of Public Works if there's something that is impacting those rentals and public works. Does this increase your the number of perfect characters you need now? Whenever? And if so how do you pay for those? There are a lot of things that are not in the portal. So I'm thinking that, yeah, major city stations and commissions and whatever, all should have a link to the poor, but make that link applicable to that particular department. So.
So it sounds like given where things sit and what your commission has told, are requested of AIPAC. If it's as simple as a sentence or even just like link to the page. One, all of that has been handled by DCP. And the staff, you're referring to our DCP staff, there's already a planners report, it could easily be included in the planners report, including the link and for any virtual meeting, anybody might have an A sentence can be out of it. None of that stuff would need a PABs blessing or instructing a DCP to do to get that information out, correct?
Yeah, I mean, I had imagined something along the lines of the textbox public notices that we get under you. With notice of textbox. And if you didn't say something like your city has short term rental ordinance enforcement, this ordinance is December the fifth or maintenance website.
That's the initial protocol after that. Listing the department's to put a link on their sites also.
I'm sorry, what do you ask for? questioning what?
Okay, initially, if we say eight that puts on its agenda, a textbox? Will we ask the other departments, city departments?
As yet no, no.
No short term rental business? Like? Yeah, no, but
I'm just saying, you know, when they asked us to come up
with so I was gonna say, Can we send back a note to short term rental, even though yes, we were willing to do this, please provide us with a one pager that we can put in our agenda, we'll be happy to put it in there. You know, how many months they
want? I mean, clearly, we already provide links at the bottom of our email, Jim, if you want to a link, we can do that. But you got to have something to link to. So if you want it to link to a portal, that's fine. If you want it to link to something else, you know, just state whatever that is. Oh, see, this
is the overwhelming need for a good marketing plan to let folks know generally. No, no, I don't want to be it. I'm just saying I think they're using every conduit they can but I'm not even sure we're putting it on our agenda, linking it who's really reading our agenda? where's that going? Maybe to the abuse, simply they need a broader bigger marketing plan to let folks know, this is on what's on is everything you were doing before now it's being regulated. First of all, you got to start with that registration. And then once you do that, there's a bunch of rules that apply there. Much of it is enforcement, there probably be people that will not, I think they may be able to go to certain databases like Airbnb registrations, environmental, but it's really the bad apples that even brought it to the cities attention that you have these kinds of alternate houses otherwise known. So what you will need is a marketing plan. And I think goes beyond these little links here. They there, couple of blasts on media, television, etc, etc, that you now have to register. If you don't register, these are likely the consequences involved in enforcement.
Okay, so what do we go to we go back to them with Does everybody agree with the one pager or the checks box? Just a quick 10 slots explanation?
I am in favor of adding another link. If that is something that you or the rest of the short term commission wants. I'm fine with that. Personally. That's not a difficult thing, just whatever that needs to link to. That needs to be provided to prefer the A PABX general Gmail accounts that can be kept as a record in there. But other than that, I don't really care.
Two things the link and the box like that narrative box that says no, I think no, that
was just a suggestion. The the commission did not say anything other than get something on the agenda. Yeah. So this is something was not fine.
And this is to get on a path agenda not on the NPU agenda as
well, that that was why Regina has reached out to Leah about getting things on the Abuja that she has.
I'm sorry, Regina.
Apologies. No, no, no, no, no. Apologize. So
part of the efficiency of the short term medical condition. People say they do something between meetings and then don't do it, which is from the condition results. My gosh,
that's, that's how the Commission rules. So we all get to sing what we're going to do before
the next commission
was, what was she had said that she had reached out to me, what does she mean
about putting a notice on agendas, all EU agendas about the short term rental?
Apparently, Tina was gonna ask,
What? What really matters for me at this point, because
yeah, my NP meeting will be after it gets into your phone.
Do we know if enforcement's actually going to happen on that
day? Oh, I would. Well, well, the city's official position is yes, it is. But if you would like to win a wager on the city side of that, I will take that when is the
last time you heard that? That was their official day? Thursday?
Who's going to be like, what, kid?
Oh, that's the best one. That's the best part. You may recall that a Pap test passed Resolution a while back pointing out so he has Nozomi that office that fails to do zoning enforcement is going to be in charge my
office has tripled its staffing thanks in part to the conversation that you and I have. Not long ago when we had that conversation they six positions for people on payroll and one person in the table. Okay. Yeah, tripled that. Okay, so
are they are they enforcing or
they're doing better? I don't you know, that's that's my sore spot. So I'm with you on that but it is getting better. I can tell you that. Okay,
well, I mean, it certainly couldn't have worse
codified somewhere on some site. All the way controls
there is a portal with all the SPR information
I don't have a part to play in building an adu we're one of the properties that was set up what's up I did miss here with the afro cups look at this list is gonna have problems like hell are you gonna see me next I'm gonna have a clock for
two months planning
does anybody have any progress so I guess that's it I'm sorry. Oops
my brain bye bye. I didn't need to report that that we there was an email which came from regarding the resolutions and that was regarding the resolution not be on the website. That was they are on the website. They were put on the website that Monday so I think it's this past Monday and planning planning plans to have a response to the first resolution
resolution of this year. Yes. You got it. Just got it. First, I mean, because the resolutions that we sent you back, like several years,
so but we're not getting responses to those that we discussed yet. Okay, because that was like three years worth of lessons. Right. What are we doing with them? Nothing. Okay, yeah, I'm not retro actively starting the process.
I did you Identify. Okay, that's what we're looking at 20 twos?
Yes. So that everybody be on the same page. Your office is actually June 1.
We're rounding them to the clerk, the council, the mayor's office and the Department of Parkview.
Do we have a final version of the posting resolution? Posting resolution can be the last one, we cashed. So it's probably not
091. Yeah, we passed it is she? She has everything through.
I have 1235674.
You have four. It was sent to you on July fifth, I sent it to you. And you said received? Oh,
you got it for you got more for you.
So that's correct. Yeah. So
let's carry that energy. Don't get these other people. Not today, not tomorrow.
Those were the last two. Those nine is one the
MRC concurrent MRCP? Yes.
Yeah, that's right. But as
we said, Actually, it was posted, the puppy has the posting was on the attitudes.
You have the final version of it?
I don't think so. But
cover letter for eight. And I do not have a copy of the final version of
the postings from the posting of the Sony notices. Yes, we did. But what I'm saying is I have my final
four. And I have not written a cover up for it. And so traditionally, the cover letter and the final version are the things that go to the final, if you send me the final copy, I will create a cover letter and then I will send it back to the Atashi mail and then it can go off. Right. So can we go with us for a national?
Is that interview?
I was gonna say that I have. So I do have four. I do not have a we're nice.
Okay, yeah, we owe you a we haven't passed on,
I have one through seven in my possession. Right? All of them except for had been routed already. And all except for are uploaded to our website, we will have a response for sure. To one this Saturday. And it's possible that we'll have a response for one to seven except for the Saturday also, actually, I know that the response has been formulated. But I don't know that it will be written up by that. But number one will definitely be written up and delivered by staff.
When do you think you'll have a response to number four?
I haven't even so much as looked at it. So I have no idea. The standard that we I don't know, I just look to see, if I have four I haven't even
hits the hybrid resolution. It's when we pass back in June, that I'm
even gonna get a response from the opening one. So
that was it was the very first resolution that was sent
this year was the first one you got? Obviously City Council
2010, we have a response coming from us. So I definitely can't speak to when we'll get a response to that. But what I can say is that what we've said in our correspondence, they've all been GCP. All of them except this one, they've all been GCP. So the my influence is a little different there. But what we've said is that we would like to be able to provide a have a response before the next meeting. Please respond back to us by the Friday, whatever that Friday's date is before the executive committee meeting. So it would have been due to me on Friday that just passed so that we can make sure we have the two dogs before them this one out rather Monday and ask them if there's any way possible. We can get a response by Friday, and we'll see because it went to the Verizon. It will go I didn't even realize how bad it was. Yeah, it was separate. And when I saw the other email that had 2356 and seven, I assumed that four was still being circulated with y'all. I didn't even bother to look to see what it was or anything like that.
Even though it was sent back in July. It was sent back in July.
I'm actually sorry, I realized that some So amazing right but I had I am actually human. So yes, even though
the five voting members
virtually run I get like miles a day. So yeah, I missed that one. My apologies.
I don't see is there anything else
we so the five the five voting members
today we are
so we all plan to work on rather than trying to coordinate will record it like we did before. I'll get the agenda how are you? meeting Thursday
