So, since that time, then the DNR has done just that, which is part of why the law never gets updated, right? Because the legislature is like, Yeah, whatever. And so we've shrunk our commercial fishing industry down to 13 people in the meantime, and we've grown the fishery up and managed it for recreational fishing. And to the credit of our recreational fishermen. They invested a huge amount of money in helping to restore the fishery, especially when it comes to walleye, bass and some of those species of fish trout. Interestingly enough, though, was not paid for through those dollars, but paid for with just federal general funds to the tune of about 3 million fish planted a year in Michigan and Huron, Lake Superior trout fishery didn't collapse came close, but didn't collapse and has grown up back on its own. So all that being said, the DNR has managed this now since 1969, through orders under that provision. Now the DNR has decided that was that law is not stable. And so they've retracted all the orders that they've issued, and put the fishery now under statute and old rules. And those old rules, one of them, and statutes say you can't fish in deeper than 80 feet of water. Well, that's really difficult now for our commercial fishermen that remain to survive and fishing and only less than 80 feet of water. And so on top of that, the DNR said that wasn't going to issue the permits, the annual renewal that was supposed to come out didn't happen. So now there's a lawsuit between the commercial fishermen and the department. The department is also up to its neck in the renegotiation with the tribes on the tribal fishing rights, called the consent decree that comes up every 20 years. There was a lot of talk from the recreational and the department in the last several years that they needed to basically punish our own commercial fishing industry, so that we could go to the judge and say, see, we're doing it to our guys, therefore, it be fair to do to the tribes as well. I think that was very poor strategy. And because the judge, why would the tribes agree to that, and basically, they have treaty rights, so they get whatever they want, within some minor limits. So strategically, I don't think it was a wise move. But you do have a very, very powerful and significant lobby that wants to end all commercial fishing in Michigan waters. And their influence is very high in this debate. And so they proposed a law change. Last year that came through my committee that would basically have destroyed commercial fishing. Like I said, I did the workgroup, I proposed amendments, 134 of them. The DNR said no. And that's brings us pretty much up to date, where we're at right now, I believe, strongly. And I know Greg does, too. All the up team does, that there's enough fish and enough space to share the lakes between the recreational and the 13 commercial fishermen that remain in this state. But others disagree very strongly have even threatened me for suggesting such a thing. So it's a really, it's a really tough situation right now. And and you guys are recognizing I'm sure that the white fish industry alone is so culturally significant to our communities up here for me Friday night, fish fries are a staple of up culture and around the state. white fish is the only fish right now the commercial fishermen are allowed to really access and sell. I'm suggesting they be allowed a tiny percentage of the trout that they're already catching but die in their nets that they could keep them sell those,