I agree with what you said. My analysis of academics goes a bit deeper, but links to the answer to your question, and we have to think about it, is this. Standing up for anything helps you stand up for the next thing. And not standing up for one thing reduces your ability to stand up for the next. In other words, I think about this as a death of the soul. With every with every failure or refusal to stand up, a piece of your soul dies, and it keeps going, so that when something happens that requires you to really, really stand up, you can't find the energy to do so. Now, how does that happen? Here's my suspicion, and again, my suspicion, based on a lot of empirical evidence, including personal experience, is that when, because a lot of our careers have been made precarious, and for a lot of us, the what it requires to be successful has been made precarious, such that if there's a brand, if there is an opportunity to do something that requires that we lie, or that requires that we say half truths or untruths, that require that we exaggerate and that require that we use a method that we know is pointless, but we know that the grant committee wants to see and we do it for each and every of those opportunities, a part of our soul dies. So when there's a genocide going on, we can't speak. Because, of course, we've been practical about keeping quiet, about saying other things for many years, and for each of those decisions, we either say to ourselves, is a practical thing to do, I. Can't fault that argument, about saying I'm keeping quiet about genocide, it's a practical thing to do, right? So it's not practical thing to do after another, at some point there's nothing is not practical anymore. Nothing's not practical anymore because everything becomes a chain of practical decisions to make. So there's a loss of courage, often conditioned on the terms of our employment, in terms of our career success. That means that at some point we just don't know whom we are anymore. This world is gone, and I'm always... So I grew up in the church. I keep having to say this, there's a verse in Revelations, the final book in the Bible, that has a list of the people who will go to hell? Right on the list? They are murderers, they are liars, they are corrupt people. But the first, the first category of people on the list, are cowards. As a child, I never understood what that meant. I think I do now. Again, I lost my faith. I'm not speaking as a Christian. I just value, you know, deep wisdom from a long time ago. There is something going on there. So that's, you know, if whoever was writing that part of the Bible, thinks first to mention people who can't, who can stand up, should go to hell alongside, murderers, it says a lot, and I keep it, I can't let that go in my head. It's always there anyway. But universities, and this is how it relates to universities, this academic who might describe their soul going slowly over time, they literally began their career having commitments that were moral and in multiple terms, they felt the need to turn away from them, and they felt they need to justify that turning away, that when a junior academic comes and starts and that junior academic wants to live up to their commitment, the senior person looks at them and two things are going on. It's a reminder of the senior academics of failures, right? So look at the junior person and say, can you stop doing that? It's not practical. It's not good for you. Makes me feel bad. Yeah, it makes me feel bad. So don't do it. Etc. And what that becomes then is that the senior person who then gets to create the rules for how university functions, has been that person. Has been that person, just give an example I chose not to, has been that person who has who knows exactly what is going on, and has made a moral set of decisions, often decisions that help them to become senior and then look at this junior person or this other person who is living up to a moral standard that the senior person also shares or used to share. It's a difficult thing to look at. I can imagine that it's a difficult thing to look at this person and support them. They're also saying, they're also saying, with that support, that you have been a failure. It's a hard thing for human beings to do. So that's how I understand the universities. Now, I mentioned academics and grants earlier. It's a very similar thing, because funders are a reflection of senior academics. We often forget that the funders made us not do something bad. The funder is asking all of this very often. It's senior academic to sit on the boards and the committees and the funding grants who crafted all those things, who have put the expectations into those grants. So often, when people are saying, funder, funder, funder, funder, funder, change. I'm like, Look at the academics who have told the funders what to do. Tell them to tell the funders to do otherwise. Now it won't always work, but I promise you, in more than 50% of cases, there has been a senior academic stand behind the what the funder is asking you to do that. It compels you to do something that really harms your soul.