I think I'm not to complicate things, but I think definition three has some difficulties from an operational perspective. So if for example, if we have a meeting, say, you know, we usually meet here for city council meetings and run a pretty centrally located area. And if we say that something like geographic representation is important, and we find out that the folks in the gallery and the audience are not representing all parts of our town, and we start to recognize, well, there's some differences there. And we say, well, we can take steps to address that. Maybe we need to have some meetings in different parts of town or maybe we need to think about the kinds of transportation that people are taking to get here. Whatever the case may be, if we said, you know if it if it turns out that one part of town is underrepresented, and we said well, we should take some steps and maybe consider having a meeting there. Having that meeting in one area means that other people will be disadvantaged from because they will no longer be as close. So the hard part about saying something like the absence of discrimination is from my perspective, discrimination is kind of more neutral and not necessarily negative because we're actually always doing lots of discrimination but we have to justify it. So in the case of saying let's hold a meeting on the other side of town, or if we want to do specialized outreach, well, that's a kind of discrimination. We're saying that geographic representation is really important. If we want people coming from all different parts of town, then we need to pay attention to where they're coming from and potentially use that as a kind of discrimination to say, here's what we think it's fair. We want people coming from all different parts of town. So I, I think maybe this is an unconventional way of looking at discrimination, but I think this is this is actually probably more in line with the how it would be operationalized. The point is to say, have a conversation about what we think are the relevant barriers, what we think the relevant outcomes are, and then justify them. So you see the word fair in here a lot. But we still have to do the work to come up with why are we talking about in the example I was giving geographic representation, but we could think of other examples too. So I think the absence of discrimination, at least from my perspective, is a challenging one, because I think the assumption here is that we're thinking about discrimination from with with bad intentions to put people down. But discrimination is also things like affirmative action, identifying groups that have been underserved. That's that's just another form of discriminating, but not in the kind of negative way that I think it's the assumption is here, so I think purely from an operational perspective. I liked definition for a lot because I think it captures that.